Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 23 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 24

[edit]

04:42:58, 24 January 2021 review of submission by Kkmal.Hamouda

[edit]

My article was waiting and is expected to be accepted. No contrary to the wikipedia purposes. It does satisfy all 4 purposes and is open for editing by public by using (Edit semi-protected) . Someone tried to hide my article by redirecting, his name #TakuyaMurata and not acceptable not to find it. I request finalizing the acceptance of my article. My article is accepted for waiting of 3+ months. Please for any editing use (Edit semi-protected). This is open to public and all. Thanks Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 04:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 04:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kkmal.Hamouda: You've added duplicate, messy requests here, which have created need for cleanup. See these three edits, which resulted in a blank heading at top, and then, basically, a repeated comment at the bottom of what you were trying to articulate in the middle. Note the FOUR signatures you added? Also, it's unclear to me what exactly you're complaining about. If you're talking about this edit from 12 January 2021, that was reverted, so it's not clear what your problem is. Also, is there a reason why you've used two different user accounts to edit this article? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kkmal.Hamouda: your draft reads like a how-to guide, as if you've tried to draft a page from a high-school calc textbook. Wikipedia is not a how to guide, and that's what makes your draft contrary to Wikipedia's purpose (which is to be an encyclopedia). Since it has been rejected, it is not going to be accepted. You might find such content at WikiHow or even on Wikibooks but obviously both of those projects have their own quality standards that you'd need to adhere to (and obviously wouldn't accept something like a by-line on a Wiki page). --Paul ❬talk❭ 09:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:07:43, 24 January 2021 review of submission by 60.229.148.166

[edit]

Because it is notable enough. Trust me. 60.229.148.166 (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask a question, but we don't rely on editors' assertions. We only care what reliable secondary sources would say. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:55:06, 24 January 2021 review of submission by Aban0001

[edit]

(UTC)

This is my first wikipedia article and I wrote about someone whose writing I have been following for some time. However, it has been declined twice, inspite of providing very credible links etc. The reason ascribed is that it does not meet notability guidelines. However, I see that there are wiki pages for far less notable people ( see Mathures Paul or Tarapada Basu), and I am not really sure of what is needed to meet wiki's notability guidelines - the subject of this article is a published author and a senior journalist. Can you advise how this article can be improved to the same standards as applied for Mathures Paul or Tarapada Basu, please? I am unable to consider further articles until I clearly understand what is needed, so your help will be appreciated.

Aban0001 (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aban0001: Welcome to Wikipedia! The draft you submitted does not show WP:SIGCOV in the references, which is required to meet WP:NBIO. None of the sources linked talk about the subject in depth. The draft also fails WP:MINREF. Looking at other articles as examples of why your article should be included is a bad argument (explained at WP:WAX), but I will do my best to answer. Tarapada Basu has received the Padma Shiri, which is a major accomplishment and therefore meets WP:ANYBIO point 1. While this does not guarantee notability, it provides a strong argument for why the article should exist. In the case of Mathures Paul, the article was started over a decade ago when notability guidelines were not enforced as well as they are today. The article has a banner at the top noting that the subject may not be notable. If you feel the subject is not notable, you could start a deletion discussion at WP:AFD. I also wanted to note and get your response on the fact that other editors have identified you as a possible undisclosed paid editor, which is a conflict of interest. See WP:COI and WP:PAID for more information. Please WP:PING me if you reply here. AviationFreak💬 07:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:AviationFreak Thanks for the comprehensive response. I am assuming that being the first Indian Female Konrad Adeneur Fellow, or being recognised as Emerging Leader in Asian Journalism by KAS, or being the Editor / Head of digital media of an international news portal does not qualify for notability parameters. Noted, thanks Aban0001 (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:41:08, 24 January 2021 review of submission by Ajjj11

[edit]

I have been trying to get this page online but every time I am not able to do it. Please review the article and help me taking it public. The person mentioned in the article has been contributing his bit to the film industry, having worked for more than a decade and 20 plus films. Having mentioned all the sufficient references still the article keeps declining. Please review it and help me know what stuff is missing in the article. Ajjj11 (talk) 14:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for it to be reviewed. You've been declined only once, and you just submitted it for a second time eight minutes ago. Posting here will not speed up the process. Pahunkat (talk) 15:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined for a third time, with a warning that continued submission without radical improvement will be treated as tendentious editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:15:52, 24 January 2021 review of submission by Jackignore

[edit]

Hello guys, I am new to wikipedia. I don't know why this article rejected. Can you please help me? Thanks. Is there a way to make it eligible? Jackignore (talk) 15:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jackignore The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. As noted on your draft, it appears that the person does not meet Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. Please read Your first article. 331dot (talk) 18:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know but Hackernoon is a news website and it's also in wikipedia and google news. How can I make that article notable?Jackignore (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackignore:. The nature of Hackernoon, and whether it is in Wikipedia or is indexed by Google News is irrelevant. The cited Hackernoon pages were written by Nima Owji. Nothing written by him can demonstrate that he is notable. The draft has been rejected because no amount of editing can make the topic acceptable. Therefore volunteers do not intend to review it again. Move on to a different topic, or consider alternative outlets, with different inclusion criteria, for your writing. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jackignore, Hackermoon may be notable but notability is not inherited. JavaHurricane 15:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:39:54, 24 January 2021 review of submission by Ishan3011

[edit]


Ishan3011 (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:43:23, 24 January 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Harriett Type

[edit]


I want my deleted wiki page to be reinstated so that I can fix it according to the feedback that I received from the reviewer. I understand the comments and will fix the content.

Harriett Type (talk) 21:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unambiguous copyright infringement is unlikely to be reinstated. Theroadislong (talk) 21:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can safely say it is more than unlikely, the chances are close to zero. You can't "fix" a copyright violation. 331dot (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:05:10, 24 January 2021 review of submission by 79.97.141.188

[edit]

The content of this submission is verifiably factual, and undisputed 79.97.141.188 (talk) 22:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But rejected many times as not notable evidently. Theroadislong (talk) 22:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:04:46, 24 January 2021 review of submission by LeGoldenBoots

[edit]


LeGoldenBoots (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. The subject's own website and LinkedIn do not count a whit for notability as Wikipedia defines the term. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 23:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know and I didn't write his LinkedIn and Website as a refrence. I only refrenced Hackernooon. It's on Wikipedia too!Jackignore (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_January_24&oldid=1003657949"