User talk:Monkeytheboy

Thanks and Happy New Year

Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.

Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.

Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be great to have your feedback/comments and participation in the recently-set-up Tag & Assess workshop The idea is to see what lessons we can learn from the 2007 drive to make the 2008 one more efficient and enjoyable.

Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 10:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield

I've tagged the above for a speedy delete as its a direct copy of the church's own website history page. Paste (talk) 18:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, all the best. Paste (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1996 in Australian television

Hi, I've removed the speedy deletion tag from 1996 in Australian television as I don't consider it to be a speedy deletion candidate – the article does contain some meaningful content, and although it lacks an introductory paragraph, the context can be inferred from the navbox and title. --Canley (talk) 02:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, put them up for AfD if you feel the articles are not suitable. --Canley (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Years in Australian Television

Hi. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality and helping to keep the place picked up. :) I've deleted a number of the articles on years in Australian t.v. as lacking content when they contained only the template. When they contain more than the template, they do not really fit into any of the speedy criteria. "No context" is for articles that leave you scratching your head, unable to make out what they're talking about. "No content" is for articles consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, chat-like comments, and/or images. Lists do not violate Wikipedia's policies, per se. See Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) for more on how & when they are appropriate. If you think that these articles are inappropriate per that guideline, then you have the option to nominate them for deletion by one of the other processes, WP:PROD or WP:AfD. I've added a couple of tags to the specific article you noted, since it lacks sourcing and categories. As to the notability, lists can be contentious and confusing. I find AfD discussion about them somewhat unpredictable and can call to mind quickly the example of List of Indian women, which was deleted, and List of Iranian women, which was not, even though the articles were nearly identical in construction and were nominated within days of each other. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teacher and the Rockbots

Please note that this and The Blankies were both created by an SPA/role account which has the name of the company/label which issues these records. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, you're not the COI editor! These articles were created by Powerarts, which by no coincidence whatsoever is the name of the company involved. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsweek Wrong?

I think you should cite it with an external link. Signed, Nothing 444 22:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to Yahoo! itself, Newsweek was right: See here. But in any case the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is not truth but verifiability. —teb728 t c 22:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ATB Addicted to Music.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ATB Addicted to Music.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ATB No Silence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ATB No Silence.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...

Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 13:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One Stripe (200 articles)
Two Stripes (400 articles)
Three Stripes (600 articles)
Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles)
Chevrons (2000 articles)
Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles)
Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles)
Third place overall
Second place overall
First place overall

Hello Again

Can you please review this RFC and make comment. There is a campaign to harass me from editing, and I believe my edits are being mis-represented. If you have a moment, can you please have a look.

Thank-you. Wageslave (talk) 00:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Batter

Google search has some ghits [1]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not creator of the article. I only asked you as I found some ghits. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--O sama K 15:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Question on Referencing from the help desk

Essentially, Associated Content was blacklisted because it offers financial incentive to its authors for increasing page-views (which would be spam) and it's content was unreliable to begin with. See: this link for more detail. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 21:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maryline Blackburn

Hi. I saw your comments at Talk:Maryline Blackburn. The place to give your input is at the deletion discussion:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryline Blackburn

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ed Waugh and Trevor Wood

I think that Ed Waugh and Trevor Wood is notable. I have seen a good deal of references for it. However, it definitely needs improvement to make it more neutral. I don't think that it should be deleted, but it does need some work. I hope that my opinion helped. :) Captain panda 20:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Barrio fino en directo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Barrio fino en directo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What breed is Bolt?

Hey there. I had to look up exactly what an Indian Spitz is, and while I admit that the Bolt character certainly could be one (both in look and in demeanor), there's still a citation problem. If you can provide verifiable proof that the artists who produced Bolt based him on an Indian Spitz, then it no longer is trivia; instead, it would belong in the article's "character design" section. The "holy grail" piece of proof would be an interview with the artists saying that they chose the Indian Spitz as the basis for Bolt because of its bonding with humans, which, as you probably know, is a key component to Bolt's story. This could be in a newspaper article, or even in the audio commentary on the DVD/BD. I'll listen to the commentary on my BD copy, and if I find it, I'll add it and find a way to cite it.

I'm not disagreeing with you; in fact, you've got me curious to see if that's what Disney actually did. That said, let's not add that back until we can find something that says that's what Bolt is. If you have any problems, ask on my talk page and I'll help however I can. Thanks!

McDoobAU93 (talk) 22:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at some of the other cited sources in the Bolt article, and ran across one that says that Bolt is an American White Shepherd. While there could be something to that, at the same time I'm still wondering if Bolt really is an Indian Spitz ... what makes me think about that is Bolt's size. A full-grown shepherd is a pretty large dog, and even a 5-year-old Bolt (as suggested in the opening sequences) is relatively small. The White Shepherd article was edited to mention that Bolt is one, but it too is uncited. Again, I'm for leaving things as they are until we get a better source (again, preferably from the artists themselves). Thanks for your help! --McDoobAU93 (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Indian Spitz is not an AKC-recognized breed, so they wouldn't have any information on them to provide to Disney. For what it's worth, the American White Shepherd isn't listed with AKC, either. Most likely, Bolt is just a nondescript white dog, not meant to be any particular breed. Although, I do admit his design and character traits do match up well to the Indian Spitz ... I may try another couple of approaches to see what I can find out. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:ATB-Two Worlds.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ATB-Two Worlds.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Carlos & Alejandra. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 06:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dollastx.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dollastx.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American music task force

Hello Monkeytheboy! I've noticed your work article related to Latin American music. I would like to invite you to the Latin American music task force a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain Latin American music-related articles. If you'd like to join, please sign up here. Thank you. Erick (talk) 21:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indianspitz.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indianspitz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:M Solveig Hedonist Album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:M Solveig Hedonist Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for participating in Translating Ibero-America!

	Thank you so much for participating in Translating Ibero-American!
	From Wikimedia Argentina we would like to thank you for participating in the contest Translating Ibero-America ¡We hope to see you soon in our next contest!

--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Monkeytheboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translating Ibero-America is back! Come and join us :)

Dear Monkeytheboy ,
Hope this message finds you well!
Again this year 2017 the Iberocoop network is launching the editing contest "Translating Ibero-American" aiming to position the Ibero-american culture outside our borders :)
You can find the contest page here
We hope you can join us!
Hugs--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help verify translations of articles from Spanish

Hello Monkeytheboy,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Spanish to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Spanish article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Spanish, using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Spanish. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Spanish article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elinruby (talk • contribs) 07:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Monkeytheboy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Monkeytheboy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]