Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2015/3

Stationery

Stationery – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 43 daily daily hits

It needs a good amount of expansion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 23:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Bananasoldier (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Who wants to vote for this article? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}} - Evad37 [talk] 01:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elmo

Elmo – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - From 300 to 900 daily hits

I searched for Elmo and expected a well-developed article but there is just not good development there. There is not even a picture of Elmo himself. Poor guy, like all other characters in Sesame Street have a picture. That sucks for him. Help the article? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - very bad development. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Badminton

Badminton – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 2742 daily hits

Needs improvement. For example, several sections are entirely unsourced. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I tend to enjoy the look of improved articles as majorly expanded articles. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Island

Island – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 1027 daily hits

Has significant potential for improvement and expansion. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Sure. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Technobabble

Technobabble – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 63 daily hits

Nominated by NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - it seems not well known and I never heard such weird stuff. I tend to enjoy seeing popular articles get expanded. Popular article and well-known subject expansion is what I like best. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if you don't understand my oppose comment, then ask me. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Not meaning to suggest anything but curiosity here, but I'm fairly surprised that you've never heard of this term or subject before. I've heard it referenced (at the least) many hundreds if not thousands of times over the last few decades -- usually with regard to sloppily-written fiction, but also in the vein of fringe science or academia and increasingly in more mundane/day-to-day technical circumstances. My concern is whether or not we can really expand the topic substantially. The articles seems to presently capture the meaning of the concept pretty well (and is decently written, in my opinion). Further, expanding it too far with specifics will, I fear, invite fans of particular sci-fi franchises to start loading it with all manner of fan cruft. Snow talk 05:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Which audiences would know such stuff? General audiences? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, I'd say general audiences are familiar with the phenomena to varying extents, though certainly it is a more pronounced phenomena in areas of speculative fiction (and science fiction in particular).

But with regard to sourcing, we might actually find more coverage of the topic in sources regarding psuedo-science and fringe (or just poorly approached) academia, where it has increasingly become a concern, and not just in highly technical fields -- in the last couple of decades some areas the social sciences have been noted for having become increasingly inundated with work that relies on highly insular and often borderline-indecipherable idiolects that attempt to up-jump pet theories (or the impression of empirical rigor) via the application of needlessly complex jargon. The cognitive scientist/popular science writer Steven Pinker has spoken on this topic at length (most notably in The Blank Slate and more recently in The Sense of Style), as have other academics. Mind you, this is a somewhat different animal from either a fiction writer using convenient language without having much understanding of the science upon which it refers, or a dubious application of scientific language that garners support amongst non-expert enthusiasts of some fringe theory, but the contexts are related and the term "technobabble" itself can be (and has been) applied to all three varieties of scenario.

Again, I don't know that I think the article requires a great deal of attention just now -- arguably the academic context could be explored in more detail, but that's going to require careful sourcing and wording to avoid WP:OR concerns. But just by way of answering your question, I think the term has a fair degree of recognition. Snow talk 08:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - you may support this article if you wanted to. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Audio editing software

Audio editing software – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

It is a stub and is not developed adequately. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support – plenty of opportunities for expansion here. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ; CSJJ104 (talk) 22:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vending machine

Vending machine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Needs a lot more improvement. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 13:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lunch

Lunch – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 400 to 500 daily hits

Needs more refs and has OR problems. very important subject with potential. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support, although I am not sure if this nomination is already on the Holding Area. I hope it is not already in the holding area. Good luck! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Religious philosophy

Religious philosophy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

A very minimal stub at this time. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - very true. Sounds important. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, quite strongly. It doesn't only sound important, it is important. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 21:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}} Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chick-fil-A same-sex marriage controversy

Chick-fil-A same-sex marriage controversy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, controversial subject, plus it looks well reffed and pretty informational to me. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 19:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I am not sure if this is suitable for me. And plus, this does not feel like something important. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{not approved}} 3 opposes equals no to this one. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firewood

Firewood – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 132 daily hits

Nominated by NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - of course, even though I have no knowledge of firewood. Yes, needs more citations too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hors d'oeuvre

Hors d'oeuvre – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Has significant potential for improvements and expansion. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. There is already an article called Hors d'oeuvre in the Holding area right now! Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crème brûlée

Crème brûlée – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 600 to 800 daily hits

Nice subject, needs expanding, notice that this is viewed more often than cheeseburger. (Keep in mind I may be biased, I make Crème brûlée every Thanksgiving) --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the high page hits. --31.48.13.115 (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christ the Redeemer selfie

Christ the Redeemer selfie – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~#Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Oppose, I don't think this is important enough to be a TAFI. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - however, we could do this outside of TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Nomination withdrawn. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coastal Corporation

Coastal Corporation – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved, no comments in over 3 weeks - Evad37 [talk] 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 5000 to 35000 daily hits

That article is about the franchise. If you look inside, a lot of things are missing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - if you don't believe me, check here.

Support. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - ranked 247th in Wikipedia traffic. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 23:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose too large for TAFI. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - wait, this is already improved by the writers of this ariticle. I had told them to improve it. Before, it was a major issue with the size; now it has expanded by over 18,000 bytes within a week and so it is already improved majorly. Just more pictures is necessary. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The article is improved enough to equal a TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. This article's underdevelopment has now been solved. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish cuisine

Turkish cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved, no comments in over 3 weeks - Evad37 [talk] 02:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of brand name snack foods

List of brand name snack foods – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Expandable article. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - better list and citations. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose General oppose including lists on TAFI. Specific oppose on grounds it will never be complete, and will only serve to increase WP:SysBias -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - do you think a strong oppose would equal 2 opposes? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not. One oppose is one oppose, regardless of adverb used. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. I withdraw this nomination. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Watercolor painting

Watercolor painting – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 511 daily hits

A (weakish) C-class level-4 vital article that would benefit from more sources, copy editing, expansion, organization and more. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - although the content is all right, the reference style needs total updating. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – fixing reference styles is out of scope of this project -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @CFCF: Fixing referencing styles is not out of scope. TAFI's scope is literally "improve articles to Good article, Featured article or Featured list quality" – all of which have standards for referencing - Evad37 [talk] 07:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well to rephrase it, I think we're going to get fewer volunteers when the work largely consists of checking old content instead of writing new content. I'm willing to support the entry if it can be shown or even suggested that the article can be improved in other ways. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 08:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. Not much support here, so I withdraw the nomination. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Brazilian drinks

List of Brazilian drinks – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Expandable article. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose General oppose including lists on TAFI. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. No support, withdraw nom. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huntington Park, California

Huntington Park, California – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too specific for TAFI. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not approved. I withdraw the nomination. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Report

Report – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Poorly written, and needing a huge amount and variety of different improvements. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --CSJJ104 (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{approved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chandelier

Chandelier – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 400 to 600 daily hits

Important subject, multiple problem tags. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I would say the definitions one is not looking as pretty as I expected. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artisan cheese

Artisan cheese – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Morzin Palace

Morzin Palace – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union

Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ornamental plant

Ornamental plant – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Floriculture

Floriculture – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - yes, and French Wikipedia has some useful information. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bioenergy

Bioenergy – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - it does need development. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, in need of improvement. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 02:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fan (person)

Fan (person) – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 448 daily hits

Plenty of potential and options for improvement. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Big potential. More interest, more citations, more expansion. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, big problems, big potential. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caramel

Caramel – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 300 to 600 daily hits

It's a shame such a tasty thing is start class and has ref problems. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - needs further work - 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeseburger

Cheeseburger – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 200 to 400 daily hits

I'm surprised this article is so small. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - very well-known. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I would agree. 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salzburger Nockerl

Salzburger Nockerl – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support, needs work. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okra soup

Okra soup – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Central European cuisine

Central European cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artisan

Artisan – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 689 daily hits

A comprehensive topic that does not presently have comprehensive coverage in the article. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 19:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Types of chocolate

Types of chocolate – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

This article has inadequate information about baking chocolate even though "baking chocolate" redirects there. Also, there needs more improvements. Comments if you can think of more improvements. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 06:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - there is just no information about baking chocolate and its uses. 115.188.176.132 (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - how to improve... Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Approved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caribbean natural region

Caribbean natural region – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Evad37 [talk] 01:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis the Wild Bull

Dennis the Wild Bull – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specialty foods

Specialty foods – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - special article needed Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 09:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Astroland

Astroland – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

Nom: NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unapproved}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Employment

Employment – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 25000 daily hits

There is only a sentence or two for each section, and a one-line lead. Given the prevalence of the topic in the real world, there really ought to be a decent article about it. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (chew) @ 21:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]