User talk:Zeitergeist1997

Zeitergeist1997, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Zeitergeist1997! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm IndianBio. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lady Gaga discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lady Gaga discography, you may be blocked from editing. You know very well that adding false certifications is a big no-no. Either stop such edits else face a block from admins —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kesha discography page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Lady Gaga discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blakegripling ph. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Barbie Horse Adventures: Riding Camp because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Blake Gripling (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nicki Minaj discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Peaks must be sourced before Billboard updates. Ss112 01:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shallow (A Star Is Born). —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:29, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Far too many of your edits have been reverted for lack of sourcing despite numerous warnings. As far as I can tell you haven't responded to any of them. When your block expires I strongly advise you to edit with great care. If this continues you are likely going to end up being indefinitely blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Loyola basketball

Do you mind explaining why you reverted my constructive edit? Everything you undid was very good work. You removed dashes, attendances, and added back in perimeters that are unneeded. So why? There was no reason at all for my edit to be undone. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lady Gaga discography. If I see you adding one more unsourced content and factually inaccurate content when source has not updated, the next block will be for longer duration. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 17:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]