Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 139

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 135←Archive 137Archive 138Archive 139Archive 140Archive 141→Archive 145

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Imran Qureshi

I, Janelizlynch, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Janelizlynch (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 15:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Ruben Smith

Requesting to have early deleted edits restored into edit history. -Dolovis (talk) 21:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done @Dolovis: There was a single deleted revision left from 2008. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Ian Umney

The article was deleted for the reason it is about an individual etc. The page has not yet been finished and will refer to Umney's Last Case amongst others. The article will explore the strange surname and its origins including the coat of arms, worldwide coverage and so on. There are many references to be made to the surname such as John Paul College, Kalgoorlie, Umney English, Dnepropretrovsk and the French Foreign Legion. Please allow the page to be finished before deleting anything. -UmneyIan (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I oppose undeletion. The biography was about a 28-year-old with no notability. There is no need to engage in original research about the surname using this non-notable person as the springboard. If UmneyIan wants to tell the world about the surname, he should start the article Umney (surname). Of course, such an article should be built using WP:Reliable sources. Binksternet (talk) 19:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 cannot be undeleted by request. You can ask the deleting admin, or take the case to WP:DRV if the admin declines to consider your request. Bear in mind, however, that you should not write about yourself on Wikipedia anyway.
Ideally, main article space should not be used for working drafts about people. Use your sandbox or a sub-page in your user space to get the article into shape before publishing it to main article space — especially if you're writing about yourself, you should use Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Then you need not worry about someone coming along and deleting the article, as will happen in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/c.khid

(I'm fixing this for IP 66.87.104.251.) -Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Neurotree

The reason for deletion was no indication of significance. But Neurotree is referred to in numerous Wikipedia pages as well as having a PLoS ONE article about it (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0046608). Neurotree is significant. -Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC) Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hitansh Kataria

To improvise the article and then click the "Save page" button below -Hitanshk (talk) 04:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hand-in-Scan

I have just created the page yesterday, and now I want to adapt a full content to it -Kovacsodonka (talk) 11:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Erra (band)

There is no reason that this page was deleted, but it was using A7 argument falsely. This is hurting the relevance of this whole encyclopedia by those incongruities. I should not even have to explain myself in the first place. No logical argument can be use against the irrational. -NotyetaMentat (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Johnelwaq/sandbox undelete

Requested deletion after the completion of projection however I would like to reaccess the material as it is useful. -Johnelwaq (talk)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Kevin.grimes/GUNAM Scale

I, Kevin.grimes, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kevin (talk) 16:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Springs Transit (Colorado Springs)

I, ImTheEqualizer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ImTheEqualizer (talk) 05:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Ruaan Van Den Burg

I believe this page to be legitimate -Flynn Fraser (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Not done and will not be done This was deleted under WP:G3, as a blatant hoax. You will have to provide some pretty solid proof in order to show that this person actually exists. Given the claims in the article, it'd have to be something in an extremely, extremely reliable source for us to even begin thinking about restoring the article. As it is, the article is full of unsubstantiated claims and some of them could be seen as personal attacks against the person in the title, so re-creating this without providing an overwhelming surplus of sources can lead to you getting permanently blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:12, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Australian Grammy Award winners

Sideshowwgt (talk) 07:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it a soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Silverpeas

Silverpeas has showed indication of notability -Ebonnet38 (talk) 09:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Phyllis Harmon

Editing -96.58.120.177 (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Check out WP:Your first article, WP:Verifiability and the WP:General notability guideline. JohnCD (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

ESafely

I would like to have the content back so that I can work on it and improve it so that it is worthy of being a Wikipedia article -08:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Secretsources (talk)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Secretsources/ESafely. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natural Retreats

I, 31.221.98.178, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 31.221.98.178 (talk) 12:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Qormi Hockey Club

The page was deleted because an admin said that some text was copied from a website. That is true however I was the admin of the website in question and now it is no longer online as I have started a new website. "Save page" button below -46.11.75.27 (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

That isn't how copyright works. Per the Berne Convention it's automatically copyrighted at moment of publication. That said, it was deleted in 2007 as a G12; the other deletion was an expired PROD in 2009. Your best bet is to hope that there's something worth restoring under the PROD.—Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Not done. The PRODded version is sufficiently similar to the content of the latest archived version of the website https://web.archive.org/web/20091025221153/http://geocities.com/qormihc/history.html that it qualifies as a copyright violation.
I suggest you start again from scratch, but this time use Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Uneven Tower in Torun

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -5.184.2.79 (talk) 18:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Antoine Roussel

Please restore edit history for this re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Living Medicine

wish to edit for resubmission and then click the "Save page" button below -JellyFish567 (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done I'm declining this for a few reasons. The first is that the article was written in a fairly promotional, essay-like manner that comes off as promoting living medicine. It'd have to be almost completely re-written to fit a neutral point of view. The second is that I have to echo the concerns that there's not enough justification to show that this specific aspect of holistic medicine merits a separate page in and of itself. I'd recommend starting a discussion at Talk:Holistic health about possibly making a small subsection about this or making a mention somewhere on the page, but for the most part I can't entirely see where this is so independently notable that it would really pass AfC at this point in time. That concern (which seems to be the predominant concern of everyone that declined the page) paired with the way the article was written, makes me think that if you did want to try at AfC again, it'd just be best to write a new article entirely. I still think that making a subsection would be the way to go, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Laragh, County Monaghan

I, Thlint, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thlint (talk • contribs) 22:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: - the original request was actually blank before it was deleted - Alison ❤ 00:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done There's nothing to restore, as the entry was completely blank and contained no writing or sources. On a side note, there's nothing to stop you from creating a new AfC article under that entry name, if you so wish. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Matthew Martin

I, 2602:304:10D5:77E9:1006:68EC:1C71:AF35, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:304:10D5:77E9:1006:68EC:1C71:AF35 (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dubist12 (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Not done Not only was the article very, very promotional, but it's also partial copyvio from the official website. I'm sorry, but this will not be restored. I'm not against you creating a new AfC candidate, but it will need to be neutrally written and in your own words. Even if the company gives up the content as fair use, the promotional tones would still require that the article be completely re-written to fit our guidelines for neutrality. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

St. Josephs Church (Dayton, Ohio)

I would like this page restored because I feel the administrator LIED that it was about a company. It is about a church, and is ONLY about a church. There is ABSOLUTELY no copyright in it. Sorry for the capital words. I am just so frustrated because I feel that the administrator does not want me on this site. Again, it is about a church, and ONLY is about a church. -DLindsley (talk) 18:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. A7 is not a copyright-related deletion (it's a failure to assert notability), and churches are "organizations" in the truest sense of the word. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Although on the topic of copyright issues, the page reads a little like it was taken from an official pamphlet for the church. The tone is fairly casual and would need some serious editing to be more neutral and encyclopedic. It's not promotional necessarily but an overly casual tone can make things seem a little more positive in how it's written. The church is quite old, so it would be worth looking to see if the building is a registered historical landmark. If I remember correctly, being a registered historical landmark and listed at the National Register of Historic Places is enough to pass notability guidelines, although you will have to be able to prove this via a RS. On a side note, I'm not sure that WP:A7 really covers buildings as the article was mostly about the church building itself more than the congregation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done A little searching and I found that it's copyvio from the official website, as both direct copyvio and very, very close paraphrasing. I'm not against a re-creation via the mainspace or WP:AfC, as long as it's re-written in your own words. Even if the church gives up the content as fair use, it'd still essentially need to be re-written in order to remove the casual tone. I think that the historical landmark angle is the right way to go, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Canada - Official Anthem (Instrumental).ogg

It never seems to matter how much effort one puts into attributing source and copyright terms. Trigger happy Wikipedians just blindly enforce rules without reading. Again, I'll reiterate the copyright terms Her Majesty bestowed upon this recording. " "O Canada" and "God Save The Queen" are in the public domain and may be used without having to obtain permission from the Government.". Scroll to the bottom, it's there. -Bananas21ca (talk) 02:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

This is a bit of a fiddly one - whilst the music and lyrics of most National Anthems (including this one) are indeed public domain, a performance may create a new copyright, and it's not unambiguously clear from the source that this particular recording complies with CC-BY-SA. I would suggest, instead, uploading the version from nationalanthems.info, which is specifically licenced under CC-BY-SA. Yunshui 雲水 08:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stephen Bennett, The Portrait Painter

Theportraitpainter (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲水 08:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/USS OCELOT IX 110

(talk) 15:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Jeral Tidwell

I am the artist and have a lot of request for a Wiki page. I have been a professional artist for over 26 years, published in over 60 magazines, published 8 art books, shown my work in 19 countries, won the world body painting festival ( first American to do so ), and have created posters and album covers for most of the largest name is music. I just wanted to start the page and get all of the info organized and upload it in an organized way. If it is a matter of me not understanding your format, I will review it and work on that. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Jeral — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.134.247.117 (talk) 02:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC) -

  • I'm sorry, but you would have to pass WP:ARTIST in order to merit a page. The best way to go about this would be to provide sources that are in independent and reliable places, such as a review of your work. We do not keep pages based on the popularity of the artist. Popularity can help make it more likely that sources exist, but it is not a guarantee of coverage in and of itself. As far as awards and shows go, you would have to show how these were notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. Not all awards are considered to be notable enough to give notability per Wikipedia's guidelines and not all shows are considered to be overwhelmingly notable to qualify on that alone. Also, just publishing isn't enough- you have to show that getting in the publications is notable. It's become easier and easier for people and companies to print things, so the rules for what would be usable has become increasingly more strict. It all boils down to coverage. Along with these concerns, I'd also like to warn you about editing with a conflict of interest (WP:COI). Editing with a conflict of interest doesn't mean that you can't edit, just that it's way, way more likely that you will write something in a way that would be potentially seen as promotional or overly positive, and that you may see more notability than there might actually be per Wikipedia's guidelines. There's also the possibility that you will take things more personally, as there's a very real and obvious benefit to having a Wikipedia article about oneself in the average situation. I want to stress that all of this is per Wikipedia's guidelines- on a personal level many of us are frustrated that we can't be more inclusive, but there has to be a cutoff at some point. I'd recommend that if you are interested in making an article, that you try going through WP:AfC as opposed to making something in the mainspace. I would also heavily recommend that you look into getting help from the WP:TEAHOUSE and one of the applicable WikiProjects such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Arts. They can help you discern what is or isn't usable and can help deal with some of the issues that frequently arise with COI editors. I'm not trying to say that you shouldn't have an article, just that this has to be gone about in a specific and careful way. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, since you have a conflict of interest, you need to be using Wikipedia:Articles for creation to create articles about yourself, and once published in main article space, you should not make changes to it. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Aaaaarg

I'd like to have time to make any changes requested. If this is not possible, I'll start a talk page on the Aaaaarg and see if this hehps. Thanks for your help. -MrChristian - Beyond the stars (talk) 18:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

No, it won't help. Please don't create orphan talk pages that don't have articles. It's only three sentences -- start it over in your sandbox or use Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bearian (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lyndsey Parker

[[User talk:67.72.118.219 18:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stack Melter

I, Seen a Mike, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Seen a Mike (talk) 16:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Answer the question above first. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
See above. Seen a Mike (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Craig Domres

Want to work on page -Seen a Mike (talk) 16:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Why are you not using your original account User:Seen a Tina? ~Amatulić (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
I did not log-in to Wikipedia for a few months and was unable to log back in with that account. I don't know if I had the wrong password or what. When I tried to have the password reset, I did not get an email. I don't recall if I had confirmed an email address associated with "Seen a Tina" or not. Seen a Mike (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
As an article this would be speedy deleted with no claim of importance. Before any restoration of the page can you please state here why this topic is important in one sentence? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Living medicine

I, JellyFish567, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JellyFish567 (talk) 23:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm declining this for a few reasons. The first is that the article was written in a fairly promotional, essay-like manner that comes off as promoting living medicine. It'd have to be almost completely re-written to fit a neutral point of view. The second is that I have to echo the concerns that there's not enough justification to show that this specific aspect of holistic medicine merits a separate page in and of itself. I'd recommend starting a discussion at Talk:Holistic health about possibly making a small subsection about this or making a mention somewhere on the page, but for the most part I can't entirely see where this is so independently notable that it would really pass AfC at this point in time. That concern (which seems to be the predominant concern of everyone that declined the page) paired with the way the article was written, makes me think that if you did want to try at AfC again, it'd just be best to write a new article entirely. I still think that making a subsection would be the way to go, though.
Basically you'll need to re-write the entire thing from scratch and even then, this would probably be better off as a subsection in the existing article for holistic medicine. Re-posting a request over and over again in the hopes of getting someone to accept the request can be seen as both disruptive and deceptive. Please just go to the holistic medicine article and look about getting this as a subsection rather than an article or just re-write the article to focus on this specific branch. Just about everyone who declined the AfC was concerned with the fact that the article wasn't really about living medicine specifically and was a bit of mishmash of various things and didn't show how LM deserved an article separate from holistic medicine. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Baba Sangada

I got busy with college and could not edit the page for long. Baba Sangada Ji was the highly worshipped saint in Manhani Community of Patti town in Amritsar, India. There is a temple too where hundreds of devotees come every year to worship. I plan to finish this article soon now. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarunjaiyna (talk • contribs) 05:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Marcelo Henrique Almeida

This is a famous and recluse author in Brazil. The page was on Wikipedia for several months without any kind of objection. The page needs to be completed with sources and biography to follow Wikipedia guidelines properly, so I´m asking for this article to be undeleted so I can complete it. -JCarterJr (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Acharya Santosh Santoshi

I did'nt copy any content on this page. there is not any fake information on this page. this is not of any duplicate/fake page of any duplicate/fake person.

and then click the "Save page" button below -Manjeshkau (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Dear Sir

Greetings !!!

I 've create a page " Acharya Santosh Santoshi" three times...all times I got that this page is deleted. Kindly this is my humble request that please do'nt delete this page. kindly allow me to create this page. and be continue on this page. I did'nt copy any content on this page. there is not any fake information on this page. this is not of any duplicate/fake page of any duplicate/fake person. Kindly revert me back..

I am waiting for your valued response

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Yunshui 雲水 12:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj

I, Brownels, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I am afraid I missed the 6 month window to address editor concerns, which I have now done. Rupert Raj is the most important historical trans activist in Canada, and his work has been of tremendous historical significance--globally--in the late 1970s and the 1980s. Brownels (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Please read carefully the guide to writing WP:Your first article and the policies WP:Biographies of living persons and WP:Verifiability. You need references to reliable sources for two reasons: to verify what the article says, and to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Rupert Raj

This is regarding the page I submitted in September 2013. It was rejected for various uncontroversial reasons, and I did not get back to editing it within the 6 month window. I have now re-written the entry to address wiki concerns, and have resubmitted it (I think!). I would like to have the page un-deleted and reconsidered for inclusion. It might be that it has to get undeleted first, THEN I add the new entry, THEN it gets reconsidered. Regardless, I suspect I need to get the September 2013 entry 'undeleted' first. Thank you. -Brownels (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

 Not done for Rupert Raj, which was deleted (by me) in 2012 as a result of WP:Articles for deletion/Rupert Raj, and will not be restored because it was a CV, not an encyclopedia article. Your "resubmission" put your new draft on this page, which is not the place for it, and you correctly removed it yourself.
The right thing to do now is to update your September draft, which I have restored (see entry above) and submit it again. JohnCD (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vignesh Wadarajan

I, Gayathiri Mathivanan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gayathiri Mathivanan (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Page

A twelve year old child published two novels which is being sold in hardcopy, Amazon, Kindle, and iBookstore. She was interviewed on FOX10 News and front cover on newspaper. and then click the "Save page" button below -Anivarya (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

durga mohan bhattacharyya

Due to confirming the facts provided in the article -Joy Bhattacharya Rex (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done, because you wrote it and originally requested deletion yourself, the article is now restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steve Erdman

I, Zer0Fks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I was on a military deployment and couldn't make updates. Zer0Fks (talk) 15:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Kevin Whalum

Need to add the References: http://www.allaboutjazz.com/take-five-with-kevin-whalum-kevin-whalum-by-kevin-whalum.php#.U6GtkBbx7IM

http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/kevinwhalum “Album Notes” -Fairwave (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Fairwave/Kevin Whalum. Because the subject appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO criteria, and the sources you propose adding do not establish notability, the article would likely be deleted again if it remained in main article space. Please improve the article as a userspace draft, and submit it for review (there's a submit button at the top) when you're ready. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Ryan Sproul

Please restore the deleted edit history for this recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done, restored deleted history of both article and talk page. There wasn't much there in either case. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Zimbabwenewsday

The page should not be delated -Sendasambulo (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Evidently it should, and was. And if you are asking for undeletion...
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Alexf (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Malaria Day in the Americas

I received a notification that the page [Malaria Day in the Americas] had been deleted for violating G-11: Unambiguous advertising. I would like to say that this article piece has no intent to advertise or self-promote in any way. The Malaria Day in the Americas article is unbiased and has multiple third party sources in which i wil provide for you. The reason for attempting to publish this article on Wikipedia was to provide information about this particular subject that no known information is given about.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Natsnet23 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. If the intent was not advertising, it was certainly publicity, which amounts to the same thing. Wikipedia is not a publicity platform. Also, Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about some noble cause. I suggest using Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit an article on this topic. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Limited Runs

I, Jamiwr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamiwr (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. The article was only three sentences, there were zero sources, and it was promotional in tone. No benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring this. Please start over, using Wikipedia:Golden rule as a guide for whot is expected for an article. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivartana, the ICFP Kolkata Academic Theme

I, Bidisha Sarkar Datta, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bidisha Sarkar Datta (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


I had submitted the request for undeletion of this page a month back. However I am not able to figure out what is the status of that request. Kindly guide. Appologies for inonviniences created, if any.

Not done, as previously declined. See Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 135#Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivartana, the ICFP Kolkata Academic Theme. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Ben Fong

I, Sourcenetworks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sourcenetworks (talk) 22:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ottawa Fishing Festival

I, Sourcenetworks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sourcenetworks (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

The PACE Centre, Aylesbury

Significant new material to add that will result in publication — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sansian (talk • contribs) 12:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done, because there is nothing to do. The article never existed in main space, and it hasn't been deleted from Articles for Creation. Feel free to improve it and re-submit. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Ken Anderson (filmmaker)

Please restore edit history for this recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done by Graeme Bartlett. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Novocastrians RFC

I, 92.30.170.225, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.30.170.225 (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jesus Is My SuperHero (band)

I, Ashishben, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashishben (talk) 07:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

 Not done - no need to restore this draft, the article exists at JIMSH (band). I have also made a redirect from Jesus Is My SuperHero (band). JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I had carelessly not checked the mainspace article, which did not meet Wikipedia's requirements and has been deleted. You can work on this draft, but please read WP:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. It makes no difference that this is a non-profit and a Good Cause: the question is whether you can show references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to demonstrate WP:Notability to the standard explained at WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

JIMSH (band)

this should not be deleted because this is an non-profit band helping many slums,kids.And have nobody to support, only wikipedia can help us and then click the "Save page" button below -Ashishben (talk) 07:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

The article has not been deleted, see JIMSH (band). JohnCD (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
It likely soon will be deleted, though, as CSD A7. Apparently the article was on AFC and was then deleted as G13, and the author simply posted it to main space. The G13 AFC should have been restored and the main space version deleted. We can still do that. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
@Amatulic: ah, sorry about that, I should have checked the article and the history. I have done as you suggest - deleted the article and restored the AfC draft, see above. JohnCD (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jesus Is My SuperHero (band). I wish Ashishben luck with that; at this point it seems unlikely that the band will meet WP:BAND criteria. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andy Lakey

Dayfornightmm (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wang Haibo (2)

I, Jackbrownie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jackbrownie (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Not done Upon looking at the page, it looks like this is a page for a fictional character that someone created for a game. It doesn't look like it's a specific character along the lines of say, Solid Snake, and I can't see where this specific character has received the coverage necessary to meet notability guidelines. WP:NFOOTY does not apply to fictional characters and most will never receive the necessary coverage to merit their own articles. I really get the impression that this character was created by the game player as opposed to the game company itself, which will make it even more difficult to find sources for notability. Everything I found on a search came up as primary for the most part and I didn't find anything that would really back up notability for the character. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Wang Haibo

I forgot my login details and was unable to login but i've now retrieved my user information -Jackbrownie (talk) 23:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackbrownie (talk • contribs) 23:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: For this one, are you looking for a specific edit history? The problem here is that it looks like at one point this page was deleted as an attack page, so I'd have to know what you're specifically looking for. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Not done Upon looking at the AfC article, it became clear that this is not about a person in real life but a game character that seems to have been created by a player. It doesn't appear to be based on a real person and there's nothing to show that the character is notable enough to merit an entry. Given that part of the article's deleted history was an attack page, I don't think it's appropriate to re-create an article history for a non-notable fictional character. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_139&oldid=1138663690"