Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 205

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 200←Archive 203Archive 204Archive 205Archive 206Archive 207→Archive 210

Draft:Ishtiyaque Alam Shahbazi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mdnaseemk (talk) 16:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Lecroitg/sandbox

I, Lecroitg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lecroitg (talk) 14:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Biblical Graduate School of Theology

It was a work in progress and part of stub/collection of related pages of Christianity/churches in Singapore -Bpc.sg (talk) 09:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoverHound

The administrator deleted the article because "the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability. (companies)" I'm including links to four articles, there are many others, that prove that CoverHound has the notability that Wikipedia requires of companies who have Wiki pages.

Anwiley (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC) -Anwiley (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

@Anwiley: : Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Piotrus (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 19:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

JohnCD We are happy to make the necessary updates and edits to the page. Are you able to assist us in the process or can you recommend another editor who can help? Anwiley (talk) 23:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Anwiley: I will reply on your talk page later today. JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Tow Siang Hwa

It was a work in progress and part of stub/collection of related pages of Christianity/churches in Singapore -Bpc.sg (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

See reply re Calvary Pandan Bible-Presbyterian Church, two below this one. JohnCD (talk) 11:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Rodleen Getsic

This page has been up for many years with several contributors and reference links. The reason given for deletion was that Rodleen is only known for her film, but she has done other films and her career also is in the music industry. She has sang as a featured vocalist with famous bands, including receiving a platinum record. She has also done notable political work with communities in disaster response. Who ever deleted her article did not realize the depth of her work, and that she has countless fans all over the world. Please restore her article. Thank you. -WikiGurrrL (talk) 23:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Article was deleted and redirected to The Bunny Game per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodleen Getsic (2nd nomination). --Finngall talk 00:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Can you please email me the article as it was before it was deleted? WikiGurrrL —Preceding undated comment added 05:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you WikiGurrrL —Preceding undated comment added 16:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Audio Standard forum

I, Martinwtaylor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MartinT (talk) 12:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Corrected article link Hasteur (talk) 16:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Not done This was a copyright violation of here and here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Rodleen Getsic (2)

I want more info on Rodleen than what has been left on her wiki -98.232.90.112 (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done, already restored to Draft:Rodleen Getsic by Tokyogirl79. If you want more information, do some research and expand the content. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

User:LL221W

My user page. -LL221W (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

 Done, @LL221W: restored with revision history. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Viralbrothers

I'm looking for background information on the viral brothers youtube group -129.62.68.248 (talk) 04:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done There is no such article to undelete. Please bear in mind that Wikipedia does not carry articles about groups which do not meet Wikipedia's "notability" guidelines. Most YouTube groups, including many that have "gone viral," do not meet this requirement and they will not have an article here. Note: I am not an admin, so I couldn't un-delete the page even if it did exist and was eligible for un-deletion-upon-request. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Actually, there was an article ViralBrothers, but I am not restoring it because it seems more like a hoax - there were only three lines of text, and they were copied (including the birth date and the Youtube handle) from the article Markiplier. So it wouldn't tell you anything about the Viral Brothers. The references were one to Youtube (which we do not consider a reliable source) and one deadlink. Davidwr is right that Youtube personalities are unlikely to meet the notability standard; Markiplier is an exception, and you can see that his article has four or five non-Youtube references about him. JohnCD (talk) 07:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Mc keezy k (2)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Lenyoradoe (talk) 08:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

We found new references about this article,Im willing to edit it.

 Not done - see reply just above. JohnCD (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Mc Keezy k (3)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Skholopo (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and add more references,due to the user:Brianalaflair lacked information about this article,then tried to violate it by creating another With the similar name Mc keezy k(Producer)

 Not done - see reply two above this. You will not gain anything by making more accounts and repeating this request. JohnCD (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kirsty McKenzie

I, 95.150.52.238, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I wanted to come back and work on it, have more sources - magazines, publications and press that I want to add to it to source and cite references properly -Thirstyk420 (talk) 09:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@Thirstyk420: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dorkinian Football Club

I, 81.105.164.4, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 81.105.164.4 (talk) 13:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. (a user did try to improve the page after last restore) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Mc keezy k

This is a source about an artist who a lot admins been trying to help him to be on wiki,so his fans can easly google him. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mothoko (talk • contribs) 08:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

You're going to need to be more specific. There was Mc Keezy k(Producer) but that was deleted under WP:G5 because it was created by User:Brianalaflair in violation of User:Brianalaflair's ban. You should probably consider creating a new article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 Not done There was Mc keezy k, created three times and salted (protected against creation), and Mc Keezy k created twice and salted, with a lot of sockpuppetry but no indication that he meets the notability requirements of WP:MUSICBIO. You can ask the deleting administrator, NawlinWiki, whether he is willing to "userfy" a copy of the article for you to work on; if not, you can apply at WP:Deletion review.
First, read WP:MUSICBIO carefully, because unless you have references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" an article will not be accepted. Wikipedia is not here to help people be easy to Google. JohnCD (talk) 08:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: this requester and those of the two items below have been blocked as checkuser-confirmed sockpuppets. JohnCD (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA)

I, Lamb70, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lamb70 (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@Lamb70: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

DNS Made Easy

I have improved the page, deleted all external links and made it not look an advertisement. Please remove from deletion and help improving on it.. Thank you -Xandios (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Specifically, you may comment at WP:Articles for deletion/DNS Made Easy. —C.Fred (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/miss universe favorites list 2009

I, 178.135.233.235, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 178.135.233.235 (talk) 19:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" You will need to add context and explain why this is a different page to Miss Universe 2009, and references are needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joan T. Schmelz

I would like to make the necessary edits so this page will be approved for publication on Wikipedia. -NeeshaRS (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Manika (singer)

Please restore Talk:Manika (singer) after I have restored Manika (singer) to mainspace. -Cunard (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Jayanta Bej

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jayanta_Bej 07:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done and will not be done From what I can see, you were trying to post a personal profile on to Wikipedia. This is not what Wikipedia is for, as it is not a social media site. I've also deleted your userpage because you seem to be doing this on your userpage as well. I am going to give you one warning to stop this or you will run the risk of getting blocked for trying to use Wikipedia as a social media site or Linkedin. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Audio Standard forum

I, Martinwtaylor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MartinT (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


Please would you honour my request to reinstate this draft page so that I may edit and resubmit it for approval?

I am martinwtaylor and am the forum owner MartinT at the forum http://theaudiostandard.net There can be no copyright violation since the wording pointed to are my words.

Wrong. If it has been published anywhere else absent a release under a compatible copyleft licence, then it's a copyright violation (per the Berne Convention, all works are fully copyrighted upon creation unless explicitly stated otherwise; Wikipedia is licenced under CC-By-SA 3.0 Unported and GFDL). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Technically, it isn't a copyright violation if the copyright holder is using the words in a draft article. However, because we do not require any confirmation of real identity to become an editor, we cannot allow copied material to remain in Wikipedia without some evidence that it is properly licensed.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
That said, I took a quick glance at the deleted article and it is not close to being appropriate in its present form so there's no value in restoring it. Were we to restore it you would have to file a permission statement which would then have to be processed by OTRS and then someone would request a deletion of the article at AFD which would almost certainly prevail. Let's not waste everybody's time.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
So the encyclopedia of everything doesn't want an article about a new forum that has made tremendous impact in the small world of high end audio since its inception a year ago? All I see are blocks being placed in my attempt to get an article submitted, but no help. I'm done here.--MartinT 09:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Because this is an encyclopedia a different style of writing is needed. Recycling text from a website does not result in suitable writing for an encyclopedia. So it would be best to rewrite from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DJ Dirty Harry.

Complete editing and then click the "Save page" button below -Happier People (talk) 10:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

@Happier People: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:DJ Dirty Harry. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Ian Chilvers

The page was created for me by somebody, it was factually correct so I'm unaware as to why it has been removed? can it be reinstated -Ianchilvers (talk) 11:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

@Ianchilvers: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Wgolf (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute.
Welcome to Wikipedia. I will add some advice to your user talk page within an hour or two. JohnCD (talk) 11:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Kώστας Μπίκας

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nikos5214 (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC) 1.Κώστας Μπίκας 2.is name of basketball athlete of ΑΟΝΣ ΜΙΛΩΝ refered as of best players in wikipedia for this team i wrote some few for beggining of page to be better in future and was deleted as not encyclopedial even if the name is mentioned with red in team page of wikipedia..the person that deleated the page was WRONG ...you can see the team page with refer to Κωστας Μπικας name https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9C%CE%AF%CE%BB%CF%89%CE%BD_%CE%9D%CE%AD%CE%B1%CF%82_%CE%A3%CE%BC%CF%8D%CF%81%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82_%28%CE%BA%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%B1%CE%B8%CE%BF%CF%83%CF%86%CE%B1%CE%AF%CF%81%CE%B9%CF%83%CE%B7_%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B4%CF%81%CF%8E%CE%BD%29

@Nikos5214: this is the English-language Wikipedia. No article with that name has been deleted here. If it was on the Greek Wikipedia, you will have to ask about it there. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
It was on the Greek Wikipedia. Click on el:Κώστας_Μπίκας; that will show you who deleted it and why. JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Paris bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics

IOC has announced the name of the candidate cities for the Games of the XXXIII Olympiad on September 16 and Paris is among the five candidates. -109.219.130.33 (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Simon Dinnerstein

I respectfully wish to request that the images removed from this article be reinstated.

Fair use permissions were filled out for each image. If In those permissions I used the rationale term "For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work." please allow me to explain why I chose that option.

While the article is entitled "Simon Dinnerstein", the express purpose of it is to explain the artist's personal background and the style and influence of his art. The images presented were used to illustrate techniques discussed in the article (magical realism, the use of light, etc.) and to show the various media he uses in his work (pencil, charcoal, paint, etc). Since readers wanting information about Dinnerstein are more likely to seek him under his name, rather than under individual articles about each of his paintings, I believe this information should be contained under one article. With that in mind, I chose the above fair use rationale. The article is specifically a discussion of the man and his work. Therefore, I believe the fair use rationale appropriate.

As I stated in the Wikipedia permissions, the photos and art were provided by Simon Dinnerstein himself to be used in this article for educational purposes. Therefore, I do not see a conflict in their use.

I kindly request that you reinstate the images. Thank you for thoughtful reconsideration of this matter.Jupiter3000 (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment The FFD for all images in question are at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2015_March_21#Simon_Dinnerstein. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
(e/c) @Jupiter3000: Not done. As stated at the top of this project page, it is explicitly not for requesting undeletion of anything deleted after a deletion discussion–thus reversing another administrator's close. It is only for uncontroversial undeletions. Accordingly, the files deleted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 March 21#Simon Dinnerstein will not be undeleted here. I will say parenthetically that fair use could never sustain such hosting of multiple images in the author's article. Possibly one, with a proper rationale filled out, as noted in the close by Peripitus, if actually discussed in the text to meet contextual significance. The author's permission for use here while retaining non-free copyright ownership does not have any affect one way or the other on the need to validly meet fair use – every one of the ten criteria. If the author wanted to, he could release one of his artworks to the world, irrevocably and permanently, under a compatible free copyright license or into the public domain (see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials) and that would make its use completely unproblematic, but it is understandably not something many artists would want to do.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
In accordance with the closing admin's comments, I am willing to consider undeletion of one carefully chosen image if a proper rationale can be given. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Budapest bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics

IOC has announced the name of the candidate cities for the Games of the XXXIII Olympiad on September 16 and Budapest is among the five candidates. -Hektor (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budapest bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File:100th_Army_Band_KY_State_Senate.jpg

OTRS ticket received. Thanks. -Storkk (talk) 13:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

@Storkk: See my note in the OTRS ticket. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Amatulić, I'm sorry: I wasn't clear and should have been less terse. As I cannot see the file, it would be helpful to have it provisionally restored with {{OTRS received}}. But you are right, I should probably have replied to the ticket as the first step. Storkk (talk) 09:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
@Storkk: OK, I restored it and tagged it with OTRS received. I notice you replied to the ticket. We'll wait and see what transpires. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
@Amatulic: thanks. I have corrected the license and will nominate it for deletion in a week if no response has been received. Storkk (talk) 07:38, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Smith's_Cloud_-_2008_-_Bill_Saxton,_NRAO,_AUI,_NSF.jpg

I'm requesting undeletion of the bigger version of this image, as NRAO images are now CC-BY-SA 3.0 and this image was uploaded while non-free. -189.25.241.15 (talk) 03:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done, nothing to do. There are no higher-resolution images in the deleted history of that file, in fact there is no deleted history. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
@Amatulic: I think 189.25.241.15 is referring to the version of 02:08, 20 March 2012, which was hidden by Nthep on 14:42, 2 September 2015 with the log-comment "content hidden (Orphaned non-free file(s) deleted per F5)". davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 05:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Nisha Yadav

There is regional media or regional language coverage of Nisha Yadav which has been ignored by the admins while deleting -203.115.71.6 (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisha Yadav, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I would agree with MBisanz's assessment of the consensus. If you think that there are references then you could start a draft. Draft:Nisha Yadav. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Altdrive

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Joanou (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The page for AltDrive should not have been deleted in the first place. A google search for "AltDrive" has many authoritative hits including reviews and news releases. The business have been operating since 2005.

Some references are: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Joanou (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.sos.wa.gov/corps/search_results.aspx?search_type=simple&criteria=all&name_type=contains&name=altdrive&ubi=
  2. ^ http://www.backupreview.com/altdrive/
  3. ^ http://www.cloudwards.net/review/altdrive/
  4. ^ http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/06/prweb11953822.htm
  5. ^ http://altdrive.com

@Joanou: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AltDrive, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Chillum (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 20:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Kimberly "Kim" Perry

i would like to reestablish this page to insert an updated article on this individual. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kp4kids (talk • contribs) 19:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Signal strength in proton NMR

I, Carolineneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carolineneil (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Templating Methods – Use of Metals in Supramolecular Assembly

I, Carolineneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carolineneil (talk) 18:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hydrogen Bond-Assisted Supramolecular Assembly

I, Carolineneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carolineneil (talk) 18:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Substrate Control: Addition of Achiral allylmetals to α-Chiral Aldehydes

I, Carolineneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carolineneil (talk) 18:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Carbanionic Synthons

I, Carolineneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carolineneil (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Signal Strength in Proton NMR

I, Carolineneil, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carolineneil (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/johannes stroux

I, Ixicon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ixicon (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Asociación Scouts de Colombia.svg

not my image, superior to the image that removed it -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

You're right, both are pretty bad, though. I'll do what I can with the new one. Please redelete, thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Martin H.M. SCHREIBER

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Marie-Christine GALLICHER (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I have argued with Martin H.M. SCHREIBER for personal reasons as I know him personaly and decided to delete the article in anger yesterday.

I know that the article itself was in pending deletion for a lack of sources : I have had attached several links (his website, New York Daily's article, 3 interviews, a link to Getty Images and another article on Internet.)

I would like the article to be brought back because as a photographer, Martin H.M. SCHREIBER has his place beneath the Wikipedia encyclopedia and I have abused of my power of creating this page because of something that has nothing to do with his professional qualities.

I thank you.

Marie-Christine GALLICHER (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:ASIA Consumer Community

I processed an OTRS ticket regarding this page (see talk page). Please have a look to see if it can be restored. Permission comes from the domain where the text came from. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:The People's Foundation

I processed an OTRS ticket regarding this page (see talk page). Please have a look to see if it can be restored. Permission comes from the domain where the text came from. -Jcb (talk) 21:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Frankmalcolmkembery/sandbox/Frank Malcolm Kembery

I, Frankmalcolmkembery, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. frankmalcolmkembery 22:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done This is a partial copyright violation from this page. Even if you wrote the original material, Wikipedia cannot accept material taken from elsewhere. You can file a ticket through WP:OTRS, however a look at the content shows that you would still have to re-write it for clarity and to remove the promotional tones from the article. This can sometimes be difficult to do when you have a conflict of interest, so you may want to ask for help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Music. You also need to provide sources to show that you would pass WP:MUSICIAN. This can be done with reviews and articles about you that would be considered a reliable source that is independent of yourself or anyone/anything that is directly involved with you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

The Next Internet Millionaire

Please move The Next Internet Millionaire to Draft:The Next Internet Millionaire. See the discussion here. -Cunard (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lightrains Technolabs Pvt Ltd

(talk) 06:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Calvary Pandan Bible-Presbyterian Church

It was a work in progress and part of stub/collection of related pages of Christianity/churches in Singapore -Bpc.sg (talk) 09:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

yes please restore to draft. thanks! Bpc.sg (talk) 14:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Bob Kerstein

Microsoft used to have a project named "Bob", at the time of it's discontinuation a man named Bob Kerstein owned Windows2000.com which Microsoft needed, and traded the Bob.com domain for the Windows2000.com domain. -Me171 (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC) [1]

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob
Question@Graeme Bartlett: can you please look at the AFD version does the article differ from that version enough to not qualify for G4? If it does differ, we can let the second AFD continue.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Some was similar, but now I have added some references and rewritten parts. It looks as if permission was granted for the "copying" so I guess it was written by the subject. To me it looks less promotional now, the old version had the phone number to contact for example. From the number of references on line I think the topic is notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Tom Hingston

Have been ill and unable to continue with the page, would now like to finish it -SnowyJo (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phil Soto

I, Bbossoxx, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bbossoxx (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alfred Ronald Heaver

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cameroncowan (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Ella Health

I, JenniferWinthrop, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JenniferWinthrop (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Lexogen GmbH

I, 91.115.55.207, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 91.115.55.207 (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

OIKOS Software, Inc.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JaniceLeahy (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC) Hi - Our business was part of the many pages deleted under the Wikipedia information team [info-orangemoody@wikipedia.org] mass deletion in August 2015 . We were scammed by a person who claimed to be a Wikipedia Editor.

We would like to know if we could get a copy of the deleted page, and who we could communicate with to help get a page back up.

Kind regards, JaniceLeahy (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)J Leahy JaniceLeahy (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

A copy of the deleted page is doable, but we will require multiple third-party sources that aren't associated with you and aren't just passing mentions or business listings, and for it to be written in a neutral manner in order to have an article. We do not appreciate the (ab)use of Wikipedia for its Alexa ranking and search engine preference. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Janice, the Orangemoody trouble was bad for everyone. The mainspace article at OIKOS Software will not be restored. But I have restored the original draft created by User:Anjo227. This is Draft:OIKOS Software. It is not ready yet, as it will need rewriting to eliminate promotion, and use of reliable independent references. In your position it will be hard to write in a neutral tone. However you probably know the magazine and newspaper appearances of information about the company, and you could add that to the draft. Asking volunteers for help is unlikely to find anyone, as there is just too much to write about. If not enough independent people have written on the topic, then notability cannot be proven. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

pebble hills university

All the sources of the page can be found in www.pebblehills.edu and then click the "Save page" button below -61.244.102.164 (talk) 01:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

While this is a PROD and thus restorable on request, I will note that we need sources that have no direct or indirect connection to Pebble Hills University. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Please be aware that diploma mills are likely to wind up at WP:AFD. Read this before attempting to create a page about this organization and be prepared to show that the agency what accredits the school is itself a reputable accreditation agency ("accreditation" given by so-called "accreditation agencies" that give their stamp of approval to diploma mills do not count). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Update STRONGLY recommend against attempting to re-create this article UNLESS it is to describe it as what it is - a non-accredited institution which has attracted the attention of government authorities in at least two countries.[1] davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. @Davidwr: do you want to fix this up? It already says unaccredited. I did not restore earlier versions that said it was accredited, by a presumed accreditation mill called IAO. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Please note, I have started an AFD for this article at WP:Articles for deletion/Pebble Hills University. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
  • A post-script and a warning to others wishing to undelete similarly non-notable aticles: The AFD closed as "delete and redirect to List of unaccredited institutions of higher education". This turned out to be an unintended (?) "mercy killing" as the article had morphed into a page that largely showed the institution for what it really was (I say "largely" because there was still a bit of promotional material yet to be edited out). As a result of the un-deletion, editing, and re-deletion, sites that archive deleted Wikipedia articles now show a more accurate page than the promotional page they previously showed. Let this be a lesson to those wishing to undelete promotional material: be careful what you wish for, you may get it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paradism

I, Raelianjarel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Raelianjarel (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Not doneThis is pretty unambiguously promotional, enough to where I'm not really comfortable restoring it since it was essentially a manifesto for the system. I do not have a problem with sending you a copy of the article via e-mail, but it will have to be substantially re-written before you resubmit this to AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_205&oldid=1138663992"