Help desk
< May 22	<< Apr \| May \| Jun >>	May 24 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

May 23

09:59:05, 23 May 2015 review of submission by Systemupdate101

Systemupdate101 (talk · contribs)

Please help me to approve my page, im new for this. I want my friend get this page because she has many posers. Please help us. How we can add more reference for her? Thank you so much and God bless. Keep safe always.

Systemupdate101 (talk) 09:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Systemupdate101: If the article is to be approved, it will need a lot more references demonstrating her notability. Wikipedia doesn't allow articles on subjects merely because of the existence of poseurs. Instead, subjects must be notable, and right now it does not seem as if Anne Lopez is notable because they have not received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If you can find references meeting that criteria, please add them to the article. (You can read WP:REFB to learn more about how to reference on Wikipedia.) /wia /talk 12:32, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:33:37, 23 May 2015 review of submission by Bbosramek

Bbosramek (talk · contribs)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please help: The article has been rejected because it contains copyright information. However, I am the author of both the copyrighted Hemodynamic Management Chart at the Hemodynamic Society web site (I am the Chairman of the Society), and the medical textbook "Systemic Hemodynamics and Hemodynamic Management", listed in the references. Should I issue a permission to myself to use it in the Wikipedia article? How to proceed?

Bbosramek (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bdosramek: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials will help you understand what steps to take. Another page you may find pertinent while working on your draft is Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable. Worldbruce (talk) 17:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bbosramek, you can also get more specific assistance from WT:WikiProject Medicine. That's where the editors who have experience with medical articles on Wikipedia can be found. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:18:28, 23 May 2015 review of submission by 81belle

81belle (talk · contribs)

I have been repeatedly revising and re-editing this article based upon the feedback I've gotten (see my talk page). We finally sorted out the photograph troubles this past April. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND why this article is STILL IN LIMBO and not either published or refused with explanation. Would somebody please do something? 81belle (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)81belle 81belle (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@81belle: Let me try to explain. We are all volunteers, and we do things that we want to do and when we want to do them. It would have been put pleasure to review your draft if you had actually submitted it for review. In this edit you removed the review history and thus removed your easy ability to resubmit the draft. I am about to restore that for you.

Please do not use all capitals. It is poor netiquette and is considered to be shouting. It does not endear your work to anyone. All you have ever had to do is to ask nicely Fiddle Faddle 21:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TimTrent: Thank you for your response. Thank you for restoring the history (although I don't know how it was lost, I never touched it; only the actual article and the *save page* button. Now that this information is returned, please tell me what I should do next as this whole process has made me gun-shy about trying to do anything more by relying solely on the Wikipedia printed instructions and not someone's personal instruction. I could certainly use your help as to how to proceed from this point on. Thank you again. 81belle (talk) 13:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)81belle[reply]

@81belle: I suggest you simply resubmit and trust the reviews you receive. It is intended to be an iterative process of improvement. You simply overwrote the review history. It happens. Fiddle Faddle 15:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]