User talk:Yousou

Archives

Proposed deletion of Line Communications

The article Line Communications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost even speedy material and I would tag as such but I'm not sure if it will be removed so PROD instead...my searches found nothing at all to suggest better improvement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Just wanted to thank you for adding an assessment to those baseball stat list pages my dude. I tried to submit a lot of them a while ago, but the assessment page was dead at the time, so I appreciate you doing it. Taffe316 (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's got to make a judgement, I don't think mine's perfect but it'll do. The userbot per the tables is still not working though, so the progress made is not shown. Yousou (Complain) 00:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WikiProject Baseball

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WikiProject Baseball, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Sorry about that! You got to it while I was worrying about the history. I certainly did not mean to revert you! I've requested revdel btw as I think it steers close to the wind legally. Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries I understood after I did the reversion that you meant to revert someone else and not me, I have also requested protection of the page due to the issues relating to the closure news, you can also +1 the protection request if you desire. The decrease arrow was a nice nifty version of disruption, I will admit. Yousou (Complain) 19:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haha thanks! Someone really really doesn't like that company! However, it was apparently not a legal concern so my revdel request was refused. I'm just having a lovely successful evening all round, really! Cheers and sorry again DBaK (talk) 19:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like multiple people given that the news has hit the Twitter outrage circles, as is what drew me to the fact that the article was vandalised and people were celebrating such on Twitter. It's usually shouldn't be a legal concern especially if we revert it as quickly as we did. The outrage stems from the perception it related to the unionisation of the newspaper earlier that year, which adds to the Twitter drama. Glad to know you're doing well, cheers. Yousou (Complain) 19:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yousou. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logos in navbox headers.

Please do not replace the text in navbox headers with corporate logos. This is against our MOS. Navboxes are for navigation, not to be part of the corporate image of a company. --wooden superman 08:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Antandrus

It's a WMF-banned user who has been harassing Antandrus (and Jimmy Wales) for years. Please don't give them the air time. I've blocked the account without email access. Acroterion (talk) 00:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]