User talk:Sa 3003

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sa 3003. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard Wilkinson (whistleblower) has been accepted

Howard Wilkinson (whistleblower), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep^Talk 10:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex "Sasha" Chepurko (December 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: this is an attempt by a law firm to advertise itself by writing an article on one of its clients. WP does not do that

DGG ( talk ) 23:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sa 3003! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 23:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 26-JAN-2020

Hello! I have reverted the changes you made to your edit request at Talk:Bunny Greenhouse because those changes were not inline with the guidelines for altering previous talk page posts found at WP:REDACTED.

Those guidelines state that whenever another editor has posted a message after you, any changes made to your older posts need to use underlined font for additions and ~~strikeout font~~ for deletions.

Please take care to add the missing information using only those guidelines, or as an alternative, to place the missing information within a new edit request placed at the bottom of the talk page. Thank you for your help! Regards, Spintendo 00:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 8-FEB-2020 (2nd notice)

Hello! I have reverted the changes you made to your edit request at Talk:David K. Colapinto because those changes were not inline with the guidelines for altering previous talk page posts found at WP:REDACTED.

Those guidelines state that whenever another editor has posted a message after you, any changes made to your older posts need to use underlined font for additions and ~~strikeout font~~ for deletions.

Please take care to add the missing information using only those guidelines, or as an alternative, to place the missing information within a new edit request placed at the bottom of the talk page.

I've gone ahead and made the change to the infobox as you requested. However, please note that this is the second time you have needed to be made aware of the guidelines for making changes to talk page posts. Further refusal to abide by those guidelines may incur additional actions up to and including a loss of editing privileges. Regards, Spintendo 05:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Westrick (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Westrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Westrick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alex "Sasha" Chepurko has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alex "Sasha" Chepurko. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Westrick (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One whistleblower incident, with just one spike of media coverage in 2018, does not satisfy WP:BIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Westrick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Westrick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 05:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alex "Sasha" Chepurko

Hello, Sa 3003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex "Sasha" Chepurko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aaron Westrick

Hello, Sa 3003. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aaron Westrick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aaron Westrick

Hello, Sa 3003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aaron Westrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! 5a5ha seven (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of FBI whistleblowers has been accepted

List of FBI whistleblowers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BusterD (talk) 03:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]