User talk:Zafariqbalofficial

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I’m reaching out with a humble request to reconsider the block on my account. I’ve taken time to reflect deeply on the reasons behind it and understand that my actions [briefly describe the general nature of the issue, if it was related to content disputes, not following guidelines, etc.] may have fallen short of the community’s standards.

I love contributing to Wikipedia, and the thought that my actions might have disrupted the very platform I respect pains me. I’ve spent these past months reviewing the guidelines and thinking about how I can better align my contributions with the community’s expectations.

I am genuinely sorry for any trouble I’ve caused and am eager to make amends. I promise to approach my future contributions with greater care and to seek guidance whenever I’m unsure about Wikipedia’s best practices.

I value being part of this community and would be truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute again. I am open to feedback and willing to engage in any discussions or steps necessary to regain your trust.

Thank you for considering my request. I am hopeful for a chance to be part of Wikipedia’s mission once again.

Sincerely,

Zafariqbalofficial

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zafariqbalofficial/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Zafariqbalofficial! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zafariqbalofficial/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I’m reaching out with a humble request to reconsider the block on my account. I’ve taken time to reflect deeply on the reasons behind it and understand that my actions [briefly describe the general nature of the issue, if it was related to content disputes, not following guidelines, etc.] may have fallen short of the community’s standards.

I love contributing to Wikipedia, and the thought that my actions might have disrupted the very platform I respect pains me. I’ve spent these past months reviewing the guidelines and thinking about how I can better align my contributions with the community’s expectations.

I am genuinely sorry for any trouble I’ve caused and am eager to make amends. I promise to approach my future contributions with greater care and to seek guidance whenever I’m unsure about Wikipedia’s best practices.

I value being part of this community and would be truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute again. I am open to feedback and willing to engage in any discussions or steps necessary to regain your trust.

Thank you for considering my request. I am hopeful for a chance to be part of Wikipedia’s mission once again.

Sincerely,

Zafariqbalofficial Zafariqbalofficial (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Zafariqbalofficial/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Zafariqbalofficial/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I’m reaching out with a humble request to reconsider the block on my account. I’ve taken time to reflect deeply on the reasons behind it and understand that my actions [briefly describe the general nature of the issue, if it was related to content disputes, not following guidelines, etc.] may have fallen short of the community’s standards.

I love contributing to Wikipedia, and the thought that my actions might have disrupted the very platform I respect pains me. I’ve spent these past months reviewing the guidelines and thinking about how I can better align my contributions with the community’s expectations.

I am genuinely sorry for any trouble I’ve caused and am eager to make amends. I promise to approach my future contributions with greater care and to seek guidance whenever I’m unsure about Wikipedia’s best practices.

I value being part of this community and would be truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute again. I am open to feedback and willing to engage in any discussions or steps necessary to regain your trust.

Thank you for considering my request. I am hopeful for a chance to be part of Wikipedia’s mission once again.

Sincerely,

Zafariqbalofficial Zafariqbalofficial (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Zafariqbalofficial, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Akram808 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zafariqbalofficial. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Iqbal Group of Companies, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:IQBAL GROUP OF COMPANIES

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IQBAL GROUP OF COMPANIES, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 17:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iqbal Group of Companies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iqbal Group of Companies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 17:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iqbal Group of Companies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iqbal Group of Companies, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 19:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Unblock me please I'm not new Here I'm old editer Zafariqbalofficial (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

@Spicy: I think there is more here than spam links. . . . The WP:ARTSPAM and use of multiple accounts.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I’m reaching out with a humble request to reconsider the block on my account. I’ve taken time to reflect deeply on the reasons behind it and understand that my actions [briefly describe the general nature of the issue, if it was related to content disputes, not following guidelines, etc.] may have fallen short of the community’s standards.

I love contributing to Wikipedia, and the thought that my actions might have disrupted the very platform I respect pains me. I’ve spent these past months reviewing the guidelines and thinking about how I can better align my contributions with the community’s expectations.

I am genuinely sorry for any trouble I’ve caused and am eager to make amends. I promise to approach my future contributions with greater care and to seek guidance whenever I’m unsure about Wikipedia’s best practices.

I value being part of this community and would be truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute again. I am open to feedback and willing to engage in any discussions or steps necessary to regain your trust.

Thank you for considering my request. I am hopeful for a chance to be part of Wikipedia’s mission once again.

Sincerely,

Zafariqbalofficial Zafariqbalofficial (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

UTRS appeals

UTRS appeal #82151 is closed.

Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

this is my first article and 2nd account not my this is my brother account Akram808

Please understand I'm old uesr of Wikipedia and first mistake I will never do again this mistake please unblock my account Zafariqbalofficial (talk) 21:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #85512 has been closed, with the following closing message: "As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. I also advise you that is unlikely that any administrator will even read any unblock request like this one, let alone accept it. An unblock request needs to give the impression of having been written by a human being who understands the reason for the block." JBW (talk) 17:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Community,

I’m reaching out with a humble request to reconsider the block on my account. I’ve taken time to reflect deeply on the reasons behind it and understand that my actions [briefly describe the general nature of the issue, if it was related to content disputes, not following guidelines, etc.] may have fallen short of the community’s standards.

I love contributing to Wikipedia, and the thought that my actions might have disrupted the very platform I respect pains me. I’ve spent these past months reviewing the guidelines and thinking about how I can better align my contributions with the community’s expectations.

I am genuinely sorry for any trouble I’ve caused and am eager to make amends. I promise to approach my future contributions with greater care and to seek guidance whenever I’m unsure about Wikipedia’s best practices.

I value being part of this community and would be truly grateful for the opportunity to contribute again. I am open to feedback and willing to engage in any discussions or steps necessary to regain your trust.

Thank you for considering my request. I am hopeful for a chance to be part of Wikipedia’s mission once again.

Sincerely,

Zafariqbalofficial Zafariqbalofficial (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)