Jump to content

User talk:Zrcook610

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Zrcook610, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Zrcook610! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Zrcook610! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 09:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nfl high school

[edit]

Hello Zrcook610,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nfl high school for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —PC-XT+ 22:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —PC-XT+ 22:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Redrose64 (talk) 13:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Zrcook610/NFL High School 2014, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John from Idegon (talk) 03:08, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Duramax-drydene-400-dover-logo-625x340.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Duramax-drydene-400-dover-logo-625x340.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

[edit]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 January 29 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Duramax-drydene-400-dover-logo-625x340.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duramax-drydene-400-dover-logo-625x340.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Stock car racing wiki.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stock car racing wiki.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DoorDash 250 (Xfinity series) (December 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 07:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi. Before you continue making move requests or uploading files, can you please make sure you are versed in Wikipedia's policies on WP:Article titles and image use? I don't believe your edits fall in line with these policies. Additionally, please make sure you are making move requests properly, with a complete rationale as to why you think they should be moved. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 22:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Zacharycook597 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zacharycook597. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 17:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zrcook610 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I am sorry for abusing multiple accounts, making move requests and uploading images, I should have done a better job with going over the username policy document first, I understand now that the reason why the account is blocked is because reviving old unused accounts (sometimes referred to as sleepers) and presenting them as different users

Revi


Zrcook610 (talk) 16:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No chance of an unblock while you continue to evade your block. Your best bet is to go at least six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO with your original account. Yamla (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How does unblocking work?

[edit]

I will try not to give people reasons to object to my return and promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. Zrcook610 (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is thoroughly answered in WP:GAB and WP:SO. You've been abusive enough that you are almost banned, not just blocked. WP:UNBAN goes into more detail there, if you continue being abusive. WP:SO requires six months with zero edits. As you edited today (I'm literally responding to one of your edits), the soonest you could apply is 2023-06-27. Each time you evade your block or make another edit, though, the timer resets. --Yamla (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zrcook610 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock my Wikipedia account. I will stick to the Wikipedia policy and condition and will contribute to best of my knowledge. Zrcook610 (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zrcook610 (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you want to make this request? As you know, you are not eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO and this will mean that you aren't eligible until 2023-07-24. Furthermore, it may be seen as deliberately wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 23:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make a request Zrcook610 (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Well, you were warned. --Yamla (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Zrcook610 (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zrcook610 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was unaware of the rules regarding creating multiple Wikipedia accounts. I have familiarized myself with all these rules and will confidently follow them now. The reason I created a second account was to make it convenient for me to sign in to Wikipedia when using a different email in my web browser. Since there was no nefarious purpose for me in creating a new account, I request that this block be reversed. I had no intention of using a second account for any of the reasons listed under ‘Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts’ in the article on Sockpuppetry. My account is new and I was learning the basics of contributing to the encyclopedia. I request that my account be unblocked so I can continue to improve articles with unreliable sources, and promise to abide by all community rules if unblocked. Zrcook610 (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You may make this argument at the end of July. 331dot (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.