Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 June 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 11 << May | June | Jul >> June 13 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 12

[edit]

19:41:01, 11 June 2014 review of submission by Kendeyl

[edit]

HELP! I hired someone to help me edit my page and he STOLE it and put it live under his name. This is unethical and he did not do the work!

(cur | prev) 15:40, 10 June 2014‎ Lyndasim (talk | contribs)‎ . . (5,079 bytes) (+5,079)‎ . . (←Created page with ' Microjobs are companies that are in relations between employer and advertisers for minor stains on the Internet, such as writing artic...') (thank)

How can I get his page deleted and resubmit it under my name?

Thanks for your help.

The edited page is below:

Micro Jobs

Micro jobs are temporary task-type jobs of all types. These jobs are booked through the Internet. Work may include online or in-person jobs, such as writing articles, translating text, virtual assistant, handyman, nanny, dog-sitter or errand-runner, etc.[1] The income varies depending on the job and the commission charged by the micro jobs website. Contents 

 [hide]

• 1 History • 2 Controversies • 3 Advantages • 4 Disadvantages • 5 See also • 6 References History[edit] World War II sparked the beginning of temporary work, when housewives were employed to fill jobs vacated by men deployed to war. Employers found temporary workers attractive, as they could be hired as needed and often worked hours which did not require payment of benefits and detailed paperwork. Additionally, companies could try before buy, and hire only stellar employees for full-time positions. The number of temporary workers steadily increased.

The Internet changed how workers find jobs. Websites made it possible for workers with an Internet connected device (computer, smartphone or tablet) to find virtual jobs both in their current city and worldwide.[2] Worker vetting processes, and on-line job review systems, build trust; which allows strangers to connect with increasing frequency.

On-line micro job marketplaces offer a venue for workers, or newly-termed micropreneurs, to grow their business by building up positive reviews and star-ratings. The micropreneur may then launch the business and become a traditional business owner if desired. In the past, workers were forced to rely on classified advertisments or word-of-mouth for jobs which, in real, offered no safety measures and no information in regard to the person posting the job. Additionally there was no way to find temporary jobs on a real-time basis or post that a worker was available that afternoon.

Controversies[edit] Micro job workers are independent contractors and are legally responsible for their actions. The law is murky, however on the relationship between micro job workers and marketplaces where workers find jobs. Lawsuits are expected to test this connection. In January, 2014 the Kuang-Liu family, of San Francisco, Ca.; filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Uber and driver Syed Muzzafar. The accident, which caused the death of their 6-year-old daughter and injured two other family members, was allegedly caused while Muzzafar was fulfilling a driving job from Uber. [3] Individual auto insurance policies do not cover commercial activities, which may result in denials of claims if drivers are working for hire. To prevent legal complications, some ride service providers are requiring their drivers to purchase commercial insurance. Legislation for micro job worker issues remains unclear and unresolved. Advantages[edit] Micro jobs allow people to earn income to pay rent, expenses, or just have fun.[4] Young workers may also use micro jobs as a great first step toward independence. Having a micro job can help with resume building, can build future business relationships, and may evolve into full-time work. Disadvantages[edit]

  • Most jobs don't pay benefits
  • Work may fluctuate
  • Workers can't rely on steady paycheck
  • Finding quality jobs may be difficult
  • Work and life balance challenges
  • Quarterly taxes
  • Solitude

Most micro jobs don’t pay benefits. Also work might fluctuate, which means workers can’t rely on a steady paycheck. Other disadvantage include difficulty in finding quality jobs, managing work and life balance, and the solitude of online work. Indeed, the micro job area is a world can bring stress and pressure. See also[edit] • Samasource • Amazon Mechanical Turk • InnoCentive • Human-based computation • Ubiquitous human computing • Citizen science References[edit] 1. Jump up^ http://workathomemoms.about.com/od/Micro-Jobs-Crowdsourcing/a/What-Is-A-Micro-Job.htm 2. Jump up^ http://www.forbes.com/sites/moneybuilder/2012/07/27/cant-get-a-job-get-a-micro job/ 3. Jump up^ http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/28/us-uber-accident-lawsuit-idUSBREA0R02820140128 4. Jump up^ http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/the-pros-and-cons-of-%E2%80%9Cmicro jobs%E2%80%9D-165853116.html


Best, Kendeyl

Here is the revised page Kendeyl (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Kendeyl: First, be advised that paid editing is highly-discouraged and you or the editors you hire could be banned dependent on the conduct involved. Second, per WP:OWN neither you nor anyone else own any article on Wikipedia. Any edits made here are donations to public domain. If you felt that this article was proprietary work product then it shouldn't have been brought to Wikipedia. The existing article has been nominated for deletion. If it is deleted, the same reasoning for that deletion would likely apply to your draft, too. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems a little complicated: From the history of the article, it seem they did improve the article a little bit, which in practice is the most you can expect from a paid editor. Volunteers usually do better work, and an experienced editor did further improve it; you then seem to have improved it additionally yourself. Though we strongly discourage paid editing, a paid editor can only work under either his regular user name or an invented one for the particular article--it is not physically possible for him to work here under your user name, unless you give him your password, which would be an extremely bad idea (or unless the arrangement was for him to work off line, and send you a version you could then add). I'll give my own opinion at the afd, and I think I shall also look at other work from the apparent editor. DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

00:02:52, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Buuser

[edit]


I based the original submission of this article on a similar article about another BU neuroscientist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hasselmo

This reference had even fewer references than the first version of the article about my mentor, but is published. Why is that?

Buuser (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was published in 2006 when unregistered and new editors were still able to create articles directly in the mainspace. It is therefore possible that it did not undergo any form of substantial review. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 06:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

03:48:01, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Rdellsh

[edit]

Hi, The reviewers said that the references in my article does not prove our notability. Can you please tell me how I can improve it? For example, what kind of websites will be better for our references? Thanks a lot! Rdellsh (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper articles about the company, though preferably not just interviews, would probably be the best type of sources to prove notability. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

06:11:11, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Subash Raj Rajah

[edit]


SR Rqj. 06:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the article was declined as the subject does not seem to be notable enough as a sportsperson. Please see our criteria for the notability of athletes. Aside from these reason, your article needs a longer lead and more information about the subject itself, and you should indicate why you think this person is notable or worthy enough for a Wikipedia article. You might find this useful as a guide. Thanks! Darylgolden(talk) 10:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

06:17:36, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Fa7006164

[edit]


Fa7006164 (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC) why my article was declined ?[reply]

User:Fa7006164/sandbox was rejected for the reasons given in the pink box at the top of that page. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 06:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Referring the contributor to a form notice is not always the clearest or friendliest way of giving help, but the notice is in fact quite specific: the topic of the article Customer satisfaction already exists in WP. Furthermore, your draft is just a one sentence definition, and encyclopedia articles are expected to be substantial. If the subject interests you , why not add material to the existing article? DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10:09:24, 12 June 2014 review of draft by Alistair79

[edit]


I'm not sure why it wont let me save this draft!

Alistair79 (talk) 10:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to having the grey box at the top indicate that your article is not submitted for review, I already fixed that. Darylgolden(talk) 10:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buldana Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Buldana Reg. No 267 (Multistate)

[edit]

10:24:23, 12 June 2014 request for review by Vsdongre

11:57:32, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Vsdongre

[edit]


Respected sir

we buldana urban largest society in Asia. We are here for information purpose, not for marketing purpose. because lots of students are doing studies on our society and they are requesting information from us. and also we wish to have our information on Wikipedia but for general use not for marketing purpose.

so please please guide us for proper way to update our information on Wikipedia.

for more information our website is www.buldanaurban.in

Vsdongre (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Vsdongre (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:05:31, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Balamura

[edit]


This article has been rejected (Pizza Republic India, is an franchise of pizzeria chains that offers a wide range of pizzas, pastas and side dishes from burrito, pita pocket to salads. Pizza Republic operates as standalone restaurants large dine-in restaurants and express kiosks.

Pizza Republic Founded by Ramakrishnan, first Pizza Republic opened in Chennai, India in 2013, they have operations at Chennai, Tirupur, Coimpatore & Jaipur.

http://www.pizzarepublic.in) Balamura (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling us that this article has been rejected. What are your questions about the rejection reasons? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14:23:43, 12 June 2014 review of submission by 64.28.247.169

[edit]

I would like to request information about why my article was denied. I would like access to the review. Thank you. 64.28.247.169 (talk) 14:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello anonymous IP editor! Unfortunately, since you don't have an account, this is the first edit for the IP you are currently on, and you didn't specify what "your article" is (url, pagename, topic), we have no way of knowing where to go to be able to help you understand. You may consider creating an account which will make it so much easier for other editors to help you in the future or reply to this message telling us where your draft is. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 19:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

16:42:47, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Arturo Barajas Saavedra

[edit]

Hi! I recieved a notification that my article submission was declined, and the reviewer encourage me to ask int his forum the reasons why it was declined, so if anybody could tell what went wrong (because this is my very first submission) I'd appreciate that.

Arturo Barajas Saavedra (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Arturo Barajas Saavedra: It was rejected as Original research, something that often happens when one starts to write on Wikipedia at first. This is discouraging when one has put a lot of work into something, but all is not lost. This is precisely what this process is for. The reviewer is experienced and you may want to engage with them on their talk page for specifics. I'm about to go and have a look at the article myself and will leave some comments there. Fiddle Faddle 09:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18:58:41, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Mosiur Rehman

[edit]


I want to create a page in the name "Phoenix Of My Heart" because it will the page of my newly published book. I don't know why it has been declined but I really want to know. Please help me so that I can make that page. Mosiur Rehman 18:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

When your book is a huge success and is widely written about in independent reliable sources, like literary review magazines and such, then someone else will create an article about it on Wikipedia. Until then, Wikipedia does not require an article about your book. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:01:50, 12 June 2014 review of submission by Hans Honk

[edit]


Hello, i wrote an article about Jessica Wilde, a person i know and which approved what i have written in it. Why did you not accept my article Hans Honk (talk) 22:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your answers are at your draft User:Hans Honk/sandbox --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Hans Honk: Put simply, no-one knows who you are or what your motives are. No-one knows whether what you have written is the truth or is defamatory. No-one knowns whether you know the person or not (and we really don;t mind whether you do or not). We cannot publish such material, probably anyway, certainly without full independent references in WP:RS. Wikipedia is not a gossip column. It accepts porn stars and similar folk under well established criteria. This article as t stands is totally unacceptable. Fiddle Faddle 09:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated this submission for speedy deletion as it contains too much questionable and contentious unsourced content. I would remind the submitter that they are writing about somebody's daughter (or perhaps somebody that only exists inside their head). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_June_12&oldid=1135653714"