User talk:Giuseppe Ardolino

Hi Giuseppe, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your interest in contributing. I saw your question at the Reference Desk and wanted to let you know that the best place to ask for help is actually Wikipedia:Teahouse. The people there are experienced with how to help. There may be quite a few steps to go through to do with conflict-of-interest rules and rules about promoting companies - rules like these are probably the reason why a tag was put on your draft. Ask the Teahouse anything you need to know about this and they will be able to help. 70.67.193.176 (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Teahouse, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. At the top of that talk page it says: "This page is where editors discuss how to keep the Teahouse running smoothly. If you have a question about how Wikipedia works or need help with editing, please click here to go to the Teahouse Q&A forum." David Biddulph (talk) 13:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you David Biddulph (talk), please could you indicate a wiki page where I can ask some feedback for my trial sandbox ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giuseppe_Ardolino/sandbox)? I would like to receive some improvements (if there are) before the publication. Thank you Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I think I see - Giuseppe, I know it looks confusing, but the "Talk" tab at the top of a page is actually a behind-the-scenes tab. Sorry about that. It seems logical that you would use it, but unfortunately that's why people keep saying you are not in the right place.

Let me begin again: To ask your question at the Teahouse, first click on Wikipedia:Teahouse, then click on the big blue button in the middle of the page that says "Ask a question". That should get you where you need to be! 70.67.193.176 (talk) 19:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 70.67.193.176 (talk) thanks for your support, I really appreciated. I followed your guide and I published my question and sandbox to review in Teahouse area. I hope now it's ok. Thank you [User:Giuseppe Ardolino|Giuseppe Ardolino]] (talk) 09:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 70.67.193.176 (talk), sorry for disturb. I have just a question. I followed your advice and I wrote in Testhouse Area, but today I noticed that my topic has been cancelled, you know why? I have some updates and I wanted to continued the discussion of my topics. Is it necessary to open another topic? Thank you for your collaboration and support Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Giuseppe Ardolino! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Company page Sadas wih new references, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Giuseppe Ardolino! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sadas Company description - Feedback request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Giuseppe Ardolino! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sadas - Company description - Feedback request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Giuseppe Ardolino! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sadas DB - Company description - Feedback request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a conflict of interest

Hello Giuseppe Ardolino, thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest on your userpage. But please avoid editing any affected mainspace articles or lists, and use edit requests and draftspace to suggest sourced changes. A list entry may seem relatively minor, but it is still an addition that increases visibility for a given entry. Such additions should only be done by uninvolved editors (and only when a properly sourced and reviewed mainspace article exists). GermanJoe (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GermanJoe , thank you for your message. Please can you show me what is the section "use edit requests" Thank you for your collaboration }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Request edit and Template:Request edit/Instructions, Giuseppe Ardolino. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DES. I added a Request edit into a new section of this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_column-oriented_DBMSes, in accordance with suggested guidelines. I hope it's all ok and that I have a response soon. Thank you again }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 09:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You missed that GermanJoe said that an item should be added to such a list only when a properly sourced and reviewed mainspace article exists. In short the article must come first. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DES, I added 3 articles as a source, aren't they correct? Thank you }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 09:56, 25September 2020 (UTC)

You need to undserstand that an itemm is not added to a list such as List_of_column-oriented_DBMSes until after an article about that product, not a draft but an approved article, already exists. As for I added 3 articles as a source I am not sure what additions you refer to. I still do not see in User:Giuseppe Ardolino/sandbox any citations to independent sources with significant coverage much less three such sources. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 19:49, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DES, concerning my sources I mentioned these ones to support Sadas Engine as column-oriented DBMS:

Maybe I inserted this article in the wrong way? or The problem is related to the accuracy of the articles? Thank you so much for collaboration }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't paying attention.

No new entry will be accepted in the list until there is first an article about the DBMS.
The draft will not be accepted as an article until there are multiple independent] reliable sources that include significant coverage of the subject. The above sources do not qualify. Most are not independent. Others do not include significant coverage.
The problem is not accuracy, it is the lack of independence of the sources. Nothing affiliated with Sadus is independent, even it it is external. No client of Sadus is independent.

I hope that is clear. Don't bother asking again if those same sources are good enough. They are not and won't be. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DES, thank for your reply. I don't want to bother anyone, I ask just to be sure that I am improving my comprehension and knowledge to publish on Wikipedia. Thanks }} Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadas (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sadas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sadas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 17:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Giuseppe Ardolino! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noahfgodard (talk) 17:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Giuseppe Ardolino. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Giuseppe Ardolino. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Giuseppe Ardolino|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 18:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong (talk), first of all, I want to thank you for your feedback and help. I can confirm that I don't receive any compensation for the page's editing. My draft is a company page and not an article. Anyway from the beginning when I created my profile, thanks to Wikipedia's suggestions, I wrote on my profile page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Giuseppe_Ardolino) my relation with Sadas, in order to start the development of this page. Please, could you show me the mandatory steps for publication? and which part of the page needs changes. I really thank you and have a great weekend. Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong (talk), how are you? I hope well. I would kindly ask you for some feedback about my previous message on how to improve and publish the page. Thank you so much Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You say "My draft is a company page and not an article" Wikipedia doesn't host "company" pages it has articles about notable topics. Theroadislong (talk) 10:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong (talk), thanks for your reply. I mean that my draft page is written to publish news about an important player in the ICT sector. I set up my draft page using Wikipedia contributor's feedbacks, studying Wikipedia's guidelines and other correlated pages (such as Oracle, MongoDB, etc.) Please, could you indicate to me what's wrong with my draft? in order to improve and publish. Really thanks for your support. Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 15:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have clearly miss-understood what Wikipedia is! We don't publish "news" about anything. Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong (talk), maybe I used the wrong words, but I mean that I wrote my draft using guidelines in order to publish a draft page with typical encyclopedia items. I am trying to improve my draft/article to contribute Wikipedia free online encyclopedia for the ICT and DBMS section. Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft reads like an advertisement which is why it was declined. Wikipedia is not a venue for promoting your business. Theroadislong (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong (talk), thanks for the reply. Sadas is not my business. Please could you please indicate to me which sentences of my draft page result as an advertisement? In this way, I can improve and re-write my draft in a better and punctual way. Thank you for your support Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You work for them and you say on your user page that "This is an account that I have set up to introduce the new page on Sadas company to explain its history, market, and clients" Wikipedia is NOT here for that purpose and see WP:NCORP for criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong (talk), thanks for your reply. I know and as suggested by other Wikipedia contributors I declared that I am totally unbiased and have not conflict of interests in order to respect Wikipedia's guidelines. Considering your reply, Have I requirements to write and publish these articles in an encyclopedia way? or the only way is external contributors that will publish articles related to Sadas? Thank you for your support, really appreciated it. Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong (talk), have you some feedback for my last question, please? I would like to define the next steps necessary to publish my draft in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you for your support and availability, have a nice evening Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 15:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong (talk), do you have some feedback about my info request? Otherwise, Could you indicate to me who can support me, in order to improve my draft page and publish it. Thank you Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I have no interest in helping you create an article for your company. You could try asking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sadas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sadas. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sadas

Hello, Giuseppe Ardolino. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sadas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]