Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 August 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< August 8 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 9

[edit]

00:08:54, 9 August 2020 review of draft by Daddina857

[edit]


Daddina857 (talk) 00:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daddina857, please ask a question. Fiddle Faddle 10:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:42:06, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Core i3-4150

[edit]


Core i3-4150 (talk) 05:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't paid, I was requested by Groundwire to write an article about them, This was my first article, so I was confused what should I choose and how should I code, After seeing others article's code, I was able to write an article for them, After writing an article for them, I summited it for review and they rejected it, I want to request Wikipedia to accepted that article so that it might be helpful to others, Groundwire is not a Paid services or for-profit service, it is a not-for-profit service, Groundwire isn't making any money.

Faithfully, Core i3-4150 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Core i3-4150 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Core i3-4150, if asked by them to write an article about them then you have, ipso facto, a conflict of interest, and must declare it both on the talk page of the draft using {{connected contributor}} and on your user page using, for example, {{UserboxCOI}}. This removes any potential accusations against your work.
For any article about an organisation we require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make any draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle Faddle 10:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

06:52:32, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Shri04

[edit]


i am shrihari Shri04 (talk) 06:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)--Shri04 (talk) 06:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shri04, please read WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA Fiddle Faddle 10:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:13:53, 9 August 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Keble6

[edit]


I would like some guidance on how to make the article eligible. The company which is the subject of the article is already refrenced by an existing Wikipedia article, has an excelent track record of patents and innovation, and has a place in the history of RFID and NFC technologies. The company no longer exists, so this is definitely not a vanity article!

Keble6 (talk) 07:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keble6, I will leave comments on the draft itself Fiddle Faddle 10:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Fiddle Faddle 10:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07:19:52, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Basimji zulfkar

[edit]


Basimji zulfkar (talk) 07:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basimji zulfkar You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 07:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:30:58, 9 August 2020 review of draft by TrueBlue5419

[edit]


hello i need to know how can i publish article for my father who is a film producer in India. i did not understand the above message. please help TrueBlue5419 (talk) 08:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You will need better sources, IMDb is NOT a reliable source for establishing notability, your references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:37:30, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Dezignme

[edit]


Dezignme (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Dezignme: Tiktok and other social media arent considered reliable. See WP:42 for what Wikipedia articles must have. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:31:49, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Tbound2

[edit]


Tbound2 (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get this page accepted and published?

Start by finding at least three reliable, independent sources that discuss her in depth. Theroadislong (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:32:40, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Tbound2

[edit]


Tbound2 (talk) 09:32, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I get this page accepted and published


10:21:55, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Ankitjdv

[edit]

Cause I am writing about harnoor singh who is an YouTube personality, Known as Singh in USA. He had done lots of notables thing therefore i am writing this article so i request you please approve this article.

Ankitjdv (talk) 10:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ankitjdv, For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make any draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle Faddle 10:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:56:31, 9 August 2020 review of submission by 176.54.136.112

11:56:31, 9 August 2020 review of draft by 176.54.136.112

[edit]


176.54.136.112 (talk) 11:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Fiddle Faddle 11:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.

14:39:38, 9 August 2020 review of draft by Tjk ken

[edit]


My article is being rejecting due to the fact that i cannot meet up with the musician criteria, but my aritcle is true and real maybe the organisation is not known world wide yet but down here there're the talk of the street. Tjk ken (talk) 14:39, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In order to qualify for an article on Wikipedida, there must be independent, reliable sources that show the notability of the subject. Until such sources are found the article isn't going to pass. Pi (Talk to me!) 16:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:48:39, 9 August 2020 review of submission by CHURCHIL JERIN

[edit]


CHURCHIL JERIN (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has been rejected, it won't be considered further, it has zero reliable independent sources that discuss the topic in-depth, so no evidence of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 15:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CHURCHIL JERIN: Your draft has zero reliable sources so that the content can be verified. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Inception 111

[edit]

Hello, in regards to Bahman Tavoosipage, I have numerous times mentioned that not getting paid but don't understand why Wikipedia is giving us hard time to the editors?!! Please remove the message from his page so I can present my work on Wikipedia, thanks so much. This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. (July 2020) Inception 111 (talk) 15:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Inception 111[reply]

@Inception 111: Wikipedia editors protect the site from those who receive money for their edits. I have asked the editor who tagged the article for their thoughts. You will have received notification of that, I think. Note, please, that this is not an accusation. It is a precaution. Fiddle Faddle 17:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not making any allegations but 99% of Inception's edits are related to the subject. SK2242 (talk) 21:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:41:01, 9 August 2020 review of draft by Peter Pudev

[edit]


I am writing an article about the village of Lilkovo. I have gathered a lot of sources of information and can write a lot, but this is my first article in Wikipedia and I am not sure whether I am doing everything right or I am simply waisting my time by creating a draft that will never be reviewed and published for others to read. Do I necessarily have to add a wikiproject to the top of the article? If yes, how exactly do I do it? (I am not very good with computer languages (e.g., ~![{{word}}???) Peter Pudev (talk)

Peter Pudev We review all drafts, no exceptions. It can be instant or it can take a short while before we get to them. Fiddle Faddle 21:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:07:04, 9 August 2020 review of submission by Edwardwdpeck

[edit]



I have re-edited the article and added the required reference that was suggested, but it appears the article has not yet been uploaded. Can you tell me what additional information needs to be added? Or is it simply an oversight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardwdpeck (talk • contribs) 21:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edwardwdpeck, Are we speaking of Draft:Dornacilla Drysdale? If so it has languished, unsubmitted, for a year. Would you like it resubmitted? Fiddle Faddle 21:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would like to have it resubmitted.

Edwardwdpeck, I have left substantial comment on this draft for you to consider. There is research to do, as listed there. Undone, nothing will happen unless someone else taked an interest in it. Fiddle Faddle 21:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for the comments but it has been some time since I last navigated the site, so have not yet found the comments.

@Edwardwdpeck: Go to Draft:Dornacilla Drysdale and search for the word "Comment". There are three of them just below the large pink box at the top of the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:56:58, 9 August 2020 review of draft by Elyght

[edit]


Hi! I'm trying to make a Wikipedia page for UNC Charlotte's Urban Institute, but I was recently told that too many of my resources are directly from the university. However, the problem is, most of the historical information that I provide on the page can only be found through links affiliated with the university. So, would you have any recommendations for finding a wider breadth of resources for the page, or other information that could be included so that my submission doesn't get rejected again? Thanks!

Elyght (talk) 23:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elyght If the Institute is not written about by independent reliable sources offering significant coverage of the Institute, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization, it would not merit an article at this time. Wikipedia is not interested in what the Institute says about itself or what it considers to be its own history. It is only interested in what others say about the Institute. For example, Harvard University merits an article not because it keeps an extensive history of itself, but because independent sources do. Primary sources are acceptable only in limited circumstances- and never to establish notability. 331dot (talk) 00:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_August_9&oldid=985274232"