User talk:Brownels

Your submission at AfC Rupert Raj (September 7)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ajax F¡ore_talk 23:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj

Hello Brownels. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rupert Raj".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj. JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Rupert Raj was accepted

Rupert Raj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—LucasThoms 18:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Brownels. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 21:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

"Education Program talk:University of Toronto Mississauga/Queer Theory (Fall 2014)"

You have created "Education Program talk:University of Toronto Mississauga/Queer Theory (Fall 2014)". The title is in the form something colon something, but because the part before the colon isn't one of a small number of words or combinations (such as "User" and "User talk"), Wikipedia treats this as an article. But obviously it isn't an article.

I propose to move this somewhere whose name starts either "User:Brownels" or "User talk:Brownels"; for example, "User:Brownels:Education Program talk:University of Toronto Mississauga/Queer Theory (Fall 2014)". Which name would you like? -- Hoary (talk) 12:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoary--thanks. I am still learning. Either works for me! Brownels (talk) 13:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)brownels[reply]

Good, you're still learning. By contrast, it seems that I'm not: my brain is "fossilized". Yes, I'm embarrassed to realize this morning that there are indeed "Education Program" and "Education Program talk" namespaces (as these things are termed hereabouts); your use of "Education Program talk" seems perfectly fine. Sorry about the false alarm. (NB as of a couple of minutes ago, no page in en:Wikipedia (beside this one) was linking to "Education Program talk:University of Toronto Mississauga/Queer Theory (Fall 2014)", so your students would be unlikely to encounter it once they are within Wikipedia.) -- Hoary (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj

Hello, Brownels. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rupert Raj".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rupert Raj}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Change in your user rights

Your Wikipedia account was previously granted a user right called "course instructor" by the Wiki Education Foundation. That right enabled you to create a course page through the EducationProgram MediaWiki extension. Starting in fall 2015, the Wiki Education Foundation has discontinued its use of this extension. Going forward, users should create course pages through the Wiki Education Foundation website. That application is more user-friendly, and any content is automatically mirrored to Wikipedia. To prevent confusion, we'll be removing your "course instructor" user right, as it is not needed with the new system. This is simply a notification of the technical change to your account. No action is needed from you at this time.

If you plan on teaching with Wikipedia for the fall 2015 term, please email me (helainewikiedu.org) for instructions how to create your next course page using our new system. --Helaine (Wiki Ed) (talk), sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have not completed the student training.

Please complete the student training. If you have already gone through it, be sure to click the button at the end to record that you finished it. --Brownels (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St. Michael's College, Toronto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Troubling the Line, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, Waxworker. I was wondering. I'll do that. The sources are archival ones. Best, brownels. Brownels (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Brownels! Your additions to OutHistory have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 20:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! thanks for this feedback. However I don't know that you think I've written that is not properly attributed etc. Is there a way for me to see this? I thought I had done a decent job in this arena. Best, E Brownels (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]