User talk:ZenCopian

Your creation of List of Richest Fictional Characters

A tag has been placed on List of Richest Fictional Characters, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rjd0060 17:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of most wealthy historical figures, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of most wealthy historical figures was changed by Jughead.z(1) (c) (t) deleting 13926 characters on 2007-08-27T17:51:07+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 21:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Charles_Tiffany.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charles_Tiffany.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 21:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Moses Taylor.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Moses Taylor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JimIrwin 12:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bill Melinda Foundation.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bill Melinda Foundation.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oyster guitarist 21:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed on your contribution log that you have uploaded many images of various people. I'm curious as to where you got these images from. Could you leave me a note on my talk page with more info? Thanks! —Remember the dot ^(talk) 03:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Hello.

I got most of these images by my paint of my Personal Computer, the source of their related photos have been found though internet searching, I however, the content of these images have been thoroughly checked for copyright address on them before being put though.

         Sincerely Jughead.z(1)

It is not necessary for a copyrighted image to contain an embedded copyright notice before it is protected by law, so if the absence of an embedded copyright notice was your criteria for use in Wikipedia, then your criteria is flawed. My understanding is that a creative work is automatically copyrighted (in the U.S. at least) the moment it is created. A copyright notice is usually helpful if the creator wants to sue over its use, but in principle the only thing the creator needs to demonstrate is that he or she actually did create the work, and that they never released it to the public domain. See Copyright - obtaining and enforcing

JimIrwin 16:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copyright violation

I deleted Image:Bernard Arnault 01331.jpg. You are most probably not the photographer, so you cannot legally put this image into the public domain.

For the umpteenth time: you cannot take photos from Internet searches (save in very specific cases) and put them on Wikipedia, this is simply gross copyright violation. David.Monniaux 08:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jack R. Lousma, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. There is no need to add "leap year" ages to persons born on Feb 29th. It is not a standard method of calculating age, nor would it be automatically updated by the age tag. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyrights

It looks like you could use some help with adding the correct copyright info to images that you upload. For instance, Image:Robert Todd Lincoln Beckwith.jpg is probably a free image from the US government, but it isn't something you created. If you would like help with your images, just reply here, right under my message, and I'll help you. - Peregrine Fisher 03:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BasilII small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BasilII small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BasilII small.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BasilII small.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Alain Le Roux small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alain Le Roux small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alain Le Roux small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alain Le Roux small.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:J.Paul_Getty.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:J.Paul_Getty.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 14:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Jack_C._Taylor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jack_C._Taylor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 02:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Massive copyright violations and false declarations

Copyright problems with Image:Amancio Ortega Gaona.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Amancio Ortega Gaona.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Paul Allen.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Paul Allen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Theo Albrecht.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Theo Albrecht.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:David Thomson31.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:David Thomson31.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Liliane Bettencourt.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Liliane Bettencourt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Yoshiaki Tsutsumi.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Yoshiaki Tsutsumi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Sam Walton2.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Sam Walton2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:David Packard.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:David Packard.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Lawrance Ellison.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Lawrance Ellison.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr..jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Richard DeVos.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Richard DeVos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Arthur V. Davis.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Arthur V. Davis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Sumner Redstone.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Sumner Redstone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Jay Van Andel.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Jay Van Andel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Samuel I. Newhouse, Jr..jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Samuel I. Newhouse, Jr..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Karl Albrecht Aldi.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Karl Albrecht Aldi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Jim C. Walton.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Jim C. Walton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Robson Walton.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Robson Walton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Alice Walton.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Alice Walton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Sheldon Adelson01.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Sheldon Adelson01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Stefan Persson.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Stefan Persson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Abigail Johnson.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Abigail Johnson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Suleyman Kerimov.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Suleyman Kerimov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Jack C. Taylor.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Jack C. Taylor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Vladimir Lisin.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Vladimir Lisin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Vladimir Potanin.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Vladimir Potanin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Oleg Deripaska.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Oleg Deripaska.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Mikhail Fridman.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Mikhail Fridman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:David H. Koch.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:David H. Koch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Nasser Al-Kharafi.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Nasser Al-Kharafi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Alexei Mordashov.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Alexei Mordashov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Viktor Vekselberg.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Viktor Vekselberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Charles Ergen.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Charles Ergen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Spiro Latsis.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Spiro Latsis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Michele Ferrero.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Michele Ferrero.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Christy Walton.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Christy Walton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Robert Todd Lincoln Beckwith.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Robert Todd Lincoln Beckwith.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dantadd 02:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Leonardo Del Vecchio.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Leonardo Del Vecchio.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dantadd 03:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Carl Celian Icahn.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Carl Celian Icahn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dantadd 03:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David Thomson31.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David Thomson31.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mars CandyLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mars CandyLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robson Walton.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robson Walton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sam Walton2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sam Walton2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:David Packard.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:David Packard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad fair use claim on an image of a living person

Fair use image problems

I notice you have uploaded the image Image:Paul Allen.jpg with the {{current tag name}} fair use image tag. However, this tag seems unrelated to the content of the image, and as a result it may qualify for speedy deletion. Image:Paul Allen.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why Image:Paul Allen.jpg can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the {{current tag name}} tag that you have placed on it with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it. However, you must not remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Miranda 09:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 12:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stefan Persson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stefan Persson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Image:François Pinault.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:François Pinault.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:François Pinault.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:François Pinault.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Sealand

I have noticed that you have edited the infobox for the Principality of Sealand (though it was changed back). This article needs to be improved, including the infobox. The reason it was changed back was because there is constant disagreement as to whether Sealand is a nation or not. I am trying to change the micronation infobox so that it is similar to the country infobox - that way this disagreement will be avoided. Is it possible for you to include the edits of your change to the infobox into the improvement, with sources - that way it won't be deleted. I think the country infobox is better, but at the moment there is a lot of disagreement. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You overstate the case, Onecanadasquarebishopsgate. Sealand is not a recognised country, and most of the fields in that template do not apply to tiny micronations (GDP, population, ethnic groups, etc). It's ridiculous. The article has to reflect published opinion.

You've now been reverted twice in this matter, Jughead; please do not add the country infobox back to that article as it may be considered vandalism and given your long history of warnings you may be blocked this time. --kingboyk (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I apologise if my tone was threatening. If you'd like to improve the micronations infobox feel free to edit it ({{Infobox Micronation}}) to make it more useful or better still, talk to Wikipedia:WikiProject Micronations about how it could be improved. The countries infobox certainly isn't appropriate for the Sealand article, however. Thanks again. --kingboyk (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wealthiest non-inflated historical figures

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wealthiest non-inflated historical figures, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Wealthiest non-inflated historical figures. Monkeytheboy (talk) 20:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robert Dollar.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert Dollar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WHF_logo_large.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WHF_logo_large.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research?

Quick question: are you making the inflation-adjsutment calculations behind the numbers in the articles Wealthy historical figures 2006, Wealthy historical figures 2007, and Wealthy historical figures 2008, and other similar articles? I checked the sources, and the numbers in the sources (and certain of the rankings in them) do not match the numbers in the articles. I am trying to track down the ultimate sources for the specific data in those WP articles; any light you can shed would be much appreciated. Thanks! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WHF logo large.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WHF logo large.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Weightman images

Hello, I see that you created Image:William Weightman 01.jpg, Image:William Weightman (manufacturer).jpg, and Image:William Weightman 01.jpg. To reduce confusion, we should have only have one copy (and you seem to be using Image:William Weightman (manufacturer).jpg) and it might be better to have it at Wikimedia Commons). Can you tell me which one you'd like to use and I'll delete the others. Also, if you are going to upload public domain images, I'd suggest doing it at Commons so that every wiki can use it if they want. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a virus or other concern. Having excess images is similar to having multiple copies of articles floating around. It can be confusing; it's better to have a single image to link to. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WHF logo large.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WHF logo large.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jedravent (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Academy Award Winning Film.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Academy Award Winning Film.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder that your're going to need to provide a fair-use rationale for every article you use the image in. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) ^{(talk / cont)} 19:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Academy award image in infobox

Have you discussed adding this image to film infoboxes on a talk page, particularly the talk page for the infobox template? If not, it can be challenged and the image can be removed. Infoboxes have parameters for what should be included, and right now there is no specification that such an image can be included in Template:Infobox_film. I don't recall seeing such an image for an award in an infobox for a film. Perhaps you have discussed this somewhere, but I would like to know that before you continue adding to every film that has won an Oscar. It could end up being a huge waste of time for you and whoever has to remove them. Please respond. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I think I understand why you are adding the image. My main concern is whether it is acceptable to the Wikipedia community. Infoboxes are usually crafted after some discussion (and sometimes disagreement and compromise) about what should be included. One editor taking it upon himself/herself to decide what goes in the infobox runs the risk of being rejected by other editors. And if enough people disagree, you've wasted a lot of time. And those of us who have to change all the articles back have more work to do. As an example, some people have added flag icons to dozens (perhaps hundreds) of bio articles. The Wikipedia community did not like that (see WP:FLAG for details), so they all had to be removed. It continues to happen.

I'm not saying that your insertion of the Oscar image will meet with disapproval. But I think you should raise the issue on Template talk:Infobox Film before you add to more film pages, then wait a while for responses to see what the general thinking is. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My concern isn't so much with the Infobox parameters, but its inclusion in it tilts it to an American-centric focus and copyright issues. This is ENGLISH WP, not American WP. I am removing the images since there isn't room for other awards such as BAFTAs and Golden Globes. I appreciate your interest in enhancing film article, but your history of copyright infringement cocncerns -- especially with images -- gives me pause, especially since legal use of this image is very much in question.
Jim Dunning | talk 23:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FUC rule #8 states that "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." The current interpretation of that rule is that fair use images cannot be used merely as decorative icons on infoboxes. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arguing that inclusion "would significantly increase readers' understanding" of the topic would be difficult since Academy Awards aren't that important, and awards can always be mentioned in the article body.
Jim Dunning | talk 23:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Academy Award Winning Film.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Academy Award Winning Film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Moon

Hello... just to let you know, the template Template:Infobox Moon that you created has been redirected to Template:Infobox Planet. You may not be aware of this, but there was a consensus last year to consolidate all such templates into one standardized form, with optional parameters for different applications. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about this. Thanks again. --Ckatz^chat _spy 20:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image use

Please stop putting fair use images back into Wealthiest families in history. Please read WP:NFCC and WP:NFC. This sort of use isn't permitted. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STOP reinstating fair use images onto lists such as Wealthiest families in history as you did here. If you continue to violate policy, you may be temporarily blocked from editing. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of fair use rationales for the images you are wanting to put on Wealthiest families in history. WP:NFCC #8 restricts usage of such images in the way you intend, and Wikipedia:NFC#Non-free_image_use_in_list_articles covers this in more detail. Do not reinstate these images again. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now requested semi protection of Wealthiest families in history, which will stop the IP based reversions of the fair use image removals. [1] --Hammersoft (talk) 22:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING: If you persist in placing copyrighted, fair use images onto articles as you did with this edit, this edit and this edit you WILL be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wealthiest families in history

Deleting this article seems inappropriate. It's a decent enough article. It needs more grounding in citations, but other than that I think it's ok. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wealthiest families in history

I have nominated Wealthiest families in history, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wealthiest families in history. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rodhullandemu (Talk) 22:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. The AfD process will last five days; if you can improve the article to meet policy in that time, that's fine. If it will take longer than that, I suggest you copy it to a subpage and work on it there. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Harkness Family logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harkness Family logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wealthiest families in history II

Please do not recreate this article. It has been deleted by a consensus at AfD, and therefore, unless the core concerns (OR) are addressed, it will not be recreated. seresin ( ¡? ) 02:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are we being unclear about something? Stop recreating this article. I've tagged it for speedy deletion again. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 02:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messaline

Thank You for correcting mistakes and expanding the article Messaline I've created. Keep up the good work! OpinionPerson (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Progenation machine.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Progenation machine.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Richard B. Mellon.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Richard B. Mellon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:George Fisher Baker.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:George Fisher Baker.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:HettyGreen2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:HettyGreen2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Cyrus Curtis.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Cyrus Curtis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:John W. Kluge.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:John W. Kluge.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Consolidated Virginia Mining Co..jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Consolidated Virginia Mining Co..jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Thomas Fortune Ryan.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas Fortune Ryan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:John T. Dorrance.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:John T. Dorrance.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:William H. Aspinwall.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:William H. Aspinwall.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Frasier Apartment Building exterior shot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Frasier Apartment Building exterior shot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Centibillionaire

I have nominated Centibillionaire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centibillionaire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 13:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of wealthiest historical figures

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of wealthiest historical figures. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wealthiest historical figures (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Russell Sage.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Russell Sage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:James C. Flood.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:James C. Flood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Anthony N. Brady.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Anthony N. Brady.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Oliver Hazard Payne.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Oliver Hazard Payne.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Powers & Weightman.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Powers & Weightman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:H. Hughes small.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:H. Hughes small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harkness family Coat of Arms.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harkness family Coat of Arms.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:WilliamofWarenne.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WilliamofWarenne.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZenCopian.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ZenCopian.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enblem of the United Kingdom of America.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Enblem of the United Kingdom of America.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oldest people in the world.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldest people in the world.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gulf Oil Corporation Small.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gulf Oil Corporation Small.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Listofsuperpowers.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Listofsuperpowers.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:William Weightman.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:William Weightman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Daniel Willis James.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daniel Willis James.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Elias Hasket Derby.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elias Hasket Derby.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wealthy Historical PhotoCaption.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wealthy Historical PhotoCaption.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:James J. Stillman.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James J. Stillman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 23:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allen Small.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Allen Small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lincoln family tree.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lincoln family tree.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lincoln Isham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lincoln Isham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincoln Isham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Lincoln Beckwith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Lincoln Beckwith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Lincoln Beckwith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr..jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr..jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timothy Lincoln Beckwith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Lincoln Beckwith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Lincoln Beckwith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 10:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Charles Tiffany.jpg

The file File:Charles Tiffany.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Tiffany.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charles Tiffany.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jessie Harlan Lincoln.jpg

The file File:Jessie Harlan Lincoln.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lincoln Isham.jpg

The file File:Lincoln Isham.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WCWhitney small.jpg

The file File:WCWhitney small.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your creation of List of Richest Fictional Characters

August 2007

Unspecified source for Image:Charles_Tiffany.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:Moses Taylor.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Bill Melinda Foundation.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Bill Melinda Foundation.jpg

Images

Photos

Probable copyright violation

October 2007

Image copyrights

Image tagging for Image:BasilII small.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BasilII small.jpg)

Image tagging for Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg

Image tagging for Image:Alain Le Roux small.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alain Le Roux small.jpg

Unspecified source for Image:J.Paul_Getty.jpg

Unspecified source for Image:Jack_C._Taylor.jpg

Massive copyright violations and false declarations

Copyright problems with Image:Amancio Ortega Gaona.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Paul Allen.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Theo Albrecht.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:David Thomson31.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Liliane Bettencourt.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Yoshiaki Tsutsumi.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Sam Walton2.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:David Packard.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Lawrance Ellison.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr..jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Richard DeVos.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Arthur V. Davis.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Sumner Redstone.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Jay Van Andel.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Samuel I. Newhouse, Jr..jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Karl Albrecht Aldi.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Jim C. Walton.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Robson Walton.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Alice Walton.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Sheldon Adelson01.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Stefan Persson.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Abigail Johnson.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Suleyman Kerimov.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Jack C. Taylor.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Vladimir Lisin.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Vladimir Potanin.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Oleg Deripaska.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Mikhail Fridman.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:David H. Koch.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Nasser Al-Kharafi.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Alexei Mordashov.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Viktor Vekselberg.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Charles Ergen.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Spiro Latsis.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Michele Ferrero.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Christy Walton.jpg

Copyright problems with Image:Robert Todd Lincoln Beckwith.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Leonardo Del Vecchio.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Carl Celian Icahn.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CleopatraVII portrait small.jpg)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David Thomson31.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mars CandyLogo.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robson Walton.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sam Walton2.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:David Packard.jpg)

Bad fair use claim on an image of a living person

Fair use image problems

November 2007

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stefan Persson.jpg

Copyright violation in Image:François Pinault.jpg

Principality of Sealand

Wealthiest non-inflated historical figures

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Marcus Licinius Crassus02201.jpg)

{{Mining stub}}

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Robert Dollar.jpg)

Image:WHF_logo_large.jpg listed for deletion

Original Research?

Fair use rationale for Image:WHF logo large.jpg

William Weightman images