User talk:Mujtaba!

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mujtaba!. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Happy Squirrel (talk) 00:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Warning regarding the Teahouse

A week ago, I left you the following message: "It is nice of you to try to answer questions at the Teahouse, and your efforts are appreciated. However, I suggest that you limit yourself to those questions where you can give an accurate answer written in standard English. I wish you well."

You acknowledged my message yet in recent hours, you provided a Teahouse answer that was confusing and not written in competent English.

Please stop. You do not want to be restricted from editing at the Teahouse for disruptive behavior, do you? Wait until your English and your understanding of Wikipedia are much better. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have added yourself as a Teahouse host here [1] can I politely suggest that you have nowhere near enough experience to be helping others here. Theroadislong (talk) 10:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an explanation that I provided to you at the Teahouse and am saving here because it will soon be archived out of the Teahouse. Please read it and limit your posts at the Teahouse so that you won't be either blocked or topic-banned from the Teahouse: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ATeahouse%2FQuestions&type=revision&diff=720874115&oldid=720871061 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert McClenon (talk • contribs) 14:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)‎[reply]

Lede sections

I reverted your edit here [2] on the British Cypriots article, the lede section doesn't always require citations as it is summarising the body of the article where the content IS referenced. Theroadislong (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again, here (at Hebrew alphabet). --bonadea contributions talk 15:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Somalia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Adding that kind of content is not remotely appropriate or encyclopedic. And why on earth do you add unsourced text and stick a "citation needed" tag on it? If you cannot source it, don't add it. (But that particular addition would be reverted even if you sourced it because it is trivia unrelated to the article's subject). bonadea contributions talk 14:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tea house. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of E/16

The article E/16 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. According to Islamabad#Civic administration there are numerous sectors. Why is this one notable?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Biddulph (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David BiddulphMr, please read cityscape section carefully , you may find statement like this: "from E/6 TO E/17." And E/16 also included in this, for more discussion please discuss at talk page of E/16.--Yes ji (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of E/16 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E/16 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E/16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 07:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Safdar Awan

Hello, Yes Ji. You seem to have created this page on its own, but I'm not sure why. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, please use the whole of the Articles for deletion process, which will create such a page, but give it appropriate content. I have tagged the page you created for speedy deletion. --ColinFine (talk) 09:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: 🍵 is a poorly supported Unicode symbol U+1F375 "TEACUP WITHOUT HANDLE".[3] I agree it shouldn't be used due to bad browser support (I don't see the symbol in Firefox) but it looks like good faith. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PrimeHunter, Yes it,s a good faith, but if i made mistake, then really sorry.💐Yes ji (talk) 13:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm-- 🍁 Mujtaba 🌴 14:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Code Brew Labs, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Neither this draft nor the one in draft space shows corporate notability. Please do not create multiple copies of drafts on the same topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ellenfan/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mujtaba ji, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well-- 🍁 Mujtaba 🌴 04:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SineBot

The reason why SineBot is signing your comments (as it did here) is because your signature is pointing to your old userpage, User:Yes ji. To prevent this, please update your signature in your preferences and change the link to point to User:Mujtaba!. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:K6ka, Done , Thanks.-- 🍁 Mujtaba 🌴 13:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed

I see that you recently asked at the tea house about extended confirmed. Since that time, you have been adding whitespace to articles: [4], [5], [6], [7], etc. While this will rapidly bring you to 500 edits, it can also cause people to accuse you of gaming the system. Basically, what this means is that before we allow you to edit certain controversial articles, we expect you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and community standards. This is why those articles require 500 edits. Adding blank lines and spaces to articles does not demonstrate anything except a desire to edit controversial articles, and that can backfire on you. So, I would suggest that you work on improving articles rather than simply adding blank lines. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just went to see his contributions. Are you just trying to increase your number of edits from your sandbox? - INVISIBLE^knock! 07:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

I have reverted your edit to Epoch (astronomy); please see WP:NOTSEEALSO. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop adding random line breaks to articles (e.g. [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] from today alone). It has no effect on how the articles display, and clogs editors' watchlists and the articles' edit histories. If you do have a legitimate reason for making edits like this, please use edit summaries to explain why you're making the edits. ‑ Iridescent 16:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iridescent, this explains why. Mujtaba!, you've been asked to stop repeating different disruptive actions since you started editing here. There's a point beyond which patience runs dry and you are close to that. —SpacemanSpiff 03:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He has retired and wont bring u any respons --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice ooocorn (popcorn)

	Ooocorn (Popcorn)
	Here is some ooocorn (popcorn) for you! Be joyful! CasetteTapeMaster (talk) 02:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]