User talk:Zircon 2
Welcome!
|
Zircon 2, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Zircon 2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of White Zambians
[edit]
The article White Zambians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not justify its own article. No sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arfæst Ealdwrítere – talk! 21:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve White Tanzanians
[edit]Hi, I'm Ironholds. Zircon 2, thanks for creating White Tanzanians!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please address the tags on this article. Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 03:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Geology of the Central African Republic) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Geology of the Central African Republic, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add in-line citations, so it is apparent which statements are verified by which references. See WP:INLINECITE for more info.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
--Animalparty! (talk) 05:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Geology of Nebraska) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Geology of Nebraska, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Cool. Add a couple relevant images, and use more inline citations: complete paragraphs remain unattributed.
To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
--Animalparty! (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Geology of Rhode Island (October 24)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Geology of Rhode Island and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Ways to improve Prehistory of Newfoundland and Labrador
[edit]Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Zircon 2, thanks for creating Prehistory of Newfoundland and Labrador!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is an interesting-looking article, but you must support factual statements with inline references.It's not ok just to point to a book and say "thrre you are-go read it". At the very least you should add the relevant page numbers using the {{rp}} template. For such a detailed article I would hope to see four or five really good references to support this encyclooaedia entry.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Nick Moyes (talk) 07:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Prehistory of Quebec) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Prehistory of Quebec, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Semmendinger just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice looking page! I've added some updates, and tagged the page in hopes to get more than one reference for the entire article. Let me know if you need any help!
To reply, leave a comment on Semmendinger's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
SEMMENDINGER (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great job on your pre-history additions. Moxy (talk) 21:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC) |
A page you started (Geology of Lebanon) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Geology of Lebanon, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor TonyBallioni just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Great work! Some paragraphs still need citations, but on the whole it is a wonderful article.
To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
TonyBallioni (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Geology of Réunion) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Geology of Réunion, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please correct red link to Strombolian eruption, which I assume is what you meant?
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes (talk) 22:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Geology of the Democratic Republic of the Congo) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Geology of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This is another long article based on one source. It would be helpful, I feel, if in future articles you could add a page ref after each paragraph, rather than the end of a complex section.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Geology of Lesotho) has been reviewed!
[edit]{{subst:Reviewednote-NPF|1=Geology of Lesotho|2=Nick Moyes|3=Could you disambiguate amygdale? I've never heard it called [[amygdule], but apparently that's what Wikipedia likes to call them.}}
Nick Moyes (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Nice articles on the Geology of Africa
[edit]Hello Zircon 2, nice articles started, and good to see you're not afraid to include red links, too many other editors avoid them, but they are the backbone of Wikipedia. I added some images to some of your articles, please add some more to the other ones. You may have seen the request for the articles at the Portal:Prehistory of Africa where I added them and more articles that need to be filled, based on the amount of links to them (another good thing of having many red links). Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 02:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (List of stratigraphic units and structural features in Massachusetts) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating List of stratigraphic units and structural features in Massachusetts, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
There are far too many redlinks here for my liking, but I've seen some great work you've been doing, so hope you will be filling these missing articles in the near future.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes (talk) 00:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note - I would not worry about the redlinks, as they are potential article titles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Geology of Uganda) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Geology of Uganda, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Justlettersandnumbers just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice work, what a pleasure to see a real article instead of the usual trivia! I'm going to tag it as needing more sources, for the benefit of others who see it. If you'd like me to consolidate the various references to different pages of Schluter into one I can do so – drop a note here or on the talk-page there.
To reply, leave a comment on Justlettersandnumbers's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Geology of places
[edit]I appreciate your efforts writing all those regional geology articles. I have written a few myself so I can tell how much reading you may have to do to write them. One issue effects the lead. When you use the title "Geology of ..." you are talking about the scientific discipline of the study of the Earth in that area. However in the lead you are often using "geology" in a jargon alternate meaning that just refers to the rocks themselves. So I thnk that if you are going to say "geology of Kentucky" ... you should make the meaning of "geology" the same through the article, ie " geology of Kentucky is the study of ... which first formed in the Proterozoic". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (History of tariffs in Australia) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating History of tariffs in Australia, Zircon 2!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting article, but it needs more inline citations.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Zircon 2, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here. A few of your page creations have some issues with Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, though none of the articles I've at are so problematic to require that content be removed. If it's possible, you should try writing articles based on more than one source.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:14, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Zircon 2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hi Zircon 2! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Nomination of Geology of Socotra for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geology of Socotra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geology of Socotra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SharabSalam (talk) 19:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Geology of Rhode Island
[edit]
Hello, Zircon 2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geology of Rhode Island".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 04:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Geology Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Geology Barnstar | |
| Thanks for all the new orogeny articles! — Sagotreespirit (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geology of Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weston Observatory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Zircon 2
Thank you for creating Petermann orogeny.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice to see these new geology stubs. Ideally we would want at least two sources per stub, for verifiability purposes (WP:V). Also, adding the stub tag to each one that I have added to this one would be a good idea! Cheers and happy editing.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 19:48, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Zircon 2
Thank you for creating Glenburgh orogeny.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Also, after adding a second source, feel free to remove the maintenance template at the top of the page.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 19:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geology of Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
You added several references to
- Andreose & Renzi 2013
- Maenchen-Helfen 1973
- Kimura & Wilson 1983
- Holm 2013
- Merrill et al. 2010
- Kaufman & Justeson 2009
- Fowler 1985
- Willemyns 2013
- Pedersen 1996
- Fortson IV 2011
- Cline & León-Portilla 1984
- Greenberg 2004
- Schütz 1994
in that article, but without full citations it's impossible to know what these reference are. Could you add them please?
Also if you use User:Svick/HarvErrors.js, you'll be notified of these errors in the future. If you don't know how to install it let me know, I'll walk you through it. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Zircon 2
Thank you for creating Geology and geological history of California.
User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Surprised this article didn't exist before? Perhaps look around to see if there are any articles that could be merged into this one or the other way around. I couldn't find any myself.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Sam-2727 (talk) 22:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"White Tanzanians" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect White Tanzanians. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 24#White Tanzanians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Place Clichy (talk) 10:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of White Tanzanians for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Tanzanians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:58, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Geology of Panama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No necessity for a standalone article; it can be merged with the article "Geography of Panama" WP:MERGE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ItsCheck (talk) 07:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)