Summary

If you want to let me know something, please put it below.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Lordalpha1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

98.245.185.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Fanaticeggs". The reason given for Fanaticeggs's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Fetchcomms (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Same person, now directly blocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lordalpha1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

recently, my wifi network was hacked. i didn't notice it until i found out that things were missing from my network folders. so, i checked my accounts for security, and my wikipedia account said that i've been blocked. i appealed the block, but an admin said that i was abusing multiple accounts. i tried to contact him, but no reply. i have not "abused multiple accounts", and i wish to be unblocked. please review my request. regards, lordalpha1

Decline reason:

Per WP:GOTHACKED, if your account's been compromised we leave it blocked. Merry Christmas! — Daniel Case (talk) 23:40, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The contributions of Lordalpha1 are unlike those of Fanaticeggs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I am therefore inclined to believe that Fanaticeggs is a different person and grant this unblock request. I'm leaving this open to get the input of other admins. Sandstein 17:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see.

At 00:17, Fanaticeggs makes this lovely edit.
At 00:18, Fanaticeggs is blocked.
At 00:20, User:Lordalpha1 requests unblocking from an autoblock, after not editing for a couple of days.

As blocking admin, I too will leave this to another admin to consider. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lordalpha1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i'm sorry for the misunderstanding. firstly, my wifi network got hacked, NOT my account. before my appeal, my ip address was set to be blocked until today. however, once jp gordon reviewed it, i was blocked indefinitely, and my ip was not blocked anymore. so, i don't think that this situation refers to the "gothacked" policy. i have secured my wifi network (changing it from wep to wpa2), so i wish for my account to be unblocked because of a misunderstanding. regards and merry christmas.

Decline reason:

Continuing to create accounts (like User:Botalpha1) does not help your case. Furthermore, Jpgordon is exactly correct - you are Fanaticeggs. TN X Man 17:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Possibly unfree File:WOT Web of Trust - Search Screen1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WOT Web of Trust - Search Screen1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chrome windows.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chrome windows.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HitchhikersCover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HitchhikersCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Explorer Windows 7.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Explorer Windows 7.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]