Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Declined/Archive 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

User:House1090

I want to help out on whatever possible. I have been here in wikipedia for about 3-4 years, and I often help out when every possible, usually with 3rd Opinions. I thinks time I leave my comfort zone and I begin to help wikipedia in a better way. I want to make the most out of myself. I think this is what I need to make me a better wikipedia patroller. House1090 (talk) 00:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/House1090? -FASTILY (TALK) 00:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
That is my past and I am now ready to move on. Note:That was about two years ago. Thanks, House1090 (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
You have another block in March for violating 1RR on an article. That's fairly recent to be "moving on". ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 02:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Not an admin, but have been reviewing your contributions. I noted you were using multiple signatures in February. While I do not doubt the capacity for change, and you have made positive contributions per your edit history, I still see some issues. You might want to look at User:Jack Merridew, who has made a clean return after a much more contentious sockpuppetry case. N419BH 02:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I think, for now, it would be best to work on making the clean break from your past and showing that you can be productive for an extended period of time. So, for now, no Declined. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 02:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Here Under The Oaks

Interested in being a part of this historic advance. My gnome work might take me to relevant pages soon, to check out this feature. I am versed in the appropriate policies and guidelines. Here Under The Oaks (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
no Declined due to limited edits (66 as of this post) to review. While everything looks good so far, I think it would be good to show how you work through a few more edits. Please continue your good work, however, and you will likely be able to be granted this right after a bit. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 04:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:DJO CODY

I feel like i could better understand things by helping others be safe and to make sure they have up-t date info. DJO CODY (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience. Please take a few weeks to learn how the project works and request again at a later date. Nakon 19:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:ReneRomann

I'm regularly watching over some articles and also revert vandalism. Some translations from/to de.wp ReneRomann (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  •  Not done You only have just over a hundred edits and seem to have been almost inactive for some time. Suggest you familiarise yourself with regular editing a little more before rerequesting the new function. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Ltgreenb

I'd like to help protect and review changes on behalf of my firm. Ltgreenb (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You have only 8 edits and do not meet the requirements. Also, you should not be editing on behalf of your firm. —DoRD (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Danny247

I want to be a reviewer because I love contributing to the community here on Wikipedia and I am great at reviewing. I enjoy making edits and improving articles and the community aswell. Danny247 (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Would like to see a bit more in the way of contributions first. Please continue to edit and apply again in the future. Thanks.  7  09:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Tetevok

I need rights to upload the image for the article, which I'm creating about company "Guramex" Tetevok (talk) 13:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - will explain how to do that on your talk page.  7  13:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Toontown59153

I have been active on WP for a while now. I come here every day to look for edits I can make and I will continue to do so. Toontown59153 (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You only have 15 edits to English WP, and have not shown that you understand the policy reasons behind the Pending changes trial. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Saju wiki

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Saju wiki (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Admin,
Please provide me edit permission, I understand it's a highly responsible right, I can assure you that I will use this right with care. Recently I read some contents about Zakir Naik which clearly gave a baised comment. He has spoken in multiple occasion on a subject that is not referenced at all in the article I would like to just add them there.
Regards,
Sajan.
 Not done- non-admin, but as this is your first edit you should get a bit more experience around en.wp before requesting this right. Also, you can edit articles without the reviewer permission. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Admin {{not done}} concur. Note that we typically like to see at least 100 edits. —DoRD (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Pongleung

some errors on Nelson Mandela page Pongleung (talk) 04:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear sir/madam,
Hello, this is the first time I write on wikipedia.
I am from Hong Kong.
I would like to make some correction to Nelson Mandela wiki page
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Mandela )and add a link for the song.
Since I am a fans of the band, Beyond, I see that in the music tributes section. The name of the song, Days of Glory should be changed to Glorious days because it is easier for people to search this song on youtube. Also, I am sure it will be better if we place a link to this song. The following is the link.
" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn0ffRDqoUw " . This clip has an English lyric so it will be better for people to understand the song.
Hopefully, you can grant me the right to edit the above information or someone help to make it correct should also be fine.
Thank you very much.
 Not done - the Nelson Mandella page is protected, which requires a different process than the reviewer flag. Will leave you a note on your talk page. The Beyond (band) page can be edited by anyone.  7  06:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Karyasuman

These days, due to 2011 Cricket World Cup approaching and is very near, many unregistered and unknown users vandalise the page and delete many important information. Thus semi protection needed for this article. Thus please allow semi protection for this article. Karyasuman (talk) 01:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done This isn't the place to request semi protection- that would be WP:RPP. This page is for requesting the reviewer permission, which has to do with the pending changes trial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Heymid

Definitely something for me! /HeyMid (contributions) 18:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I believe it would be a grave error to give access to any tools to Heymid, who has been permbanned at Swedish Wikipedia. - Tournesol (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Can you provide some background on the sv.wiki block? Nakon 18:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Tournesol, LISTEN: This is English Wikipedia, and just because I am permanently blocked on Swedish Wikipedia, doesn't mean you should take a sneak peak at my edits. Thanks in advance. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Tournesol is definitely wrong, since I was never given a last chance and never warned before being permanently blocked and has nothing to do with me on English Wikipedia. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I now know you are constantly watching me on English Wikipedia. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't see where he's wrong, you _are_ indefinitely blocked on sv.wiki. Can you provide some more information on why you were blocked there? Nakon 18:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Of course I can. I know exactly why I got indefinitely blocked from editing on SvWp (Swedish Wikipedia). Simply, the reason was that I stole time from all the other users on SvWp. The reason as to why I haven't gotten a last chance yet, is they forgot the Wikipedia:Forgive and forget rule, which prevented me from moving on from the March and April 2010 incidents. But all this shouldn't threat me from getting a user tool. Also, maybe you are an administrator? I almost at the point where I feel like willing to request a block on Tournesol, since he is hunting me all-around English Wikipedia. That is simply irritating. He has been doing this ever since I got indefinitely blocked from SvWp (which happened on May 29, 2010).
Also, some people have called me a Troll. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I somehow ended up in the middle of this a couple of weeks ago after Heymid appeared on my talk page out of the blue and asked me to contact an svwiki admin. From what I've seen of a google translated ban discussion on the svwiki equivalent of ANI and from Heymid's contributions here, I think he lacks sufficient judgement to be trusted with the reviewer permission. As to the alleged trolling, I have thus far assumed good faith and advise Heymid in the strongest possible terms to keep his head down- advice which I'll reiterate now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, per above. Nakon 21:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User:FallenAngelsandDemons

I have edited for quite a while. This is an interesting new addition to Wikipedia I would like to explore, and hopefully to be helpful to the cause. FallenAngelsandDemons (talk) 16:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done With <50 edits, I'm afraid you don't yet have the necessary experience to use this tool properly. Consider editing around for a little while, then come back and request the tool again. -FASTILY (TALK) 17:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Siddhartha.lahiri

I modify articles frequently. Would like to access Reviewer rights to specifically review Buddhism and Information Technology related articles. SID 08:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You have less than 70 edits, and I'm not sure if you have enough experience to be trusted with reviewer rights, please re-apply when you have more experience (when you have about 500 or more edits under your belt) and then I or another admin would be happy to grant you the rights once we see you have a good understanding of policy. Best, Mifter (talk) 13:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Apuman

I want to be a reviewer because I think I could help a lot. Being the kind of person who used to vandalize, I know what sorts of things vandals do and how to tell. Apuman (talk) 19:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I would direct the reviewers to this edit. [1] And this edit from last week [2] The experience of vandalism will be quite fresh in the users memory. Active Banana (talk) 21:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes, as your contributions (including recent ones) haven't been terribly helpful,  Not done. —DoRD (talk) 21:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Faizan Mæġester

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Faizan Mæġester (talk) 12:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
i want to add a social network site of pakistan pakfacebook is the largest social network of pakistan http://www.pakfacebook.com
 Not done - That is not what the reviewer permission is for and with only one edit, you do not meet the criteria. You do not need this permission to create an article, but please be sure to read through the information I have posted on your talk page. —DoRD (talk) 13:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Themaxviwe

I previously had this right,but was removed due to lack of experience.Now, I have more that 950 edits and I have been on wikipedia forthree months and 8 days.I have also read the Wikipedia Policies. Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 07:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Please discuss with User:OlEnglish instead of coming here. Courcelles (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

User:McYel

I've read the guideline on reviewing, Wikipedia's policy on vandalism, and understand what is and what is not vandalism. I'm familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I also routinely edit, and have a reasonable editing history. McYel (talk) 17:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
{{done}} —DoRD (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - revoked the above due to growing concerns about this user. —DoRD (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

User:MZMcBride

—Preceding unsigned comment added by NerdyScienceDude (talk • contribs) 03:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Consulted user before adding. No reason not to... unless he doesn't want it. Jclemens (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
User has over 65,000 contributions and would be trusted with it (his edits won't need to be reviewed). ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 03:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Certainly eligible for it, but I'll wait for the reply. —DoRD (talk) 12:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't think asking him is necessary. Several users got the permission without filing a request. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 14:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Some users prefer to operate with no permissions; this is one of the reasons third-party requests are only accepted at WP:PERM/AP. –xenotalk 14:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 Done I added it before I saw Xeno's comments- many people have been given the permission without asking for it. If MZ decides he doesn't want it, he can ask me or another admin to remove it. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

What the fuck? This page isn't supposed to be used like this. HJ Mitchell: You know this. Remove the rights immediately. There's a list here for exceptions: Wikipedia:Database reports/Potential reviewer candidates/Exceptions. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Very well,  removed HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Trust me, it's notable

Hi. I am an active editor of Wikipedia last year, although it took me many months before I registered. Although my contributions are quite few, for now, I assure that I will be an active reviewer and I have enough experience dealing with Vanadlism. Trust me, it's notable (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Most of your edits have been to user talk pages and to a single article. Based on your second edit, it seems like you registered to make a point about that article. Some of your other early edits give me cause to question your intentions here...Nikkimaria (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
And  Not done per Nikkimaria. -FASTILY (TALK) 19:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Ratinator

Over the last few days, I have had some certain conflicts. However I have been making some constructive edits on the Wikipedia Articles For Creation page and I leave warnings against vandals whenever possible. When I come on to Wikipedia, I revert at least ten vandalism incidents and leave warnings where appropriate. If you do not believe me, I have been establishing a track record of good edits which you are welcome to look at before making your decision. Thanks! Ratinator·Talk 16:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, but there are too many recent incidents in your history. You may apply again later when it is clear that you have a good grasp of our policies. —DoRD (talk) 16:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Note that I've just blocked this user for canvassing admins to review this request. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Ratinator

I think I have demonstrated that I do have a better grasp of the policies of Wikipedia. I certainly do know the difference between good and bad faith edits and I haven taken time to revise and evaluate the previous mistakes I have made by apologizing and receiving and working by constructive criticism. I was told that I am doing good work by: Reverting vandalism, marking articles for creating correctly, leaving constructive criticism, leaving warnings where appropriate, reading guides about Wikipedia before attempting or applying for something new. I kindly request that you provide me a more deatialed explanation of the closing statement as I think I have demonstrated a deep understanding. Thanks, There is no reason why I would abuse this tool. Ratinator·Talk 18:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done User blocked for canvassing admins to review this request. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Ozurbanmusic

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights ozzyg (talk) 01:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Justice Crew
Hi, I am requesting semi protection for the article, Justice Crew, the article has recently received a few vandalisms from non-registered users & has had to be reverted back to the last revision by the last editor of the article. The article is about a group of boys who dance so teenage girls who are not registered users would do anything to write false information on their. I hope you understand. Cheers ozurbanmusic (talk)
This is not the place to request article protection. See here. Tyrol5 [Talk] 01:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done as explained directly above. —DoRD (talk) 01:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Wikismart03

Although I’ve been contributing to Wikipedia since February, I’ve done over 1,000 edits (both English and Spanish), without having any conflicts against the Wikipiedia Content Policies on any of my edits. I feel I’m a good candidate to become a reviewer. Wikismart03 (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - You do not have very many edits, and the ones you do have are all either in your userspace or to a single article (and are mostly minor edits). Tiptoety talk 22:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

User:CyberEditor

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights CyberEditor (talk) 20:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I like to edit articles by doing research and basing my edits on facts. This definitely adds to the credibility of Wikipedia.

 Not done - With only 48 edits you are too inexperienced. Tiptoety talk 20:36, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Id dude

I was a frequent anonymous user, editing documents that appeared to be vandalized. I have since created a user account and frequently scroll through the Recent Changes list and undo/repair vandalized pages Id dude (talk) 04:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 Not done. While I respect you have edited previously, reviewer is granted to more experienced users because of the possibility of misuse. You may, however, be interested in requesting the rollback right. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 07:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Note that the requirements for rollback are significantly more stringent than those for reviewer. —DoRD (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Ozurbanmusic

I am requesting semi-protection for the article, Justice Crew because it seems to be getting vandalised a few times from IP users, who are not contributing new information about the crew but are writing inappropriate comments about the members of the crew, and it needs to stop now! Check out what they wrote in the article's history. This has happened before. I hope you accept my request. ozurbanmusic (talk) 03:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - Requests of this nature belong at WP:RFPP. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 06:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Lordalpha1

SO i can find controversial topics LordAlpha1 20:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Your editing history consists largely of file uploads and edits to those files. Please reapply when you have more mainspace edits to review. —DoRD (talk) 22:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Declined/Archive_1&oldid=1190234556"