Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 19

< September 18	September 20 >

September 19

Template:Team Secret

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No oppose (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Team Secret (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only has a single linked entry. Fails its sole purpose as a helpful navbox. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RankedMedalTable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Deprecate old template (non-admin closure) Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medals table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:RankedMedalTable (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:RankedMedalRow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:RankedMedalFooter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose deprecating Template:RankedMedalTable, Template:RankedMedalRow & Template:RankedMedalFooter in favor of Template:Medals table.
I have just completed {{Medals table}} which accomplishes what {{RankedMedalTable}}, {{RankedMedalRow}} and {{RankedMedalFooter}} do but in one template. Rank is automatically calculated as are the totals for each nation. I guarantee that there is room for improvement with {{Medals table}} and welcome any and all feedback. My proposal is to deprecate the use of these three templates in favor of using the new one. I don't think this is technically a case for merging, but want to get the discussion started. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: Per nom. – BrandonXLF ^(t@lk) 22:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree --Hddty. (talk) 06:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support deprecation of the three previous templates and continued improvement of the new template/module as the 7,000+ articles that use it are migrated and edge cases are found. I think it was premature to place deprecation notices on the three existing templates while this discussion is in progress, unless I missed a discussion somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Jonesey95: good point, I should have waited to deprecate. Got a little excited. I've reverted the deprecation until this discussion closes. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Having one standardized template would benefit all.--Darwinek (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question is it possible to have rowscopes in Template:Medals table as your recent edit to 1924 Winter Olympics medal table seems to have removed them, despite the requirement per MOS:ACCESS? Harrias ^talk 09:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Harrias, should be fixed now (added here). Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, thanks Frietjes that looks great. Bearing that in mind, this seems a sensible proposal. Harrias ^talk 17:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brisbane Metroads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brisbane Metroads (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Road infrastructure in Brisbane. This was always rather redundant anyway but now this template has been fully integrated into that one. No other Australian capital city has an equivalent template - hence why I merged them. No transclusions. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 13:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redundant. Frietjes (talk) 13:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yanson Group of Bus Companies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 1. Primefac (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yanson_Group_of_Bus_Companies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rotherham Titans squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rotherham Titans squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a navbox containing players in a rugby union squad. However, none of the players have an article, all the links are red links. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 04:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Navboxes are for navigation between articles but there are none, apart from the main which can list the names and already does.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 08:10, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 Olympic Athletics Schedule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 1. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2016_Olympic_Athletics_Schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2016_European_Athletics_Championships_Schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2014_European_Athletics_Championships_Schedule (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 639

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 28. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISO_639 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 639 code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 28. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISO_639_code (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).