Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive5
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:46, 5 March 2011 [1].
List of Metallica concert tours (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive2
- Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive3
- Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive4
- Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive5
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Nergaal (talk) 23:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it passes the FL criteria. However, this is nomination #5 and I wonder if this is a dead horse...Nergaal (talk) 23:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the best format to use? I find List of Nine Inch Nails concert tours to be much more elegant.—indopug (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It is disappointing as an editor to get from reviewers comparisons of apples to oranges. That band does not have the same lineup between tours, and it went on tour 9 times; that list emphasizes that. Metallica has had very few member changes and a ton of different tours. Nergaal (talk) 07:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - By MusicMight.com About page it does not suggest to be reliable. Afro (Talk) 10:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose- I'm gonna oppose due to lack of activity, my comment doesn't seem to of been addressed in the last 2 weeks while the article has received no edits in the past 15 days. Afro (Talk) 20:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]- I've removed the MMight reference and replaced with better ones. Nergaal (talk) 01:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref 60's has an incorrect publisher it should be Boston Globe. I think most of the problems I've had were addressed in previous Nominations. Afro (Talk) 10:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed and added author. Nergaal (talk) 18:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I'll support I have no problems with the list. Afro (Talk) 10:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be willing to support if the above issue would actually be addressed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:15, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- PRovisional support. Just have one issues: Second sentence starts with "Asides from Ulrich"; it should be Aside. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 15:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 19:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*References comments
|
- Support now.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 19:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.