Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 24 March 26 >

March 25

[edit]

Template:The Nadas

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template for band The Nadas. The listed albums are not individually notable and redirect to the band article, meaning the template no longer serves a purpose. Lennart97 (talk) 20:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R from historic name

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:R from former name. Izno (talk) 01:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:R from historic name with Template:R from former name.
The categories for former names and historic names were merged a few months ago. The previous TfD outcome indicated that if the categories were merged, there would be no prejudice against merging the templates as well; it's the logical follow-on step. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the reasoning I gave last time; the distinction between "historic" and "former" is arbitrary at best and superfluous at worst. It's best to just tag relevant "historic" names as printworthy. No amount of documentation or distinguished use is really going to solve these problems. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Earthquakes in 1812

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Merge as suggested. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are way too many of these navboxes, with many having too few entries to warrant a navbox. I recommend condensing into navboxes by decade and century. Only going up to 1959 because after that we cover enough earthquakes for a navbox system to be useful, although some lists in this era are missing. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We can easily combine the list of earthquakes with the template for earthquake articles this way. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the quantity and the fact these are all used, I am relisting and will be adding the appropriate tags shortly. LaundryPizza03, please take better care of that in the future.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Str gtr str

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, very limited in functionality compared to what a Lua version would do. User:GKFXtalk 15:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. That implementation is terrifying, as is all string manipulation in wikitext. Izno (talk) 15:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Triple soft redirect

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template has no actual usage, other than in Template:Triple soft redirect/test. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Video games by country

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep after removing the redundancy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated by content in {{History of video games}} (note: I foolishly added this template to about twenty pages before realizing this). Elli (talk | contribs) 19:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 15:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_25&oldid=1018951328"