User talk:Goswamir14

Vanadalism on Click-to-call?

On my talk page you wrote:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Click-to-call. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. User:Goswamir14 and my talk - Always here to help! 19:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

I cannot see the revert of my edit, nor do I feel that my contribution was unconstructive. I repaired a dead link to Google help pages, as I had done on the corresponding German page. Maybe you mean the paragraph on patents which was inserted before my edit by IP 198.23.5.11, and which was yesterday removed by IP 198.164.227.131. --Gfis (talk) 13:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

RfC: New helper policy

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)

Vandalism of Sudarshan Chakra in "Astra"

The page "astra" contained description of Sudarshan chakra,and just like trishula,and a few personal weapons of the hindu trinity,the description used to read,"cannot be stopped by anyone",thus stating the infallibility of the weapon.In a way,this was just and logical as the personal weapons of the holy trinity operate their command only and cannot be used or stopped by the other two or anyone else for the matter,and it was the same for sudarshana chakara,trishula,pashupatastra.When I found recently,that the description on sudarshan chakra read "cannot be stopped by anyone else other than Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva",I felt the edit was sectarian,disruptive and also made the article unbalanced.So I edited that part referencing from wikipedia page "Ambarisha" which states both Lord Brahma and Lord Shiva were unable to stop sudarshana. 1.adamstraw99 (talk · contribs) has been continuously deleting that referenced part 2.he also edited the description from "thee most powerful weapon" to his opinion "one of the most powerful weapons" without citing any source,against wikipedia policy assert 3.He has also edited the page to describe trishul twice,specially once at the very beginning,for reasons unknown,which is also disruptive.please check [1] I have already tried Neutral point of view noticeboard,asked for page protection,but to no avail.I don't understand why such disruptive action is being allowed to continue.On a personal note,when I tried to contact this user on his talkpage,he resorted to personal attack and user space harassment,which I reported immediately.But no consensus can be reached with this guy.please advise.Ankisur2 (talk) 21:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

"Bobama" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bobama. Since you had some involvement with the Bobama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)