Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 June 17

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 June 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox_climber (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox_mountaineer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Expert-category-notice

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Expert-category-notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused notice of questionable utility. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from its appearance, it should be a substitution template. It even has the inline HTML comment found in substitution templates. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 06:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, it appears to have been substed some 350 times, but basically not in the past 5 years. There's about 40 uses by someone else but not many of those are since 2019. I find the template similarly questionable in general however. Izno (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Foreign relations of the DPR and LPR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. There is NPASR from an editor in good standing. Primefac (talk) 00:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foreign relations of the Donetsk People's Republic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Foreign relations of the Luhansk People's Republic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The DPR and LPR were puppet states of Russia and had no foreign relations. Aldij (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete They did have recognition from a few other countries, although, looking at Donetsk People's Republic–South Ossetia relations, sourcing doesn't seem to be of the quality you'd want to write good standalone articles that go further than "X officially recognized Y". The navboxes have four and two links respectively, so not great, although there's no objection to recreating them if more articles can be written (hopefully with better sources). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nomination has nothing to do with the templates and is a political statement than of actual concerns with the navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep, nominated by a blocked user and I agree with WikiCleanerMan. x q 00:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep should be the default. Multiple relistings almost always indicate keep. It's not clear that there will be long term value for these templates, but at the moment they should remain. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 11:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Diplomatic missions of Bosnia and Herzegovina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 June 27. Primefac (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Diplomatic_missions_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Transperth railway network diagram

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 June 29. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Transperth_railway_network_diagram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Warren Railroad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Template is now used. There is NPASR if a different rationale is given. Primefac (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Warren Railroad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: has been restored to parent article. Useddenim (talk) 02:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:West-Midlands-Metro-Line-One

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 June 27. Primefac (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:West-Midlands-Metro-Line-One (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zhengzhou–Jinan high-speed railway RDT

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Template is now used. There is NPASR if a different rationale is given. Primefac (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zhengzhou–Jinan high-speed railway RDT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: has been restored to parent article. Useddenim (talk) 02:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Railway signal mast

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 June 27. Primefac (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Railway_signal_mast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Virudunagar–Sengottai line

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. There is NPASR if different rationale is provided. Primefac (talk) 00:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Virudunagar–Sengottai line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route map. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: has been added to an appropriate article. Useddenim (talk) 03:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Useddenim. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 11:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arvind Kejirwal series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arvind Kejirwal series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate sidebar template and misspelled version of Template:Arvind Kejriwal series. DB1729^talk 13:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The content does differ a little between the two. I suppose the solution is to merge the content under the correct spelling. --DB1729^talk 13:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged the material to the properly titled template and I've replaced all usage and it can be safely deleted. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rally Isle of Man

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rally Isle of Man (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with two blue links in the body. DB1729^talk 12:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.