Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 249

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 245←Archive 247Archive 248Archive 249Archive 250Archive 251→Archive 255

Martin Gernát

Back in 2012 his article was PRODed and rightfully deleted by user Fastily who is no longer an admin, and after contacting was directed here. Gernát now fulfills WP:NHOCKEY by playing in the Czech Extraliga (criteria #1). -18abruce (talk) 03:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Dazza20006

It is just a made up page for me to edit thats all it's not on the main site so other people cant see it please dont delete it i have spent lots of time on it -Dazza20006 (talk) 07:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Anyone who knows where the userpage is - and it is generally linked in one's signature - can see it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Userspace is not a place to put a biography of yours, please use other websites for that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Hardgrave

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) DavidCM70 (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@DavicCM70: Seems like you have restored the draft. Do you need the previous history? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
@DavidCM70: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

luiza prado

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -95.90.237.50 (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

not appear advertising. I looks like a page made for an artist, however would delete the second part for lack of reference

Assuming you mean Luiza Prado: The page is not deleted or even tagged for deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Journal of Contemporary medical sciences

?i didn't know how to create article and how to referenced to an article.please undeleted this page and i edit it perfectly -Cg9825 (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done We don't restore copyright violations, especially not these which read like spam. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

? this page is not copyright violations is medical journal page and is for my boss -Cg9825 (talk) 14:40, 23

It is a copyright violation, of this page. CC-BY-NC 3.0 is not an acceptable license for material copied over here. Also, what is your relationship with User:Sajad1993? We don't do sock puppetry here, especially when evading a block. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ardor Marketing

I, Jblawg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jblawg (talk) 02:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

@Jblawg: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Ardor Marketing. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 09:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Penington Institute

I, 103.253.92.96, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.253.92.96 (talk) 03:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Aniket Jadhav

Aniket is one of the rising football superstar of India. I am a huge fan of him. If you google: Aniket Jadhav Football Player, you will find several news on him. So this is my request to refund the page. He really deserves it. Thanks. -59.88.147.91 (talk) 04:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aniket Jadhav, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
There was a very strong consensus for deletion. I suggest waiting until he plays more, that should fix the notability issues. --Tone 09:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


CybrHome

CybrHome is one of the rising product company in India, the product is also popular in few European countries and US. It is the best tech product from NITK Surathkal after Practo. It helps people explore the internet/websites just like Pinterest helps people explore images. The product has no ads. It is also one of the few govt funded private organization in India. I am an avid CybrHome user and crowd-sourcing contributor on their platform and also a huge fan of their team and commitment. I had met them once personally during one event. The page was very well written with references and as far as I remember I had also made some edits, not sure. But there was no promotional content and was constantly being edited by various people for improvements. However, someone recently deleted the page completely without any notice or discussion. So, I request you to please read that page and restore it. If you want changes let me know and I can edit it before restoring but I believe people should really know about CybrHome. Thanks. DRGHMD (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Grachan Moncur II

Contesting PROD. Moncur was a noteworthy jazz bassist; I do not know what the state of the previous article was, but Moncur appears in standard reference works. -Chubbles (talk) 14:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:StarLeaf

I, Abesharp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abesharp (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


I started a draft page about video communications company StarLeaf, the draft was deleted automatically after 6 months of inactivity but I have new notability evidence and want to start working on the page again. Thanks! -Abesharp (talk) 23:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Doncaster St. James F.C.

This club was notable after all! -Kivo (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

luiza prado

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -95.90.237.50 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC) There appears advertising. To delete the second part for lack of references, not the full article.

199ride

It was not written for advertising purposes and is a large company in Wisconsin, the number one independent used car dealer actually. The companies advertising is gaining a following and organic imitation. -98.103.182.50 (talk) 14:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bgwhite (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. It was written like an advertisement, all about how great their service is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

AULARI

It tells where the AULARI name comes from and it's informative -Lp guertin (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lp guertin: It was also in French, and this is the English-speaking Wikipedia. Please write in English when you are here, fr:AULARI is the place for writing a French-language article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Devil Summoner - Soul Hackers Coverart.png

Should be used again as an infobox image of Shin Megami Tensei: Devil Summoner: Soul Hackers. I will put the Nintendo 3DS cover art into body article if the other is undeleted. Also, must use the Star Ocean (video game) as precedent. -George Ho (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Wait, Graeme. The Sega Saturn cover art must be one of previous revisions; it should be recovered. --George Ho (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 Done I have undeleted all versions, which one do you want to use? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
I selected the image with black background and "Sega Saturn" gold sidebar on the left. --George Ho (talk) 07:59, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 Done other images hidden. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Krfoundation/sandbox/Kenneth Rainin Foundation

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Krfoundation (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


Krfoundation/sandbox/Kenneth Rainin Foundation Please restore.

I suggest you read WP:Username policy#Promotional names and go to WP:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid being blocked. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Let me note I have now tagged this as G11 and G12 (from its own website) and, Graeme Bartlett, it should not have been restored. SwisterTwister talk 22:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
The G11 was excusable, but G12 is not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
So deleted again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Zama Arman

Please Undelete Zama Arman Page because this is the first article of Nadiagul2424 -2A03:2880:3010:CFF4:FACE:B00C:0:8000 (talk) 09:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hyatt Regency Mumbai

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Anchal17 (talk) 05:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Lightshow (rapper)

The reason why this article should be undeleted is because the article does reference credible articles of his music career accomplishments. -Saonmedia (talk) 11:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightshow (rapper), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Lightshow (rapper)

I, Saonmedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saonmedia (talk) 11:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also please note, that if "Saonmedia" is a company, you must change your user name to something that represents you as a person. Not a company. See Wikipedia:Changing username. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Lancom Systems GmbH

The article was removed because of no "sources existing" and "even German news media searches are not finding anything". But the company exists and Google news search finds more then 100 articles, among them articles in German newspapers FAZ (one of teh five leading German daily newspapers, funkschau, IT BUSINESS and others. Hier is an articles in faz.net, which is the online version of FAZ: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/beruf-chance/sicherheit-im-internet-12879140.html.Here is another article in Handelsblatt, which is the leading German business daily newspaper on LANCOM, when they got the award „Technology Fast 50“-Award: http://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/beruf-und-buero/buero-special/technology-fast-50-award-2015-mit-diesen-50-unternehmen-muessen-sie-rechnen/12518104.html -Mikausch (talk) 12:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Mikausch: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lancom Systems GmbH, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The second source is too trivial/uninformative to add much to notability. I dunno about the first. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

senorita india

The page of this beauty pageant was deleted because it was not considered noteworthy enough. There are multiple news articles related to this pageant, and it has one of the BIG 4 pageant franchises, i.e. Miss International. Other pageants of lower noteworthiness such as Rubaru Miss India Elite has their pages. Some of the news links are:

  1. http://www.easternmirrornagaland.com/rewati-chetri-crowned-senorita-miss-international-india-2016/
  2. http://www.voiceofgreaterassam.com/rewati-chetri-wins-senorita-india-2016-title-will-represent-india-in-miss-international-2016-pageant-in-tokyo/
  3. http://www.easternmirrornagaland.com/miss-international-india-2016-rewati-chetri-appointed-visit-japan-ambassador/
  4. http://daily.bhaskar.com/news/TOP-beauty-queens-from-north-east-5423431-PHO.html -49.204.110.200 (talk) 15:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senorita India, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RegentsPark (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Bonnevilla

Per the admin that deleted the page @Ixfd64:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ixfd64 the page was deleted because the proposed deletion was unopposed, I was a victim of vandalism/harassment by an IP user, the one that proposed the deletion, he demanded more references but every time I would try to edit the page he would undo my edits, and started insulting me using profanity, the article had been reviewed and edited several times by different editors and admins, it needed a couple of more references, but the edition itself was clean, I would like the opportunity to continue working on the page and if possible investigate the IP user for miscondut , thank you very muchHerrkhor (talk) -Herrkhor (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

@Herrkhor: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. The article may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a discussion lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. If it is to be kept, you need much better references. Youtube, Facebook,and your own sites, do not count towards WP:Notability, and adding multiple references to them does not help at all. Clicking on some of the other links did not show me references to the band. For instance, putting "Bonnevilla" in the search box of your first reference, HipHopNation, produced "No hay resultados", and clicking on your PartyUtahAlbum and UndergroundHipHopBLOG references did not show any mention of Bonnevilla, either.
What is needed is references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The link you provide should go straight to a page where Bonnevilla are being discussed in some depth. See WP:Notability (summary) for an explanation of what is needed, and WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much for the opportunity @JohnCD:, I'll start working to improve the article this next days, regarding the previous IP User that kept attacking the page is there something I can do to prevent him from harassing me again? Thank you again!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herrkhor (talk • contribs)

Provision (musical group)

User: Explicit Deleted my page stating that their concern was: No evidence of notability. Provision is my band, and this was my page. We are one of the most notable Synthpop Bands in the World, and we have been since 2000'. I am a monetary contributor to Wikipedia and I donate through PayPal throughout the year to Wikipedia. I don't believe that the User: Explicit was justified in Deleting my page. -Breye7x (talk) 22:16, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. User: Explicit was merely following the procedure at WP:Prod. There is a problem with writing about things close to you, in that you can be distressed by what others do to it. Also the article can come out quite biased and written in the wrong style. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Charles Edward Parker

I see that this article was deleted some time ago. I have found several sources that indicate the importance of Parker and his architectural work. He was a prolific designer, and several of his works, including the Chicopee City Hall and the Evangelical Baptist Church and United Parish of Auburndale, both in Newton, have been placed on the National Register of Historic Places for architectural significance. As it was deleted under sd criteria A7, I request that it be userfied, as I believe that I can add valuable information to the subject. -JPRiley (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Sady Doyle

The article on Sady Doyle was deleted in August 2016 with little or no debate, and the few words of discussion inaccurately assessed the subject's body of work. The delete discussion didn't accurately describe the volume of her writing, such as in the Guardian[1], but only noted her writing in the Atlantic[2]. Since the deletion, she also published a book[3] which has been reviewed in notable outlets[4][5]. Further, she was mentioned in the leaked Podesta emails as someone of importance to the Clinton campaign's messaging[6], and has been cited as a "prominent feminist."[7] -Grisamentum (talk) 21:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sady Doyle, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RoySmith (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. You could write a draft at Draft:Sady Doyle for consideration. References will need to have more than a two or three word statement about the subject to be counted as substantial though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree with Graeme Bartlett. The AfD was quite close to unanimous, so while I don't want to officially dissuade you from starting a deletion review, such a review would be unlikely to go anywhere. My advice to you would be to read WP:JOURNALIST to get a better idea of what we're looking for, and also WP:RS and WP:N for what kinds of sources we need. Then, write a new article, as suggested, at Draft:Sady Doyle. I can't promise it'll be accepted, but as long as you find good sources, there's no reason the AfD result can't change. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
  • I apologize because I'm new at this, but I'm still not clear on why this Undeletion process is inappropriate. WP:UND claims that this process is, among other things, for pages that were deleted after "deletion debates with little or no participation." Here, the nominator was echoed by three participants with no elaboration or further participation. There were two substantive participants, but both of them somehow missed the majority of the subject's work at The Guardian. I don't see how this rises above the level of "little participation." In any case, I suppose I could write a draft of a new article but I frankly don't have time. In any case, thanks for your attention.Grisamentum (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
  1. ^ https://www.theguardian.com/profile/sady-doyle/
  2. ^ http://www.theatlantic.com/author/sady-doyle/
  3. ^ https://www.amazon.com/Trainwreck-Women-Love-Hate-Mock-ebook/dp/B01CBLP27Q
  4. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/25/books/review/trainwreck-sady-doyle.html
  5. ^ http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/09/how-pop-culture-tells-women-to-shut-up/502187/
  6. ^ http://nypost.com/2016/10/21/clinton-campaign-coordinated-with-liberal-bloggers-on-sanders-attacks/
  7. ^ http://www.vox.com/2016/7/28/12300078/hillary-clinton-woman-president-democratic-nomination-feminists

Domenick Lazzara

BLP's should be given time to fix rather than speedy deleation under a proposed delation program as there was a variable source ; -BrianRFSU 22:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC) Summary deletion is appropriate when the page contains unsourced negative material or is written non-neutrally, and when this [b]cannot readily be rewritten or restored to an earlier version of an acceptable standard[/b].BrianRFSU 22:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianRFSU (talk • contribs)

Graeme Bartlett Simply want to note this Draft was in fact yet another copyvio by the user themselves. SwisterTwister talk 02:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:PlayerVB1

This template was deleted under T3, but it is not unused and does not appear to be a duplicate of anything. Deletion of this and other templates left red links in a few dozen articles. -– Jonesey95 (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC) The complete list of templates to restore is:

I do not think that any of these met the criteria for T3. I posted a note on the talk page of the deleting admin, RHaworth, with this request, but there has been no restore yet. Osplace may also be involved somehow. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Osplace, can you help here? I do not see a reference to another template or to a related discussion when I follow that link. I searched for the word "template" on that talk page and could not find a related discussion. I will post a request for help at the project's talk page.
The criteria for WP:T3 say "Templates that are substantial duplications of another template, or hardcoded instances of another template", but without knowing what the recommended other template was, it is not possible to reconstruct the articles and templates that used the deleted templates. I suggest that the templates should be restored, and then the original nominator should take them to TfD with a recommendation to subst or convert them to a replacement template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
When you follow the link, you fill find our "Previous club squads" discussion. This is the way we have been presenting the squads for volleyball international tournaments and club competitions. Mmhuang (talk · contribs) found that the basketball rosters they use and made a copy for volleyball, as a result, that user created all those templates. Since the first goal of WP Volleyball is Standardize the appearance and layout of volleyball related articles we asked him to join our discussion, but that user just made fun of us and never replied in our discussion. After several notes in his talk page, we proceed to T3, because all those templates together pretended to do the same we have been doing way simpler and consistently. He implemented that template, but we were only aware in time for the 2016 FIVB Volleyball Women's Club World Championship squads, but Dongmin1994 (talk · contribs) change it to the agreed uniform one. With all those red links we should roll back the affected articles. We tried to warn Mmhuang when he had only edited two articles, but he soon spread the template to all the Filipino volleyball articles without ever replying a single message in our discussion. Please do not restore anything. Thank you. --Osplace 17:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment left inside the Filipino-only changed rosters: Using system used by the PBA: flag = country of birth place. this is the system used to classify filipino foreigners. If we'd go to the principle of they are all Filipinos, let's just remove the flag column. PBA stands for Philippine Basketball Association. Take note all the affected articles were only edited and included with that template by the same user. --Osplace 17:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
So it sounds like you are proposing to visit every article and template listed in Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:PlayerVB1, for example, and roll back each of those articles and templates to a version that does not use a deleted template. If so, that works for me, and let me know if you need help. I suggest that if there is a next time, those reverts should be done before the deletion of the templates so that we don't break live versions of Wikipedia articles that now look like this. I sympathize with your situation of having an editor who will not participate in a good-faith discussion, but our obligation to our readers is to deliver them articles that are reasonable in appearance. Thanks for coming here to respond. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Yes, that is my proposal and yes I am willing to help editing every article that need attention. --Osplace 03:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Great. I recommend starting with Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:PlayerVB1 and fixing the templates in that list. Fixing the templates will fix most or all of the articles, which you should be able to WP:PURGE to remove red links. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Finished working and this is the final outcome:

Restored articles:

Articles that not roster could be rescued:

Templates that were nominated for speedy deletion under DB-G8:

Articles that were PROD:

Open for more comments. Thanks, --Osplace 05:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Wonderland Villas

Probably notable -SSTflyer 11:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Map Grid of Australia 1994

Page was deleted because it was more than 6 months since I added to it -AnthonyDunk (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

@AnthonyDunk: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" JohnCD (talk) 17:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xavier_West

I was advised by User Talk:Explicit that my page was deleted by another editor though the details are not visible and secondly the request had remained uncontested for seven days, which resulted in deletion. I wasn't aware. He has said that since it was deleted through a process which is considered 'uncontroversial', I'm allowed to simply request the page to be restored -XavierWest111 (talk) 09:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

@XavierWest111: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Duffbeerforme (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please understand that you are strongly advised against editing your own page (see WP:Autobiography), but are welcome to make suggestions on the article talk page if there are inaccuracies that should be corrected. JohnCD (talk) 17:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Sajid Ishaq

Dear Concern, I have created page Sajid Ishaq who is very well known personality, you may google him, I have many reference links but I am new on Wiki so I have no idea how to verify the information, Please help in this regard and do not delete the page -115.186.129.71 (talk) 05:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Although this was actually deleted at AfD, you are not actually showing us why, how and where you would improve it if restored, therefore there's not a lot to show for the meaningful improvements this would need. Let me note that we would need actual in-depth third-party news, and no press releases, interviews or trivial passing mentions. You are also not stating how the nomination's comments of "advertising: "He is playing an essential role in creating...", "He holds strong reputation in", "his experience and expertise in the field" etc" which also affects the article overall. SwisterTwister talk 18:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
@Zeeshansamikhan: the AfD close was explicitly WP:SOFTDELETE, allowing for restoration on request. A subsequent speedy deletion included WP:CSD#A7 no credible indication of significance or importance, and if restored to the mainspace it might well be speedy-deleted again for that reason. So I have restored it to Draft:Sajid Ishaq where you can work on it. What is required to establish Wikipedia:Notability is references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Your first reference gives a two-line quote from him; the second has one line announcing an appointment as assistant and, as far as I can see, no other text. Neither of those is significant coverage. See WP:Notability (summary) for more explanation of what that means. JohnCD (talk) 22:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Peter Khalife

I, Peterkhalife29, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have time to edit the page and its important since Peter Khalife achieved new things and he needs to update it on his page -Peterkhalife29 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

@Peterkhalife29: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Please understand that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves - see Wikipedia:Autobiography. If an article is accepted, it will not be your page, it will be Wikipedia's page about you. Note also that you must not copy text from external sources, that you require references to reliable published sources to verify what you say, and that you should preserve a neutral and factual tone and avoid "puffery" like "known for his speed and very high fighting spirit." JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Penington Institute (2nd request)

The page was deleted before it was approved. There is new information that will be submitted for approval. -103.253.92.96 (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done The article wasn't deleted because it lacked material. It was deleted because (1) it was an advertisement, with grandiose unsubstantiated unsourced phrases like "grown out of the rich and vibrant work" and (2) it copied material directly from another website. Not only that, it was created again after deletion with the same exact issues (and just deleted again). If it is created once again in that state, it will be protected from ever being re-created. I suggest you start over from scratch, without copying text from other sources, and without the promotional language. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:PlayerVB1 (2)

Because I think it is fair to use this template for future volleyball pages. -08251985 22:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Not really, since that template contains no useful content, it's just a blank template.
 Not done, duplicate request of above ongoing discussion. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Stowarzyszenie Harcerstwa Katolickiego-Zawisza.svg

article now exists at Stowarzyszenie Harcerstwa Katolickiego Zawisza -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Luke de paul/sandbox3

Just trying my editing skills, I didn't know that I was being watched -

The World of Mykola Lysenko

It appears that one of the references I used when creating this page was a 'copyright infringement' I will modify it to comply to Wiki policies as soon as I am able to access the content of the page. Please restore this page. Thank you! -Theptf (talk) 13:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

@Theptf: it's not that the reference was a copyvio, but the text of the article was copied from the source. I can't check that, because the source website is currently a deadlink, but we cannot restore copyright violations. Instead, I have emailed you a copy of the text. Please check out WP:Copying text from other sources and WP:Close paraphrasing, and rewrite it in your own words. JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

craig hollywood

Article was deleted under a PROD which I was not aware of and object to. I was notified of the deletion by someone who was able to get in touch with me that was looking up the information. The page was rated a B grade and already past the various tests years ago. I do not understand why someone flagged it now for deletion when it has already passed the appropriate tests to be included in this volume of valuable data. -C. Williams (talk) 15:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

@Njcraig: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 18:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


Collins Archie-Pearce

Article submitted for Collins Archie-Pearce to be reviewed by Wikipedia administrator for publishing, but was declined and nominated for deletion by Coren stating that the article appears to include material copied directly from a website address http//archiepearceproduction.com. That website is my website and I own the copyright to the previously published contents. I ask for a review of my article which has been revamped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellengyampoh100 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

@Ellengyampoh100:  Not done. On the talk page of the deleted article, user Collinsp19 (talk · contribs) wrote "Archie-Pearce Production Ltd is my website and I am the sole owner of the website". Are you the same person as Collinsp19? If so, please choose one account and use only that one, to avoid suspicion of "sockpuppetry".
Copyright material cannot be used simply on the basis that someone on the end of a wire says that they are the owner. It is necessary for the actual copyright owner to make a formal copyright release, as described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials.
In any case, simply copying someone's own promotional material does not make a satisfactory encyclopedia article. That website is Mr Pearce telling the world about himself, but writing about oneself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. Please read Wikipedia:Autobiography.
A Wikipedia article requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". That is for two reasons: to establish that the subject meets Wikipedia's inclusion test, called Wikipedia:Notability, and to provide sources from which an article can be written which is an outside view, not just the subject's story about himself.
It is clear that you either are Mr Archie-Pearce or are closely associated with him. That gives you a WP:Conflict of interest which means that you should not edit about him directly. I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Your first article and then use WP:Articles for creation to make a draft for review by an uninvolved user. If you want to use material from his website, you will need to make a copyright release, but it may well be better to write in your own words, avoiding promotional language: no opinions, just plain facts about what he has achieved, cited to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 19:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

RSLBP

I wat to add my organization's page here and it has the real existence and authorization. That's why I want my page undeleted -RSLBP (talk) 19:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

@RSLBP:  Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory or a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. JohnCD (talk) 19:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Moshe Menasheof

Added many links confirming most of the facts written in the article, including the writer's credentials in the National Library of Israel and other sources -Lilachk (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

  • This page is not deleted, so it does not need to be restored. Do you want an WP:AFC review? We can insert it for review. But expect it to be declined. At this point in time you will need at least one more independent reference to show notability. You have the Eli Eshed reference which is good, but all the others are connected to the subject, (or are exhaustive lists like the library that don't prove notability). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
My intention was if someone could move it back from draft to the article section. I added a few more articles from sources not connected to the subject (and I can add more). Is that enough? Lilachk (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
I added it for AFC review. In a few weeks someone will take a look at it, hopefully someone that can read the Hebrew references, to see if they are reliable, and not just quotes of the book cover. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Yacht Ragtime

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -104.33.67.228 (talk) 09:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

The racing sail boat RAGTIME has previously been listed on Wikipedia. Recently the page has been delated. As owner of this vessel from 1973 -1981 I can confirm that the previous description was correct. I have recently prepared to add to wikipedia page and find that the page no longer exists. Yacht Ragtime was built in New Zealand and came to United states about 1970. the boat was considered radical at the time because it was a 62 foot light displacement boat. Ragtime was the First to finish winner in the 2225 mile Transpac Yacht Race in 1973 and 1975. Ragtime raced out of Long Beach California in the 1970's Numerous pictures of Ragtme with sail race number 7960 can be found on Google Photos.

I respectfully request that YACHT RAGTIME be undeleted and placed back on Wikipedia. William White Co Owner Ragtime 1973-1981.

  • Hi William. We cannot restore this because it was a copyright infringement. However I have written a new page for you at Ragtime (yacht). If you can write about the physical characteristics using some reliable sources, but without copying word for word that would be good. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph Willie

No reasoning given. -Lostboy347 (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)|2= Just received more credible information on the individual to add for referencing. He's just been signed to Fear Front Publishing and will be a published author before Christmas.

Not done. It looks like this article would be a WP:BLP violation if restored. Unsourced content about living people is not allowed. The deleting admin User:Spinningspark noted "This may be an attack piece." If reliable sources about this man (such as a book) are eventually published, you should reapply then. EdJohnston (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Danielle Berrin

The subject of the article was listed for speedy deletion, and deleted while I was in the middle of adding sources. The subject is relatively notable since her article is being discussed in all the main Israeli newspapers, including by Israeli parliamentarians, a former leader of the opposition, and by the owner of Haaretz, Israel's oldest newspaper. The former leader of the opposition says her article has opened a new national debate. Thanks! -Avaya1 (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Avaya1 At best, I will note there's still not enough for fully convincing actual notability, so please still add all additional in-depth third-party news sources overall, but please no interviews, trivial passing mentions or other triviality. As for the award, that one will not convince notability since it's simply a local state award. SwisterTwister talk 23:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 Already done by Anthony Appleyard. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Hagan Capital Group

I, Gelander, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gelander (talk) 10:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_249&oldid=1138664251"