Wikipedia:Featured article review/2004 Atlantic hurricane season/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Joelr31 15:55, 31 January 2009 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- WikiProject, User:Cyrius, and User:Golbez notified.
The article was featured on October 15, 2006.
- The lead is too short.
- Most of the article is unsourced, including entire sections. The Records and notable events, in particular, sticks out, with unsoured numerical facts.
- The article lacks significant information; the Deaths and damage is only a few sentences long, even though the season was one of the most destructive in history.
- Many individual storm sections are not comprehensiveness.
- The article is sourced almost exclusively to the National Hurricane Center, with few secondary sources.
- Several references are not formatted properly.
–Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In regard to "sourced almost exclusively to the NHC", why is this a problem? --Golbez (talk) 01:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree there are too many problems for this to be featured. I personally think the article should be re-constructed along the lines of the other featured seasons from the time period (I am working on one such article now). ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please no, that format is awful. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 19:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concerns are lead, citations, and comprehensiveness. Joelito (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per above comments by Juliancolton (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 10:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove 1c YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 05:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.