Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Declined/Archive 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

User:Patsfan121994

Often on to browse and such. Makes me feel good to change and edit necessary things and make the world a better place.
 Not done - While I appreciate the sentiment, I don't feel 15 edits are enough for us to evaluate your suitability for this tool, nor for you to gain a good understanding of how the wiki-world works. Feel free to try again in a couple of months. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I have been using Wikipedia for years and have only made an account up late, and you're going to tell me I'm not qualified? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patsfan121994 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 26 September 2010
While you may have edited Wikipedia for years, there is no proof of your work on Parsfan121994. SYSS Mouse (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Rafiwiki

Want to be a part of wikipedia Reviewer team to help with reviewing articles... Thank you Rafiwiki (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, your recent edits show that you need a bit more experience with Wikipedia. Please take a few weeks to familiarize yourself with the project and feel free to request again later. Nakon 04:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Mrmewe

Hope to be able to contribute in a more meaningful way to the community Mrmewe (talk) 02:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, your recent edits suggest that you may need a few more weeks of editing before being granted +reviewer. Nakon 03:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Anikingos

try me out please Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Recent edits do not justify granting of this permission. Polargeo (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay there, i'll sty again later.Anirudh Emani (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Cshi100

I am very good at editing and I can spot even the smallest mistake.I have edited a lot, but some as anonymous. Cshi100 (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience. Nakon 21:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Tpxpress

I am a trusty wikipedia user and am well established. I have been using wikipedia for years. Thanks for considering me for the job Tpxpress (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - Too few edits at this time. Tiptoety talk 19:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll try again soon Tpxpress (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Jeffwang16

I have recently earned a barnstar for my works on the Chilean mine collapse article, and I have read everything about being a reviewer. I have been warned many times about vandalism, but I have changed and stopped ever since. --Jeffwang16 (Talk) (Contributions) (Email me!) 23:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Reviewer only allows you to accept edits on pending changes-protected articles. While your efforts are great, you haven't gained much experience in that area. In fact, as far as I can see, you've only ever made one edit on a PC-protected article. A little more relevant experience would serve you well. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Whoop whoop pull up

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights: Have experience, am requesting reviewer rights Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, but edits such as this (unsourced contentious material about a living person) or this show that you do not have a good grasp of policies such as WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:VANDALISM. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Yadavjpr

I am java developer. I have knowledge of many java technologies like apache wicket, GWT, git, gerrit, scala, yaml etc. I am from Jaipur, India. So can contribute my knowledge about java technologies and my local places. Yadavjpr (talk) 04:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience. Nakon 15:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Enm7

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Enm7 (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I would like to become a reviewer because there are some pages that are semiprotected that I am more or less an expert on. IE Runescape. I play this game constantly and the guide needs a few changes/additions here and there and I can't get them added because other reviewers disagree with the general public.

 Not done - Thanks for wanting to help out, but you haven't made enough contributions yet to be granted this tool. I recommend you keep working on article building without it for another month or two, and then re-request the permission. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Okay I'll try but I'm not Always on so not sure how many contributions I can make. Thank you for the reply. Also I apologize for any previous Vandalisms I may have committed. I looked at my contributions and noticed it looked like I had, but I don't remember them as ts been so long. I have grown up since then so I promise it wont ever happen again. I don't even know why I would have done that in the first place. I love Wikipedia and it is my first choice for research.

User:Denisxavier

This would be a nice way to start making bigger contributions to Wikipedia. Denisxavier (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You haven't made enough contributions yet to be granted this tool. I recommend you keep working on article building without it for another month or two, and then re-request the permission. I'm noticing your general lack of experience includes any articles under this system. Courcelles 03:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your advices.Denisxavier (talk) 03:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

User:TucsonDavid

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights TucsonDavid (talk) 18:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I know i'm new but I would like to start out with a little trust and volunteering to help the wiki community as a reviewer seams a great way to start. Thanks for your consideration.TucsonDavid (talk) 18:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I discovered that one of your recent edits [1] was a copyright violation. Some of the text that you added on the Tactical Beacon article has been copied from http://www.janes.com/articles/Janes-Avionics/BE499-TACBE-Tactical-Beacon-United-Kingdom.html. I'm afraid a reviewer also has to understand copyright violations. Minimac (talk) 19:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

You are correct I do need some more experience. That beacon edit was made in good faith though. But I withdraw my request for reviewers rights.TucsonDavid (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

 Not done for the benefit of the archiving bot. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Goswamir14

I think that I would make a good reviewer because, although my edit count is not necessarily the highest, I have an excellent grasp of English, and have nearly no spelling mistakes. I have also identified spam and vandalism, and have fixed grammatical errors and tense in several articles. I also understand the tools needed to properly revise on Wikipedia. Goswamir14- www.rohangoswami.webs.com 20:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry. You have only approx. 150 edits and the vast majority is to your own userspace. I'd like to see some more experience please.

User:Mikedux

I have been adding and editing articles as a responsible user for over 4 years, and would like to help the review process. Mikedux (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 Not done I'm sorry but you don't seem to have much experience in the behind-the-scenes areas of Wikipedia, so I can;t really evaluate your understanding of the policies that govern pending changes and reviewing. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Krisrsu

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Kris (talk) 03:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

I've develop interest in maintaining the integrity of wikipedia. This is a step toward that goal.

 Not done, I don't see any anti-vandalism experience. Please try one of the non-rollback tools for a few weeks and feel free to reapply later. Nakon 03:44, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry about the confusion above, I must have misread the request. Still, I don't see enough experience at this time to assign +reviewer. Nakon 23:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Ghane

Hi, my changes have concentrated on typos, broken links, and negatives that change the meaning of the sentence. I am good at proof-reading, and parsing complicated arguments. I can assist in reviewing content to see if it fits in the structure of the document, or if it is extraneous. Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta 08:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
(non-admin comment) Hi, it seems you have been on the wiki since 2004, but have accumulated about 110 edits, in my opinion, more is needed for a reviewer. I am not an admin, so they may think differently. Tofutwitch11 (TALK) 20:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Your edits are great, but reviewer isn't much help with typo fixing. I'd like to see more experience that shows you understand things like WP:VAND and WP:BLP. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Understood. I do need to read up more on the policies. Thanks. - Sanjeev "ghane" Gupta 02:34, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Brianlo747

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Brianlo747 (talk) 07:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi I am brianlo747. I would like to help wikipedia by being a reviewer so I can prevent vandalism. I have seen several cases of vandalism on some pages and have edited them to remove the bad parts. I have recently edited and removed the vandalized parts of the Singapore International School page as it contains inappropriate content. I would appreciate if I could be a reviewer to help the wikipedia community. If my request is rejected, please tell me why. I would do anything reasonable to fulfill the requirements to be a reviewer. Warm regards, brianlo747

 Not done, not enough experience at this time. Nakon 16:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Orashmatash

I am requesting Reviewer rights, because I comply with the required criteria, and routinely edit, but only when necessary. I also would like an element of responsibility. Orashmatash (talk) 21:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience at this time. Nakon 22:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

User:MC RIDE

Editing Wikipedia for a few years now and would like to test the Reviewer out. (talk) 04:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Just a month ago, you copied copyrighted text into an article[2]. I would rather not give you the reviewer at this time, as additional scrutiny of your edits may be needed. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Orashmatash

I have been editing Wikipedia with only my IP adress for a while now, and I created this account earlier in the year to edit semi-protected pages, and to create my own. I do meet the criteria for reviewer rights, and I would very much enjoy having an element of responsibility. Orashmatash (talk) 19:43, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, nothing has changed since your last request which is still on this page. Nakon 21:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Supernovablackholedarkmatter

I am constantly using Wikipedia and in the case that I find any error in an article I always confirm that it is, in fact, an error using reliable resources outside Wikipedia (for example Dictionary.com for any spelling errors"). I am more focused on the grammar and spelling errors when I'm not in my "area"(chemistry) trusting that the author has inputted valid information. I have been searching through some semi-protected articles (such as the article "Jimmy Whales") and have found some errors, yet due to the fact that I don't have permission to edit these errors it has not been possible for me to correct them. It is so that I request permission to review such articles. Supernovablackholedarkmatter (talk) 03:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience (only 11 edits) at this time. Nakon 03:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Devx101

I have been editing wiki pages for almost a year now and would like to check the new feature. Mainly into reverting of vandalism and content enhancements. I am fully aware of the Wikipedia guidelines and policy's too devx101 [TALK] 09:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 Not done You have no idea about which edit should be marked as a minor edit. This diff does not speak too appreciably about your reviewing abilities. Add to that the fact that since you were blocked for copyright violation four months ago or so, I have not noticed considerable contributions. Please re-apply after gaining more experience and understanding our editing policy appropriately. Thanks. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Stilwebm

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Stilwebm (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I am a long time contributor of original content, editing, and remove all vandalism I find. I stay up-to-date on Wikipedia policies before making edits of any kind.

 Not done I don't think you have enough experience at the minute. You only have 93 edits, of which less than half a dozen were made after the introduction of pending changes and you didn't manage to format this request properly. If you're interested I helping with pending changes, spend a few months gaining the experience that would allow you to detect the kind of edits pending changes is designed to weed out. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Bill william compton

I fulfill all the listed conditions as require, working on several wikiProjects and task force, have fought against vandalism several times and willing to expand my work-area Bill william compton (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, I think you still need more experience. Your recent edits show that you still need a better understanding of our biographies of living persons policy, and the level of sourcing and sensitivity needed to handle such articles. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Applaka90

I am happy user of wikipedia so i had the skills to contribute for years... but now i also have the motivation and the time, thank you :) Applaka90 (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 Not done With only 40 edits, I'm afraid you don't have the requisite experience for me to be sure you understand the workings of pending changes and the policies that it's intended to enforce. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi HJ Mitchell :) ..Well i've been editing and using wikipedia for years like i've said (without using a username)- so i can contribute and i want to contribute... Applaka90 (talk) 22:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

replying... You may wish to look at Wikipedia:Reviewing, an essay about this "bit". You don't need this approval to contribute to Wikipedia; I'd suggest getting a bit more experience using this account & make the request sometime in the future. Skier Dude (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Supercooljs2

I edit articles on Wikipedia to make it better. Supercooljs2 (talk) 22:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Some of your recent edits suggest you could use a little more experience. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Boolyme

I have been here for about two and a half years now and have become an active contributor to Wikipedia. I have been blocked in the past for violation of NPOV and VAN but I have reread the rules and have respected all the guidelines since my return and helped with some major and minor editings Boolyme (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 Not done, block is too recent. Nakon 20:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

User:patsfan121994

Patsfan121994 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)

This is my second request. I have spent some time experimenting on the site and I believe i have advanced in my skill. I understand others who have been accepted have been blocked in the past but i believe i have been fine. I have many updates of late. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patsfan121994 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

 Not done, You have only made 3 article edits since your last request, and one was an incomplete AFD nomination. Nakon 20:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Thebirdlover

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Thebirdlover (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC) I have been a user for just under a year and I have expirence helping admins block sockpuppets and using Twinkle. The reason I would want to be a reviewer is so I can help the community by keep the content of the wiki as good as possible by reverting possible vandalism. I think this will also be good training if I ever want to become an Admin.
Thebirdlover has some good edits. But however, see [3], [4] where he reverted an editor's blanking of their own talk page, [5] where he warned a blocked editor, and see this unexplained revert, and [6] where he used uw-vandalism3 as a first warning. Lord Porchcrop POWER 22:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I thought the "unexplained revert" violated the NPOV policy. --Thebirdlover (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

 Not done Given Porchcop's diffs, I think a little more experience would be beneficial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Nyswimmer

I use Wikipedia a lot and would like to help it out by being a reviewer. Nyswimmer (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience at this time. Nakon 21:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

User:GutiLucian02

Hello i am an experienced wikipedist and i request to see which problems of writing are

Guti 19:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

 Not done Your request makes little sense, which doesn't make me confident that you know what reviewer is or that you can use it effectively. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Snickers696969

I have been an active user and contributor to wikipedia for more then 2 years, Mostly working on sports related articles updating and confirming uncited statistics. Would love to be able to contribute more time revisions to a great site Snickers696969 (talk) 00:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 Not done You don't appear to have much experience, nor have you (as far as I can see) edited a [age on pending changes. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

User:9mmtylenol

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights 9mmtylenol (talk) 06:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
I have been a member for 4 years, with much experiance, and aid in additions and amendments to recent credible info on current aticles.
 Not done 14 edits since: 2009-07-29 - I don't see any activity on pages with pending-changes enabled.  7  06:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Ankit Maity

I want to be a reviewer because I care for Wikipedia and want to improve it by having some more rights. I have already reviewed some good article nominations on Wikipedia. Even if I don't become a reviewer I understand. Thank you Ankit Maity 07:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 Not done - Not enough experience/edits at this time. Feel free to refile for reviewer rights in a few months or so. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 21:05, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

User:ISponges

I would like Reviewer permissions because I would like to help Wikipedia with reviewing pending articles, and to edit more pages. ISponges (talk) 01:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience at this time. Nakon 02:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Suri 100

Suri 100 13:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I am a registered user with active edits which mostly ranges from once to four times a day. From the day I created my account in Wikipedia, I have been addicted to Wikipedia. I also have played a role in speedy deletion of article since I use Twinkle. If you grant me reviewer rights, I shall do my best in reverting vandalism and I will do my best in making Wikipedia,the best encyclopedia. I have also read the guidelines for becoming a reviewer.

 Not done A good start at making useful contributions, but not enough experience yet. Feel welcome to ask again in a few months or so. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Basalisk

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights basalisk (talk) 01:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I am committed to improving wikipedia, especially technical improvements such as re-wording unclear passages in articles and correcting spelling and grammar. I feel I am ready to advance my involvement in wikipedia to vetting pending edits, and look forward to playing a more involved role.

 Not done I want to thank you for your commitment to Wikipedia; however, at just over 50 edit, it is difficult to assess your experience in dealing with possible flagged BLP violations. Please continue to help out around the site, undoing vandalism from your watch-list and articles you are working on and maybe after a couple hundred edits, you can request rollback rights, and then later down the road, possibly reviewer. Also many of the things you stated above you can do even without the reviewer rights. Kindly Calmer Waters 23:40, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Casperruegg

I have worked hard to contribute on Wikipedia and have added many citations and brief changes to improve it, and I would like this privellage to be able to, more efficiently, edit wikipedia for the benefit of it's users Casperruegg (talk) 16:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Casperruegg
 Not done Account is still very new. Would prefer to see a little more experience. -- œ™ 07:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Orashmatash

I have been a member of Wikipedia for almost a year now, and feel I am ready to be included as a Reviwer. I am familiar with all relevant policies, and would like to improve Wikipedia. Orashmatash (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Not comfortable with your experience level. The majority of your edits are to your userspace. You are still very much able to improve Wikipedia without this permission. -- œ™ 07:19, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Krisma12234

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights km 04:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Hello. I ama wikipedia member for about 1 year. I edit books in real life.
 Not done Sorry, but you have not made enough contributions to show that you can be trusted with the reviewer flag. Unfortunately, what you have done in real life has little bearing on your qualifications for this right. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

User:KingOfOrange

I would like to be given permission to edit the article Libya, particularly the section that was named Libya under Gadaffi. The majority of the article "Libya" is readable, the sections on the history of Libya are very well done, but the section Libya under Gadaffi needs a lot of work. It is taking information from other wikipedia articles without linking to them or giving credit to where they come from. Also, Libya under Gadaffi needs help with dating events that are mentioned. I have made a series of corrections, including one to the title of the section, and would like to have permission to edit the article before I make any more changes. I am familiar with using the wikipedia editor and have used it on other articles in need of editing help KingOfOrange (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done You do not need this permission in order to edit the article. Ruslik_Zero 19:50, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

User:DrFurey

I am always irritated to those people who constantly vandalize wikipedia and I'll do my best to spot and correct them. Kanut0 (talk) 16:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Hi DrFurey, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia thus far. Unfortunately, you do not have enough experience editing to be able to have this right. Fortunately, you do not need the reviewer right (or any other rights) to fight vandalism. See Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism for more information. Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

User:DarkfireII13

I'm a good canidate because, I am experianced,with dealing with vandilism,I understand what is vandlism and what vandilism is not,the point of neutrality,I have undone vandlism,warned people about vandilism,and I think I deserve the right to review. DarkfireII13 (talk) 17:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm concerned that your recent edits demonstrate that in fact you don't know what is and what isn't vandalism, but I'll leave it for another admin more used to the ways of this forum to decide whether that's an issue for +reviewer. BencherliteTalk 14:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Your experience is still insufficient (as your edits to this page have shown). Please, reapply in 1-2 months when you have a better understanding of how Wikipedia works. Ruslik_Zero 17:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes but Before this account I had another account that was compromised,it's name was DarkfireII2. DarkFireII13 14:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Devx101

I would like to try out this feature to help Wikipedia in a better way.I had once been blocked a long time back due to copyright stuff but since then i have greatly changed my understanding of Wikipedia and its policies. devx101 [TALK] 18:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Going back to last September, I don't see anywhere that you might have had a need for this, nor where you've demosntrated an understanding of things like vandalism, BLP and copyright. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

My dedication to wiki had not been deterred by that. I kept on my work @ wiki as usual. Anyone may have a bad past but it can erased by good work. For the last 7-8 months i have had no issues, just that one block seems to damned me eternally. My recent edits have completely focused on reverting vandalism, hence i would like to reapply.-- devx101 [TALK] 18:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Cleetusreese

I am requesting reviewer rights so that I may assist in the editing of vandalism and misinformation on Wikipedia's pages, particularly for my friend's band's page, which I've been writing. It's recently started to become a target for random IP vandalism as the band's popularity is growing, so I also hope to get the page protected in the near future. Cleetusreese (talk) 21:54, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done you only have 12 edits in total, of which ten are to an article where you seem to have a conflict of interest. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:20, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Shuipzv3

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Shuipzv3 (talk) 10:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I would like to help out with weeding out vandalism in the English Wiki. I believe I can maintain a neutral point-of-view when reviewing articles. Shuipzv3 (talk) 10:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

 Not done You experience is still quite limited (ca 100 edits only). I advise you to apply later. Ruslik_Zero 14:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks for considering my request anyway. Shuipzv3 (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

User:DarkfireII13

I always revert vandalism and report users who have done the vandalism, I also have an understanding of all the Wikipedia policies.I also am very active and get on every weekday to check Wikipedia. DarkFireII13 14:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Just a week ago, you really misidentified what is and what is not vandalism. This diff also concerns me dearly. How can we trust you with reviewer if just today you go on a vandalism-only account's talk page and "laugh"? —GFOLEY FOOL— 01:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

User:T g7

t_g7 T g7 (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done You do not yet have the track record required to become a reviewer, and looking over your talk page, it appears that there are serious issues with many of your edits. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 01:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Feedintm

For the short time I have been here, I have been very active in reverting vandalism while patrolling recent changes. This has made me familiar with Wikipedian policies. I am committed to protecting the integrity of Wikipedia and making sure that it is a reliable source. Thank you, Feedintm (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done. You've used Twinkle to revert edits that weren't obvious vandalism, e.g., [7]. Read WP:VANDALISM, keep editing, and feel free to reapply. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

User:The computer rocks!

To help combat vandalism The computer rocks! (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you don't seem to have done any anti-vandalism work yet. Reviewer is generally granted to people who've shown that they can identify what is and isn't considered vandalism, which is necessary for proper use of the tool. If you want to establish this track record, you should begin by reverting vandalism without it, perhaps by monitoring recent changes, or using Lupin's anti-vandal tool. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done for now, per Feezo. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Joker264

I would like to request Reviewer rights. I have made numerous edits and I feel that I know what constitutes to vandalism. Joker264 (talk) 08:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done. you certainly do. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 08:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Coolhawks88

i may not be the best wiki user, as I have made some mistakes but the reason I'm requesting to be a reviewer is wiki articles are being vandalize way too often, so i'm willing to help prevent future vandals from ruining the hard edits... Coolhawks88 (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done I'm sorry. You appear to be editing in good faith, but numerous editors have voiced concerns about you. I'm particularly troubled by this comment — interaction with other editors is necessary for a collaborative project such as Wikipedia. The Reviewer tool has the potential to bring you into conflict with other editors, and the ability and willingness to communicate are required to effectively use it. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 01:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Purplepox01

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights 01001010101010010101001 (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to be granted reviewer rights because firstly, I am against vandalism. I understand the wp:vandalism very well and can determine between vandalism and good faith edits. I would not bite the newcommers, and I think that also, Reviewer rights would be able to let me participate better on this project and other articles with the review status. Thank you for listening, 01001010101010010101001 (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

 Not done Did you seriously try to link to ED's 'offended' page? I would reject your request outright for this. Otherwise, I'm seeing a good faith, but somewhat inexperienced editor. I'm sorry to bring this up, but your communication skills also need work — your message here to Wintertanager was almost meaninglessly vague. As a reviewer, you would be expected to be able to effectively defend your decisions when challenged, and at present I am dubious about your ability to do this. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Oddbodz

While I have not been on Wikipedia for very long and in my first few days I made some big mistakes I have now turned around and I feel that the number of usful edits makes up for the few bad edits I made at the start. I have been fighting vandalism and have used my experiances to make sure that I am kind to new comers and warn them in a kinder way than I was treated while still getting the message across. To help do this I have joined many WikiProjects, in particular the WikiProject on User Warnings. I am also a new pages patroller. I would love this tool to make fighting vadalism easier. Oddbodz (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done, sorry. You've been very active in the month since your block, which is great, but during that time you've made elementary mistakes, such as welcoming users (1, [8]) who have been here far longer than yourself. Slow down, ease up on the use of templates, and use care in your messages to other editors. Not every situation calls for a boilerplate response; communication skills, especially when one is exercising a right such as reviewer, are essential. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 19:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I understand where you are coming why my request has been declined. However, i feel that however long a user has been here, they should still have a welcome as the first thing that is on their user page. This was shown when a user who had been here longer than me who I welcomed came to thank me on my talk page. The other user you refrenced had not recieved a welcome from me. Oddbodz (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Did you read {{uw-vandalism1}}? It includes the phrase "Welcome to Wikipedia", which is definitely inappropriate for a user welcomed more than five years ago. I'm not saying you can't ever have Reviewer, but you need to slow up the frenetic pace, and take care in composing messages. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 08:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Trananh1980

I joined Wikipedia one year ago and I have made 3,810 edits. I want to help prevent vandalism which is one of the main reasons frustrating me when I create new articles Trananh1980 (talk) 03:35, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Say waaaaa? You only have 101 edits. Am I missing something. mauchoeagle 03:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Yeah. Most of them are on the Vietnamese Wikipedia; see [9]. However, it also appears he's blocked there, so I'm hesitant to grant reviewer based on those edits, at least without an explanation. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, i forgot to explain. I am mostly active in Vietnamese. I was blocked for an expiry of one month because of a dispute between me and a Vietnamese sysop regarding nothing relating to article editing. I hold full responsibility for every detail about myself i provide here. Thank you!--Trananh1980 (talk) 23:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
For more info about me, please click here.--Trananh1980 (talk) 00:00, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Google translations from Vietnamese to English for Trananh1980's User contributions and Block log. Msnicki (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
For further detail regarding my block, you can ask our bureaucrat. I hope his opinion will help. Thanks--Trananh1980 (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done I'm sorry, but when taking into consideration a user's experience, we can only evaluate what they've done on en.wiki; because of that, I'm awfully sorry, but I don't feel comfortamble with giving you this flag for the moment. Please do keep up the good work and reapply in a couple of months, if you're still interested. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
That's fine. I hope this feature will be built into other languages soon. Thank you for your kindness!--Trananh1980 (talk) 02:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Qantasplanes

I've been editing for almost a year now. Made more than 200 edits and made one new article and have read the guidelines. Qantasplanes (talk) 06:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 Not done Given the recent notices on your talk page, I think you need to spend more time reading up on Wikipedia policies and guidelines before asking for this bit. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:38, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for advice... Qantasplanes (talk) 05:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Alam567

I edit Wikipedia often, and I understand that vandalism is disruptive and bad. As a reviewer, I try hard to revert all vandalism. Alam567 (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 Not done for now. You really need to get a few more edits first across a wider range of articles. -- WOSlinker (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Yleonmgnt

The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandun_DeShay page is repeatedly vandalized and I would like to add a automatic revert option to this page so that I do not have to fix it every two days. Thank you very much. Yleonmgnt (talk) 06:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 Not done An 'automatic revert option' can't be installed on one page, so far as I know. The reverting tool is Rollback, not reviewer, and I feel you don't need that. You only seem to edit one article, and Rollback is for general fighting of vandalism. I'm also slightly concerned about an element of 'ownership' (WP:OWN and an element of conflict of interest (WP:COI) as your username suggests a management role - are you with the management for this person? Peridon (talk) 13:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Danielkueh

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights mezzaninelounge (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

I have read all the policies and guidelines related to reviewer rights and agree to abide by them. I feel I am ready for this as I have a reasonable history of editing frequently on Wikipedia. If given this privilege, I would continue to do my best to combat vandalism and remove edits that are inconsistent with Wikipedia's basic content and legal policies.

 Not done – Per the message at the top of the page, Pending Changes is being withdrawn, so the reviewer permission is basically redundant. EdJohnston (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:TomHial

I've read the applicable policies and guidelines regarding my obligations as a Wikipedia reviewer. I pledge to fully abide by those rules, and to use the privilege of review to constructively build and maintain current and future Wikipedia articles. TomHial (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 Not done – Per the message at the top of this page, WP:Pending Changes is being withdrawn. The Reviewer permission is now redundant. Sorry for the confusion. EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Karl 334

Have rollback rights, reviewer rights will help me in the fight against Vandalism. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 21:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 Not done – Per the message at the top of this page, WP:Pending Changes is being withdrawn. The Reviewer permission is now redundant. Sorry for the confusion. EdJohnston (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Imadjafar

I agree to abide by the reviewing guidelines outlined expectations. I mainly edit articles on the Hebrew Bible, New Testament and Qur'an which are frequent targets for vandalism, and I'm requesting this permission to help combat those issues wherever I find them. It should hopefully be clear from my recent editing history that I can tell the difference between a well-intentioned but misguided addition of content and an act of vandalism. I am happy to answer any questions you may have.

I ask for reviewer permission, having checked through the key competences listed. I have an account and I routinely edit, I have a reasonable editing history. Moreover, any I have sorted any disputes with other editors in a well-mannered way, and feel that more has to be done to encourage discussion and discourage dispute in the religious sector. I have read the Wikipedia policy on vandalism and I do understand what is and what is not vandalism. I have read, referred to and am familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I have read and am now familiar with the basic legal policy of Wikipedia:Copyrights. Imadjafar (talk) 09:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

 Not done – Per the message at the top of this page, WP:Pending Changes is being withdrawn. The Reviewer permission is now redundant. Sorry for the confusion. EdJohnston (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:ISponges

I want to be a reviewer because I have many edits. I aslo want to prevent vanalism from happening. iSponges just changed in Good Faith (talk) 01:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 Not done. Thank you for your interest. The pending changes trial is over, so reviewer status is not needed at present. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 02:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:KingRatedRIV

I have been a new page patroller and rollbacker for awhile and would like to have the reviewer rights so that I can handle vandalism, which is one of the main things I try to combat here on Wikipedia. I understand all of the rules and regulation in regards to being a reviewer and will not abuse this right. Thank you for reading my request. KingRatedRIV (talk) 16:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 Not done The end of the pending changes trial is supposed to be today. There's no current point in the reviewer being given. If it comes back again, ask then. Peridon (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Phanuruch8555

I started using wikipedia for 2 years ago and I have many experience here. Phanuruch8555 Talk Experiment lab 13:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 Not done - please read the notice directly above. Reviewer permissions are not currently being granted. Did you intend to request a different permission? Nikkimaria (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Declined/Archive_3&oldid=1190234665"