Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/September 2023

Active Broadway theaters

There are 41 active Broadway theaters listed by The Broadway League in New York City. The definition of what constitutes a Broadway theater has changed multiple times; the current legal definition is based on a 1949 Actors' Equity agreement with smaller theaters in New York to allow union members to perform, dividing theater spaces in the city into the system of Broadway and Off-Broadway seen today. The general rule is that any venue that mostly hosts legitimate theater productions, is generally within Manhattan's Theater District, and has a capacity over 500 seats is considered a Broadway theater.

Active Broadway theaters

42 articles

Al Hirschfeld Theatre

Ambassador Theatre

American Airlines Theatre

August Wilson Theatre

Belasco Theatre

Bernard B. Jacobs Theatre

Booth Theatre

Broadhurst Theatre

Broadway Theatre

Circle in the Square Theatre

Ethel Barrymore Theatre

Eugene O'Neill Theatre

Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre

James Earl Jones Theatre

John Golden Theatre

Lena Horne Theatre

Longacre Theatre

Lunt-Fontanne Theatre

New Amsterdam Theatre

Palace Theatre

Richard Rodgers Theatre

Samuel J. Friedman Theatre

Shubert Theatre

St. James Theatre

Stephen Sondheim Theatre

Studio 54

Vivian Beaumont Theater

Walter Kerr Theatre

Winter Garden Theatre

Contributor(s): Epicgenius, Found5dollar

This proposed good topic encompasses all 41 active Broadway theaters, which host productions that can be nominated for the Tony Awards, as listed in the Internet Broadway Database and Playbill. Found5dollar improved List of Broadway theaters to FL status in 2020, and I decided to improve all articles on Broadway theaters to GA status between 2021 and 2022. Most of the articles on this list were promoted to GA status by late 2022, and New Amsterdam Theatre was promoted to FA earlier this year. With the recent promotion of Circle in the Square Theatre, all articles in this topic are now GA or higher. --Epicgenius (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Looks like a nightmare to maintain, but it seems well defined and complete for the moment. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support best-covered street on Wikipedia, I think. AryKun (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 05:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Active Broadway theaters}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift original studio albums

American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift has released 10 studio albums, starting with her self-titled debut in 2006. Fearless (2008) was certified Diamond in the U.S. and began her streak of consecutive U.S. number-one albums. Speak Now (2010) was her first in four consecutive albums that each sold over one million first-week copies in the U.S., including Red (2012)—her first U.K. number one, 1989 (2014), and Reputation (2017). Lover (2019) was Swift's first number one in several European countries, and Folklore and Evermore followed in 2020. Midnights (2022) made Swift the first artist to have the annual best-seller in the U.S. six times, after Fearless, 1989, Reputation, Lover, and Folklore.

Taylor Swift original studio albums

11 articles

Taylor Swift ^(subtopic)

Fearless

Speak Now

Red

1989 ^(subtopic)

Reputation

Lover

Folklore

Evermore

Midnights

Contributor(s): Ippantekina (formerly HĐ), Ronherry, TheSandDoctor, Ipodnano05

This topic includes all 10 studio albums by American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift, arguably the most important and best-selling songwriter of the current generation(s) say, Millennials and Gen Z. All articles have been improved to either Featured or Good status. --Ippantekina (talk) 04:54, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Looks complete and well-defined. Good work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 19:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Query - what about the three (soon to be four) "Taylor's version" albums? They may be re-recordings of old material but they are still studio albums so arguably fit within the scope of the topic..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the Taylor's Version albums I think they fit better in a subtopic for "Taylor Swift re-recorded albums" (which also includes the article Taylor Swift masters controversy) which is currently a potential topic being worked on at Wikipedia:WikiProject Taylor Swift. I think this split makes the respective topics more coherent in theme because although the re-recordings are technically also studio albums, they follow a different chronology and are generally regarded as a separate part of Swift's discography. Ippantekina (talk) 02:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's logical, in that case maybe the topic title should be "Taylor Swift original studio albums".....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did think of this option but it might be a little wordy.. Ippantekina (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support under the name "Taylor Swift original studio albums". It's a clear topic scope with an appropriate lead list. Re-recorded albums could be part of a separate topic with Taylor Swift masters controversy as the lead, or be merged with this into a broader "Taylor Swift albums" topic. — Bilorv (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and well noted the suggested name "Taylor Swift original studio albums". Ippantekina (talk) 03:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, meets the GT criteria. Brachy08 _(Talk) 02:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 05:01, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Taylor Swift original studio albums}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 03:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supplementary nominations

Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Taylor Swift original studio albums/addition1

Three Bards

The Three Bards are the national poets of Polish Romantic literature. Their tragic poetical plays and epic poetry, written in the aftermath of the 1830 Uprising against Russian rule, revolved around the Polish struggle for independence from the three occupying foreign empires.

4 articles

Contributor(s): Piotrus

All four articles now at GA. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~if we can get an image in place~~. Seems complete, with clear boundaries. Well done! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support AryKun (talk) 17:44, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Piotrus, two options for collages: File:The Three Bards (square).jpg or File:The Three Bards (horizontal).jpg. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MyCatIsAChonk Thank you! I prefer the horizontal one. What do others think? @Bryanrutherford0 @AryKun _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Horizontal. The square version gives the least important bard the most space. AryKun (talk) 12:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noted- added to box. And, support, very nice work on these articles. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 13:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 02:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Three Bards}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 03:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anomochilus

Anomochilidae is a family of snakes with one genus, Anomochilus, containing three species of snake. Members of the family are known as anomochilids, or by the common names dwarf pipesnake, lesser pipesnake, and giant blind snake. Dwarf pipesnakes are small and cylindrical, with short, conical tails and small, rounded heads that are continuous with the neck. They have blackish to purplish-brown uppersides and dark brown or black undersides, with orange-red bands around the tail and a variety of pale markings on the snout and belly. All three species of dwarf pipesnake are endemic to Sundaland, where they are found on the Malay Peninsula and the islands of Sumatra and Borneo. Adapted to living underground, dwarf pipesnakes inhabit leaf litter in lowland and montane rainforests at elevations of 220–1,513 m (722–4,964 ft). They are poorly studied and little is known about their diets and reproductive habits. They probably feed on earthworms, snakes, and legless lizards, and uniquely within their superfamily, lay eggs to give birth.

Anomochilus

4 articles

Anomochilus weberi

Anomochilus leonardi

Anomochilus monticola

Contributor(s): AryKun

Pretty straightforward genus topic, all of the species and the genus passed GA within the last month. --AryKun (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Seems comprehensive. Good work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 18:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Genus-topics like this are fairly simple as long as none of the species have subspecies with articles nor subpages. Since this genus lacks those complications, it is complete. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 02:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Anomochilus}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]