Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 April 27
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 26 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 28 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
April 27
[edit]08:11:46, 27 April 2021 review of submission by SamTheHam666
[edit]- SamTheHam666 (talk · contribs)
SamTheHam666 (talk) 08:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
All the sources and information was verified by the person who I was writing about girlfriend as I didn't want to have false information and everything was incorrect, I decided to correct that information. There aren't any articles on him at the current time - but he is starting to become bigger. This was a birthday gift for him and his girlfriend had asked me to try make and design a wikipedia page but everything is 100% factual on that page. I really do hope you accept my submission as I am willing to try my hardest to improve the page and get more information out there. I would really appreciate if you allowed to look into my submission one more time for 'The Darts Referee'. Following information has been shown as well, his YouTube channel holds some information about his YouTubing and Socialblade information - and that the other information comes from a reliable source.
- I am afraid that personal knowledge is not accepted as a source because nobody can verify it - If I would tell you that I am Joe Biden (even though I am totally not) you also can choose wether you would believe that or (more likely) you don't believe that. The subject's youtube channel can be used in limited ways described by WP:ABOUTSELF. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- The draft contains no content that is attributed to reliable sources, and is therefore not suitable for this encyclopedia. --Kinu t/c 17:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
09:25:15, 27 April 2021 review of submission by Shatbhisha6
[edit]- Shatbhisha6 (talk · contribs)
Shatbhisha6 (talk) 09:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Suffucient, independent, renowned media articles have been attached for notability, while no reason being given for declining on the grounds of notability. Is it possible to be reviewed by another set of reviwers. I would request a debate with more participant on the reason for declining the article and also removing the source links. Shatbhisha6 (talk) 09:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Shatbhisha6 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Shopping around until you get someone to tell you what you want to hear does not usually work. As noted, the draft was rejected because it appears that the person does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. You have a great number of sources and though it may sound odd, that's actually a negative and an indication that the sources themselves are inadequate(so you need a lot of them to make up for it) We would rather see a smaller number of reliable sources with significant coverage than a great number of sources with less significant coverage. The sources you offer are all brief mentions or quotes/interviews with him, that does not establish notability. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
The sources include news articles from leading dailies and are more than brief mentions or quotes/interviews. Does the following article not establish notability? PM Modi phones Swami Avdheshanand Giri, requests symbolic participation in Kumbh Mela amid Covid-19 scare". www.timesnownews.com. Shatbhisha6 (talk) 11:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Shatbhisha6, since I was the reviewer, you should have contacted me first before raising your concerns in multiple noticeboards. Brief mentions in interviews are not sufficient to establish WP:GNG. Please provide atleast any one best sources giving him the enough sigcov and lets see what we can do. Regards. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 18:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
10:15:58, 27 April 2021 review of submission by Admusicnews
[edit]- Admusicnews (talk · contribs)
Admusicnews (talk) 10:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Draft deleted, user blocked. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
14:08:53, 27 April 2021 review of draft by Rednikki
[edit]
Hello! This page has been flagged as not coming from a neutral point of view and using poor sources. I am not clear what is causing the issue and was hoping for guidance. I used pages such as Jesse Genet, Cindy Eckert, Emily Weiss and Estée_Lauder_(businesswoman) as models for this page, and I focused on sources from major, fact-checked publications such as BizJournal, People and The Miami Herald as well as industry publications. I did try to find negative things about her in order to make it properly balanced but there's not much at all out there that is negative. This is the first page in my effort to create pages about female beauty entrepreneurs, and I would like to get it right so that my future pages will be better! Rednikki (talk) 14:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Rednikki (talk) 14:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
14:15:45, 27 April 2021 review of submission by 105.66.5.210
[edit]- 105.66.5.210 (talk · contribs)
Hello there, I'm creating a wiki page for my artist project and I got declined 2 times right away, I signed songs to major publishers like UMG & Sony ATV, I got played on major local radio stations, I got my music played on the biggest EDM festival in France, got supported by Grammy awarded and nominees artists did an official remix of the biggest EDM music label in Germany then got my remix featured on the biggest EDM CD compilation there.
So I wanted to know how can I get it done? At the beginning of the creation, i did the declaration thing that I'm doing it for my self and I need help so hopefully, somebody over here can help
105.66.5.210 (talk) 14:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
14:35:12, 27 April 2021 review of submission by Chiara Milani
[edit]I want to know where and what I have to change in the draft to see my article pubblished Chiara Milani (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Your draft Draft:CAREL INDUSTRIES S.p.A. was declined because the few references there are do not show that your company passes WP:NCORP, it is written like an advertisement, see WP:SOLUTIONS for example. You also re-submitted the draft with no changes which is considered disruptive. Theroadislong (talk) 14:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
16:19:31, 27 April 2021 review of submission by Giuseppe Ardolino
[edit]
Hello, I already submitted this draft and it has been declined. I would like to know in which section I need to improve in order to respect Wikipedia's guidelines and try to publish it. I already followed some feedback but the draft is considered not in line with a neutral approach, and I want to understand the reasons. I am available to make all necessary changes. Really thanks for your availability
Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
17:23:17, 27 April 2021 review of submission by Kohakinori
[edit]- Kohakinori (talk · contribs)
Kohakinori (talk) 17:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm looking at this article and trying to get it reviewed. Any changes that I can make (other than what I;ve already done) to improve?
- Kohakinori The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability. 331dot (talk) 17:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
19:44:27, 27 April 2021 review of submission by Joey pounds
[edit]- Joey pounds (talk · contribs)
Fulton Art Fair: need to understand what i need to do get page publish. Also how can i improve page info while waiting for review.
Joey pounds (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Joey pounds (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Joey pounds (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Joey pounds Wikipedia article summarize what independent reliable sources state; Wikipedia articles cannot be used to cite other Wikipedia articles because Wikipedia is not a reliable source. The draft reads as a promotional text for the Fair, instead of summarizing what independent sources say. 331dot (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- It is also a copyright violation of [1] so I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand what i have done incorrect. Please help me. What need to be fixed?