User talk:Anwiley

Welcome!

Hello, Anwiley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Wikipedia doesn't want to become a "list of everything" or business listing directory. The test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of saying so but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about?

That has the advantage of being a more objective test than "Do we think it's important?" and also of ensuring that there are independent sources for the article. It is quite a tough test, and many worthy organizations, especially new ones, cannot pass it. That is not at all to their discredit, but it means they are not suitable subjects for a global encyclopedia.

What you can do now

Possible deletion of the article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoverHound. You are welcome to join in that discussion, but first read WP:DISCUSSAFD and the notability guidelines linked above. The discussion will run, normally, for seven days, after which an uninvolved administrator will decide what to do, based not on a count of heads but on the arguments advanced in terms of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (A keep or delete opinion there is described as a "!vote", meaning "not-a-vote".)

The main issue will be what counts as a "significant" reference. The article has a lot, and I have not looked at them all, but some of them seem to be either based on press releases or entries in lists of startups which look like the company's description of itself rather than substantial independent comment about it.

If you are connected with the company, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You are still entitled to comment at the deletion discussion, but you should disclose your interest.

For advice on developing the article, I recommend the WP:Teahouse.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]