Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/February 2007/Sundaram7

Case Filed On: 08:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

• Sundaram7 (talk · contribs)

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

• India Rising (talk · contribs)
• Liyasag (talk · contribs)
• Soman (talk · contribs)
• Bakasuprman (talk · contribs)
• Mereda (talk · contribs)
• Sigma 7 (talk · contribs)

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

• National Development Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

• Answer: Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

• Answer: content dispute

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

• Answer: Discussion , informal mediation and kept silant for a while

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

• Answer: A non-biased neutral content on the article. Put a non-indian advocate to resolve this dispute.

Summary:

The content for National Development Front was originally posted by user:sm ashiq and then started editing by many contributors. The other party started attacking the article with their arguments and never come to a compromise to put a page with merged version. I have tried to bring a merged version many times, not very often, but the other party just tried with their arguments. The contributors mentioned above only put biased information without proper evidences.

There are posting in the discussion page to discuss the points before editing the page. But nobody cares about this info. The contributors just rv to their version and don’t put any explanation why he did it in the talk page or discussion page.

National Development Front is an organization of Kerala Muslim. But it is not a islamist / terrorist organizations like the ones which are black listed and banned in India, as the other side is arguing. There are statements from political party and other party leaders aqccsing NDF. I have tried to put the allegations and its courter arguments in the The accused NDF section.Users like Ganeshco (talk · contribs), Popularindia (talk · contribs), 220.225.195.26 (talk · contribs), Ndfindia (talk · contribs), Arenishr (talk · contribs) and Sm ashiq (talk · contribs) also support my views. But few other contributers have tries to put back their Allegations Only Version many times without any reason.

The other party has put allegations like NDF is a military and islamist organizations. They also accuse NDF for many illegal activities killings, robbery, attacks. These are the arguments that the enemies of NDF raises. NDF is against the human rights violations, fascism, and it criticizes government very often for unjust rules. So NDF has opposition and allegations from all these parties

I strongly suggest assigning a non-Indian advocate to resolve this dispute. If he is an Indian, he could be biased to NDF or the other party.

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

• Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

• Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

• Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

• Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

• Answer:

AMA Information

Case Status: open

Advocate Status:

• Geo. Talk to me 19:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)