Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 July 18

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Those About to Die (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enought articles here to justify a navbox. Even the original work, the book is just a direct as of now. The articles in the related section are way too broad. ★Trekker (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox atom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox atom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:TFD#REASONS #1, as it is only used in a single article, atom. Moreover, this is a static template that forks {{infobox}}; it would be more convenient for editors to just have this be an instance of infobox in the article. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Makes sense. Odd to have a separate page for one article's infobox. Mrfoogles (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The basic infobox is supposed to be a meta template but Infobox_atom is not that long anyways Mrfoogles (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The basic infobox documentation says it can be used in an article in precisely these kinds of situations. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kurzon (talk) 07:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Formula One drivers from China

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Formula One drivers from China (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless template, as there has only ever been 1 Chinese F1 driver. So this template doesn't actually do any navigation, which is the purpose of templates Joseph2302 (talk) 18:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Doesn't cost anyone anything, and there will eventually be another Chinese Formula 1 driver. Easier to just keep it for consistency, and so that it doesn't have to be remade when there finally is another one. Mrfoogles (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is pure speculation, no evidence it will ever actually be a valid template. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pointless clutter as it offers no navigation. A navigation template should have a few links (editors typically point to 5) for it to be valid, so even if there will be one more driver this still should not be remade. Gonnym (talk) 13:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sandbox graphical timeline

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sandbox graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused timeline. Previously deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Strymon–Kulata railway

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Strymon–Kulata railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Duplicates Template:Strymon–Kulata railway diagram. Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. D.S. Lioness (talk) 00:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sealdah Rajdhani Express

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sealdah Rajdhani Express (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Content added to Template:Sealdah Rajdhani Express Route. Gonnym (talk) 15:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mandurah railway line map

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mandurah railway line map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Duplicates Template:Mandurah Line. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The inclusion of all the bridges and tunnels is not necessary. Template:Mandurah Line is better as it is less cluttered. Steelkamp (talk) 15:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:London Buses route SL8

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:London Buses route SL8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Partially duplicates Template:London bus corridor SL8. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It only partially duplicates the bus corridor (which should be renamed anyways), and it is for a specific route on the SL8 page. 92.20.253.61 (talk) 17:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. {{London bus corridor SL8}} has been modified to show only the section relevant to the page it's transcluded onto. Useddenim (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:London Buses route 207

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:London Buses route 207 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Partially duplicates Template:London bus corridor SL8. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It only partially duplicates the bus corridor (which should be renamed anyways), and it is for a specific route on the 207 page. Also, it does not run the full length of the corridor, which may cause confusion. 92.20.253.61 (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. {{London bus corridor SL8}} has been modified to show only the section relevant to the page it's transcluded onto. Useddenim (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Joondalup railway line map

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joondalup railway line map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Duplicates Template:Joondalup Line. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The inclusion of all the bridges and tunnels is not necessary. Template:Joondalup Line is better as it is less cluttered. Steelkamp (talk) 15:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Verification requested

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 July 29. (non-admin closure) Toadette^Edit! 15:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Verification_requested (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2024ILDem/sandbox

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Toadette^Edit! 15:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2024ILDem/sandbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not needed and is not even really being used to experiment with anything. This should just go to the relevant page about the Illinois Democratic primary. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We generally keep sandboxes, even if they are unused. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sandboxes for a template like this are not necessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jonesey. Izno (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.