Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 7

< March 6	March 8 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Colombia riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig (talk) 23:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Current riders for a defunct team. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Team Virtu Cycling riders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Team Virtu Cycling riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Current riders for a defunct team. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Équipe Paule Ka riders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Équipe Paule Ka riders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Current riders for a defunct team. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mate Bulić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — The Earwig (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mate Bulić (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigational template for Mate Bulić; no longer serves a purpose now that the listed albums have been turned into redirects and the 'related articles' listed have no use for this template. Lennart97 (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ambiguous episcopal titles and sees in England

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ambiguous episcopal titles and sees in England (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is certainly a good-faith creation, but it is most unusual to have a navigation box for dabs, per MOS:DAB#Images and templates. I'll notify WikiProject Disambiguation. Certes (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems an utterly useless navbox to me. Why would someone looking for the Bishop of Shrewsbury, and finding that it's ambiguous, then want to navigate to Bishop of Portsmouth because that's ambiguous too? Obviously we don't have an article on the subject: Ambiguous episcopal titles and sees in England, so fails WP:NAVBOX #4. Nigej (talk) 11:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is no connection between the targetted dab pages, so it is difficult to imagine anyone wanting to navigate between them (except a Wikipedia editor wanting to compare how they had been capitalised or similar). Unnecessary clutter. A list article of Ambiguous episcopal titles and sees in England might possibly be of interest to someone, but not a navbox. PamD 12:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extended periodic table (by Pyykkö, 50 columns, periods 8–9)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extended periodic table (by Pyykkö, 50 columns, periods 8–9) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Extended periodic table (by Fricke, 52 columns, periods 8–9) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used, as instances in Extended periodic table have been replaced by images. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LaundryPizza03: Appears the first is still used in Pekka Pyykkö? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 03:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, I have merged the remaining use with Pekka Pyykkö with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hardcoded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hardcoded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:T3 no longer exists as a criteria and this is unused. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LibyaUsers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LibyaUsers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No reason to have this be a template; no uses; same list exists at Wikipedia:WikiProject Libya/participants. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unnecessary duplication of information already on the wikiproject subpage, and unlikely to be used anywhere else. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Content now in Wikipedia:WikiProject Libya/participants so no problem with deletion. Nigej (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lht

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 19. Primefac (talk) 13:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lht (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Life:)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Life:) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navigation template; redundant to Template:Turkcell Group. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Life:) was an earlier name for lifecell now owned by Turkcell. Nigej (talk) 09:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lightning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Note that Template:Meetupsig/intro is used over 1700 times so would need further discussion before deleting. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lightning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one Wikipedia-meetup page from 2017 - hasn't found widespread use. Suggest to subst and delete for historical reasons. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. {{Lightning/sign}} is related and can go too and probably {{Meetup/signup/editintro}} I suspect. Nigej (talk) 09:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:M class minelayer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:M class minelayer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navigation template where the main article and all the sub-articles redlink. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Navbox with no navigation: WP:Write the article first Nigej (talk) 08:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox unhexquadium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox unhexquadium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox for an element (164) that's so far from what's known (118) that it's not particularly likely it'll become notable anytime soon, not to mention that all the data is hence quite speculative. Double sharp (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly, unhexquadium is not an article (and when it is, this infobox could be refunded). Elli (talk | contribs) 04:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We are very restricive with speculative elements. -DePiep (talk) 11:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unfinished infobox for an element that has yet to be discovered. Prospects of notability are reasonable, as evidenced by detailed predictions of its chemistry and stability, but no article exists yet. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom (speculation and no corresponding article), but recreate if and when an article is written about this element. ComplexRational (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I note that there are no other templates for systematic names above 128. YBG (talk) 01:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Leng Tch'e

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Leng Tch'e (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation template for band no longer serves a purpose as all listed albums redirect to the band itself. Lennart97 (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundant. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete navbox with no navigational use. Nigej (talk) 09:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).