Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 22:07 on 24 November 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

[edit]
Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

[edit]

Errors in "Did you know ..."

[edit]
  • * ... that over the opening weekend of Florentina Holzinger's first opera, eighteen audience members required medical treatment for severe nausea?
    To my understanding, the normal meaning of Somewoman's Opera is that Somewoman composed that opera. There ist no indication in the article that she ever composed. How about some indication that she staged or directed Susanna, Hindemith's opera? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Referring to the source, she adapted Sancta from Hindemith's Sancta Susanna rather than staging it directly. It doesn't speak to the composition, but the reference to "naked nuns rollerskating on a movable half-pipe at the centre of the stage, a wall of crucified naked bodies and a lesbian priest saying mass" definitely sounds like some narrative modifications. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The possessive ("Somewoman's") is commonly used when talking about any person who had a major part in a creative work. The NYC Ballet is currently advertising "George Balanchine's The Nutcracker", even though Tschaikovsky wrote the music. This usage is also common when distinguishing between several people who have adapted a work, so "Ralph Bakshi's The Lord of the Rings" as opposed to "Peter Jackson's The Lord of the Rings". RoySmith (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I was on a bus for most of the day. I seem to need language education. For Nutcracker and Lord of the Ring, there's a famous title, but the hook has no title to credit Mr. Hindemith. "First opera" gives the impression of her creative work, but looking closer, it's rather some sort of adaptation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In his role as president of the Ukrainian Ice Hockey association. Zzzz. Secretlondon (talk) 16:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you read the article! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes to see how it was being misleading. Secretlondon (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think this is more misleading than quirky. The hook should say something like "in a previous position", or "had once". RoySmith (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, over half of his article is about his ice hockey career. Not only that, but the hook suggests that the program was successful, but only 12 rinks were completed within 5 years, so the program was a failure. I'd pull this. Black Kite (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I approved four other hooks on that page. Are any of those of any use?--Launchballer 19:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in "On this day"

[edit]
[edit]
(November 29)
(November 25, tomorrow)
[edit]

Any other Main Page errors

[edit]

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.