Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 June 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 4 << May | June | Jul >> June 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 5

[edit]

01:49:21, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Jamescarter19914

[edit]

As we had the verified page and has been removed by google please review and update me. Jamescarter19914 (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04:21:18, 5 June 2020 review of submission by User:Liberma19

[edit]

This article was labeled as UPE. I saw the talkpage has a disclosure already. Can this be moved out from draft to the main article already? Thank you.

User:Liberma19 - I've changed the tag from Undisclosed paid editing to conflict of interest. I suggest that investment in the company's web site, which you can control, is a better use of resources than trying to write something in Wikipedia that is both neutral and promotional at the same time. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:Robert McClenon, thank you for your assistance. Kindly review the article and talkpage again. I have already disclosed all accounts involved in that article's talkpage and in their corresponding userpage/talkpages, including mine. Also, I saw someone edited the article to improve notability. Hopefully, someone can assist on moving this drafted article for publishing. Thank you. Antagonizer05 (talk) 05:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:09:01, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Shajeeralinv

[edit]


Shajeeralinv (talk) 07:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify why this is rejected

07:14:43, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Shajeeralinv

[edit]


Mr. Punnayurkulam V Bappu was a great mappila poet and he wrote mapplila songs in saskrit. He was my grand uncle and I personally seen his handwritten books with my father. Also his details are enlisted at Mahakavi Moyinkutty Vaidyar Smarakam, Kondotty. Hence I request you to publish this article. Shajeeralinv (talk) 07:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to happen, at least this time:

Request on 08:06:00, 5 June 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Communication.scac

[edit]


Hello,

I would like to get an explanation regarding the rejection of my submission of an article on Voilah! Festival on Wikipedia. Could you please let me know what I did wrong so to correct it?

Regards, Department for Culture, Education and Science Embassy of France in Singapore 101-103 Cluny Park Road, Singapore 259595

T +65 6880 7827 M + 65 9653 5069 sg.ambafrance.org / voilah.sg Communication.scac (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC) Communication.scac (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Communication.scac, well it is clearly explained in the declining message of your draft, please follow the links given within the message... - if you have any more questions you should contact the Decliner himself User:Theroadislong CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:07:15, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Feng Mantian

[edit]

I don't know why my submission is declined. Could anyone help me with the adjustment? Thank you. We Love wikipedia!!!! But we are not that smart to finish this submission. Thank you for your kind help.

Feng Mantian (talk) 08:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feng Mantian You wrote a promotional page about yourself, which has now been deleted. Please review the autobiography policy as to why autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:26:35, 5 June 2020 review of submission by 92.249.179.89

[edit]


92.249.179.89 (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hy,

Can you help me? I do not really know what is the problem with the article. I put all off the reference that has, but all of is Hungarian.

References do not need to be in English- and that is not the issue anyway. Please review the posts made by reviewers on the draft. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:10:11, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Leckson58

[edit]

Hi,

The page I submitted for review was declined due to notability and that it reads more like an advertisement than a wiki entry. I've edited the page and I added some few references too. Please help me review it before I resubmit it for approval.

The references I used include: Financial times, Bloomberg company profile, Health Business UK magazine, The National AE newspaper, Proactive Investors UK and Live trading news etc. All of which are not press releases and they discuss the subject in some detail and not passing mentions.


Leckson (talk) 10:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:20:33, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Theomarquezofficial

[edit]


My Own Article must be accepted and Publish it

Theomarquezofficial (talk) 10:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theomarquezofficial You wrote a promotional page about yourself, which has now been deleted. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. Wikipedia only summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about (in this case) musicians that are shown to meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable musician. Wikipedia has no interest in aiding your career or helping your fans. You are welcome to write about subjects other than yourself. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


11:20:49, 5 June 2020 review of draft by GSS

[edit]


I have a question regarding notability. This author has been cited by her peers in lots of scholarly articles, I think she should pass notability. These can be verified from here. Should I need to add all citations regarding her from scholar? Only availability is enough? RRRW (talk) 11:20, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RRRW You need to provide the citations, a link to a Google search is not sufficient. If you are a paid editor or otherwise represent the subject of the article, you must review WP:COI and WP:PAID before further edits. 331dot (talk) 11:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please note as per some off-wiki evidence RRRW was hired to update Institut auf dem Rosenberg and they failed to disclose. I have shared the evidence with Yunshui. GSS 💬 11:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have any coi with Eivor_Martinus. This subject has coi with user:Alamex who disclosed on their userpage. - RRRW (talk) 11:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:24:33, 5 June 2020 review of submission by 2A01:4B00:E40D:4000:35A1:D7B2:D5E1:551C

[edit]


2A01:4B00:E40D:4000:35A1:D7B2:D5E1:551C (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for a re-review as the last error said it was too promotional.


13:55:45, 5 June 2020 review of draft by SChannell

[edit]


117.230.151.13 (talk) 03:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:55:45, 5 June 2020 review of draft by SChannell

[edit]


{{Db-g7}} I was unable to upload diagrams because there is a defect with the image updload filtering that marked BPMN diagrams as unsuitable for wikipedia commons. I've published to my blog instead (https://www.cepheis.com/blog/pathwise-complexity)

SChannell (talk) 13:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SChannell: this page is completely unsourced. Therefore, the image problems are academic problems you can care about when the draft is properly sourced. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware that the mandate of wikipedia had changed from an encyclopedia to an index, I'll consider updating wikipedia once it has been published elsewhere

@117.230.151.13 and SChannell:We had this literally yesterday. Sourceing still hasnt improved. Please read WP:OR. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:18:10, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Hasibromi

[edit]

I am requesting a re-review, Because I think the page now met the notability criteria. Hasibromi (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you suggest which part of the criteria here WP:MUSICIAN they pass? Theroadislong (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong, I'm looking at the sources--god it's terrible. I didn't know that rap also had this industry where press releases and promotional writing was regurgitated in this way. This piece of puff is copied verbatim here; this is a good reason not to take Medium seriously; this "online news entity" is a joke, and the article in that "news entity" is just some promotional shit of the kind we see here on Wikipedia too. Check it:

But his huge success came with his first album release, i.e., The Travels of Marco. It had the potential of being the best upcoming star album. The content of the album is as the Title suggests. It deals with the travels of Marco. This album contains 13 tracks that follow Marco’s life through trials and tribulations.

There was no "huge success, of course, and that stuff about content and title, that's hilarious. Anyway, Hasibromi, I'm sorry, but I don't see how any of those publications are acceptable per WP:RS. Drmies (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I didn't know we were still this sexist in the music industry. It's pretty gross. Drmies (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:23:55, 5 June 2020 review of submission by 173.176.137.104

[edit]

This person is famous among all Iranians! I don't understand what is your personal problem with him. As I talked to you on live chat, you don't give any specific reason. if you don't know the person, it doesn't mean that he is not famous. before rejecting you can search about him. his information is totally same as the other Iranian rappers. 173.176.137.104 (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is surely no personal problem but your subject lacks of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. Please have a close look at Wikipedia:Notability_(music), your subject of matter does not really fulfil any of the criteria mentioned there, at least like it is written in your draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
173.176.137.104, I wish you would try to write that up neutrally. Drmies (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:04:42, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Gidicloud

[edit]


Gidicloud (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please what exactly do I need to do to make this content "sellbeta" approved? is it because no notable reference just let me know please.

17:38, 5 June 2020 331dot talk contribs blocked Gidicloud talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) ({{uw-spamublock}} <!-- Promotional username, promotional edits -->). Since the draft has been deleted in the meantime for g11, there is nothing left to see here. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:44:45, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Sa 3003

[edit]


Sa 3003 (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge how the previous write-up of this article sounded biased and not encyclopedia-like as the standard is on Wikipedia. Thus, I've taken out a line of the proposed draft that seemed promotional and changed around another part of the wording. I believe that now the entry reads as more fitting to be in an encyclopedia. Please let me know if there are any other steps I can take to help get this article published. Thanks so much!


16:28:39, 5 June 2020 review of draft by Ggent

[edit]


Hi, I would like to get some guidance on how to improve this article sourcing and clarification of WP:ROUTINE policy. I understood the policy to mean that run-of-the-mill events do not qualify for notability, but I thought that sources highlighting the subject at hand, in trade publications, are evidence of notability. Are there issues with specific text and sources here, or are all the sources, in totality, not sufficient to establish notability? Thanks very much. Ggent (talk) 22:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:24:11, 5 June 2020 review of submission by DRUMMER GANI

[edit]


DRUMMER GANI (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has no WP:RELIABLE sources. The editor was twice declined and requested to provide WP:RELIABLE sources and also advised not include social-media links and references. The editor was also told and provided links on how to cite references in Wikipedia, but the editor seems to ignore all the loopholes. The present form only promotes the person. The draft is also not notable as per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:TOOSOON. Wikipedia is not a place for WP:PROMOTION. ~ Amkgp ✉ 18:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:36:41, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Therahuljaiswal

[edit]


Therahuljaiswal (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The editor is only engaged in WP:PROMOTIONAL drafts. The queried draft lacks notability as per WP:MUSIC WP:NALBUM, it is released today only as per this and is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Also to be noted, that apart from this the editor is also trying to submit drafts that promotes person of not importance. See Draft:Aryan raj singh and the diff. ~ Amkgp ✉ 18:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:28:41, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Mtahir0007

[edit]

Hi I have published all relevant information about a Naat Reciter Mr. Qari Zubaid Rasool, we only have his Naats uploaded in you tube, can you please tell me what other references you need? We have very limited information available about him. There is one Wikipedia article already there in Urdu Language but if you search in English you will not find anything. So I have added info so English user can also see. Mtahir0007 (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mtahir0007, Please specify the draft ~ Amkgp ✉ 19:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are referring to Draft:Qari Zubaid Rasool. The draft needs to be notable as per English Wikipedia guidelines. Please avoid YouTube as a references as WP:YTREF policy. You need to provide WP:RELIABLE sources as references to you draft to verify/prove its notability and pass the criteria for inclusion in main-space. You can visit WP:REFB if you are unaware how to add references in the draft/article. ~ Amkgp ✉ 19:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:22:14, 5 June 2020 review of submission by DRUMMER GANI

[edit]


I have provided all valid information about Sanika Kulkarni with news paper articles, program links and various links that describe that Sanika Kulkarni is a sensation in singing and deserves a Wikipedia page. All the contents mentioned and links attached are 100% authentic. Request you to activate page with name Sanika Kulkarni. Thank You!!! Yours Truly


DRUMMER GANI (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well DRUMMER GANI, as the reviewer already stated Wikipedia is not the place for promoting young artists and the given references are not reliable to state any kind of notability. I would have rejected your draft, too. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DRUMMER GANI, Please refer this for the reasons for 'rejection'. ~ Amkgp ✉ 20:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Read "Up and coming next big thing" and "Nobody cares about your garage band". The latter is more Western in details, but the spirit is global. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DRUMMER GANI, Are you writing the draft about yourself ? ~ Amkgp ✉ 20:47, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:08:47, 5 June 2020 review of submission by SONGEZO SA

[edit]


SONGEZO SA (talk) 23:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


23:14:03, 5 June 2020 review of submission by Jxs28a

[edit]


If I understand the reason for rejection correctly, I do not have a COI that needs to be disclosed. What else should I do?

Thanks. Jxs28a (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_June_5&oldid=985275609"