Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< October 17 October 19 >

October 18

[edit]

Template:NS Intercity lines

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 21:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arriva Stoptrein stations

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Arriva Netherlands Frietjes (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bgr

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded in just one (mainspace) article page and three user subpages. Must be substituted. George Ho (talk) 17:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Big Time Rush

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Big Time Rush (group). ✗plicit 14:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Big Time Rush with Template:Big Time Rush (group).
The band and the show are intrinsically linked, sort of like The Monkees. Merging them into the same template simply makes sense. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support, generally neutral about merging these templates. The only major thing that Template:Big Time Rush (group) has, but not Template:Big Time Rush, is tours, though most but one have promoted music from the series, so maybe it could be possible to include them in the combined template. The group's current work, not related to the show anymore, didn't get enough notability to have articles as of now, with the exception of the Forever Tour (which doesn't promote any specific soundtrack from the series), but this article is currently on shaky grounds due to its issues.
    Danionek (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022–23 Premier League table

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus, since this discussion, is to include the league table within the seasonal article, not as a separate template. Spike 'em (talk) 09:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and previous TfD precendence here Spike 'em (talk) 11:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep You see, if we look at this issue with this opinion and idea, we should completely abandon all templates. Like the teams squad template like Template:FC Barcelona squad. So why do they exist? Should we remove all of this and create it separately for each player's article on a team? These templates exist for this purpose and are created so that once they are created, they can be used with a short text in other articles, instead of adding a long text above in the external links section of the players' articles. At the same time, the existence of these tempkates makes us get rid of editing conflicts, because sometimes such cases are difficult to correct, and it is not possible to remove wrong edits with one click, because there is an editing conflict, and it cannot be reversed, because standard editing and Well, after this editing conflict, if it is reverted, it will violate the rules of reverting. To solve these problems, the existence of such templates is strategic and helpful and it is easy and convenient to solve their problems. THANK U ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ (Talk) 10:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But this table is maintained in one place only and its code is not duplicated anywhere else. It can be (and is) transcluded into other pages. The squad list templates you refer to are irrelevant to this discussion. Previous TfD discussions have endorsed this approach. Spike 'em (talk) 12:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, with respect, this is wrong and these two are related and both are used in exactly the same way. What is the reason for someone who is in article "A" and reads the content to be referred to another article, article "B" to see the league table? ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ (Talk) 13:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another reason is the update. Perhaps (relatively speaking) the Nottingham Forest team article has less support than Manchester City in terms of updating. If I want to be more clear, for example, the table in the ManCity article is updated up to week 10, but for Nottingham Forest up to week 5, and maybe the table has problems and errors, for example, the goal difference recorded in the ManCity article for Nottingham Forest is +5, while in the article Nottingham Forest +3. I mean to be accurate and correct if there is a single template for the table related to a season; This work is easy and accurate and does not cause any problems. THANK U ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ (Talk) 13:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sod respect: you don't appear to know what you are talking about. The Premier League table is already successfully transcluded from the main article into all the team seasonal articles. The current Nottingham Forest season article has {{:2022–23 Premier League|showteam=NFO}} , which displays as
Pos Team
 Pld W D L GF GA GD Pts Qualification or relegation
14 West Ham United 38 11 7 20 42 55 −13 40 Qualification to Europa League group stage[a]
15 Bournemouth 38 11 6 21 37 71 −34 39
16 Nottingham Forest 38 9 11 18 38 68 −30 38
17 Everton 38 8 12 18 34 57 −23 36
18 Leicester City (R) 38 9 7 22 51 68 −17 34 Relegation to EFL Championship
Source: Premier League
Rules for classification: 1) Points; 2) Goal difference; 3) Goals scored; 4) If the champions, relegated teams or qualified teams for UEFA competitions cannot be determined by rules 1 to 3, rules 4.1 to 4.3 are applied – 4.1) Points gained in head-to-head record between such teams; 4.2) Away goals scored in head-to-head record between such teams; 4.3) Play-offs[1]
(R) Relegated
Notes:
  1. ^ West Ham United qualified for the Europa League group stage by winning the 2022–23 UEFA Europa Conference League.
.
There is no need for a separate template and there is existing consensus not to use one. Spike 'em (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Premier League Handbook 2022/23" (PDF). Premier League. pp. 109–111. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 August 2022. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
delete, selected transclusion works well here per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete Not super thrilled with treating article like templates in the way the current consensus does, but engaging in a one-person rebellion against the standard is not the answer. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Academica Clinceni squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The club was dissolved in the summer of 2022, so no need for a squad template. I propose to be deleted. Rhinen (talk) 07:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Page2AfC

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Apparently created as a proposed template during this discussion, and then abandoned shortly thereafter. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Warner Bros. Themed Entertainment

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this navbox. It appears that {{Warner Bros. Movie World}} is more comprehensive and preferred to this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spider-barnstar

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, documentation, or incoming links. Appears to be a test from November 2021 that never got off the ground. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sanctions log header

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never-used (search one, search two) template related to a failed proposal from 2009. Delete, or move without a redirect to a subpage of that proposal page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User access levels navbox

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, or documentation. Appears to have been replaced by the more comprehensive {{Wikipedia accounts}}. Also, despite the name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Repechage-8Round1

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{2NTeam-NTeamBracket}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 02:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Project part

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or categories. Created in 2009. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bar chart year

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or categories. Created in 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedialang (word count)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contains no template code, and wildly out of date. No documentation or categories. Subst into the two talk pages where it is used, then delete it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yousaid

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in one User talk archive. Created in 2007, does not appear to have been adopted. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:36, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cat use mdy dates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Proposed in a 2011 discussion, but does not appear to have been adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_18&oldid=1118214936"