User talk:Youssefa82718

May 2024

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Takbir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christianity in Egypt seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christianity in Egypt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christianity in Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Christianity in Egypt. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that it was vandalism, but it was a disruptive edit: it misused the lead section of the article, and it editorialized on the basis of biased sources. Please desist from this sort of editing and better familiarize yourself with our policy and guidelines regarding sources and neutrality. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Christians use the Arabic word الرب during religious prayers and rarely use the word Allah. I don’t know why you keep banning me for no reason? Youssefa82718 (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Takbir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. M.Bitton (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your stance, but having a 2019 estimates isn’t the right thing. I was being as neutral as possible and even mentioned the fact the Coptic Church figures might be inflated for political reasons in the demographics section.

And regarding the lead section, can you explain to me what I did wrong? I made sure to keep all the templates previously available.

Thanks again Youssefa82718 (talk) 14:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with the lead section is that you ignored the structure of the existing article in your changes. Please see WP:LEAD--the lead should be a summary of the rest of the article, not a place to introduce novel editorialization. The additional text included concessions and caveats, but overall served to editorialize in favor of Pope Tawadros's views over those of cited RS. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Coptic Orthodox Church—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Youssefa82718, can you please explain why you made the above identified edit? You appear to be directly contradicting what RS say about this topic. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Coptic Orthodox Church, you may be blocked from editing. You have persistently removed referenced content, altered content to inaccurately reflect references, and added unreferenced or poorly referenced content. Further behavior of this sort will likely result in an indefinite block. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to  Christianity in Egypt seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 11:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Youssefa82718. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 08:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prayers with Heretics of Christianity

Hello, Youssefa82718. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prayers with Heretics of Christianity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]