User talk:YellowFratello

Saint-Pôtan

Thanks for the picture! — M-le-mot-dit (T) 10:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Wessely

Well done for your expansion of that article, which I've not touched for a while because of certain elements. Could I suggest that you get rid of all inline cites (using external links in the text)? Rather, it might be better to turn them into proper references. Let me know if you need a hand with that. JFW | T@lk 20:10, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Ashton.

Hello. In an attempt to achieve agreement to remove the Neutrality tag from the Assessments section of this article, I have edited down what some have seen as the undue weight of laudatory comment in this section, and am now requesting feedback at the article's Talk page. I am contacting you in view of your past work on this article. Nandt1 (talk) 09:54, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thank you! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:46, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

You are too kind, and I too undeserving - thanks very much. :-)

Happy editing, and keep up the good work! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello YellowFratello, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing,
Rosiestep (talk) 01:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Georges Méliès

Hello! Since you're a member of the French Cinema task force, I thought you might be interested in joining a discussion about Georges Méliès and how best to cover his pioneering films on Wikipedia. I've started the discussion here: Talk:Georges Méliès filmography#What about the redlinks?

I'd greatly appreciate your thoughts and advice!--Lemuellio (talk) 23:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just back from Tinseltown and catching up with messages - will be happy to help. YellowFratello (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have contributed - thanks for asking.YellowFratello (talk) 11:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chaplin

		The Wikimedia UK Barnstar
		This is to say thanks on behalf of the UK chapter for your work on the recent Chaplin editathon at the cinema Museum.
		_{this WikiAward was given to YellowFratello by Jonathan Cardy (WMUK) (talk) on 13:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC) for contributions to the UK chapter}[reply]

My pleasure - I am up for it again when needed. YellowFratello (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Now what would be our next theme/anniversary? I don't suppose they have a big collection of Chinese material by any chance? Jonathan Cardy (WMUK) (talk) 12:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask - they have many things. World War One dominates all in terms of centenaries at the moment but we are 100 years away from the establishment of big time Hollywood. "On March 14, 1915, Laemmle opened the world's largest motion picture production facility, Universal City Studios, on a 230-acre (0.9-km²) converted farm just over the Cahuenga Pass from Hollywood. Studio " for example YellowFratello (talk) 09:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolas Philibert

Hi. Everything you add must be sourced to a WP:BLP article. Please read WP:BLPREMOVE. If you continue to add unsourced info into a BLP article, you risk being blocked. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:58, 21 March 2015 (UTC);;I will go on nd add the necessary references. Please show some patience with other users. YellowFratello (talk) 12:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, you show some patience with long-standing established policy. Quite frankly, what you've written is shit. You should NEVER add anything to a BLP (or anything else for that matter) without sourcing it first. This is your only warning, you'll will face a blocking next time. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lugnuts. I have taken a while to consider my reply to this. In the meantime I have added reference etc to this page. I do hope you consider the content of your reply. Had I not been a fairly self-confident person with many years of editing behind me then I might have been really upset. Talking to admin friends they too worry that such emails would put off new or less experienced editors. (Personally I believe the use of words like 'shit' is not really appropriate in dialogue with a stranger on a wiki.) We really need to encourage people who make edits, even if we feel they have made mistakes rather than flying at them. I hope you take this in the reconciliatory way it is meant. Regards and happy editing YellowFratello (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is Thanksgiving in the US, so thank you!

I am just a regular editor and nothing official like an administrator or Wikimedia contractor...I am an editor probably a lot like yourself. One important thing for me is to express thanks to other editors in a personal message to their talk page. This is not a template. I am just leaving this note for you to express my appreciation for your recent participation in voting for Arbatration Committee Members. Your vote is a great thing and with as many people participating as possible there is an excellent chance that we will have good representation on this committee. The Very Best of Regards,

Bfpage |leave a message 16:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	For regularly adding great snippets of information about cinema, across English Wikipedia. I hope you keep up the great work, and am excited to see you continue to build you confidence around editing! Sadads (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sadads - great to be thanked and the first five years are the hardest! YellowFratello (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Celador

Regarding Celador and cellar door: the reason for not putting the Donnie Darko snippet in the Celador article is that it's no more relevant to Celador than any of the other examples on the cellar door page. The production company existed first, and nobody's ever suggested that it was the inspiration for the phrase appearing in Donnie Darko, they just both happened to refer to the same pre-existing phrase. If you put the Donnie Darko fact in the Celador article, then you may as well put any random fact from the cellar door article on that page. Which you don't do, because the article is about Celador, and the other stuff, including the bit about Donnie Darko, isn't. In a nutshell. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Totally fair point! Thanks YellowFratello (talk) 10:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This Sunday

Hi, just in case you haven't picked this up from the watchlist notice, we are meeting in the Oak this Sunday. Be nice to see you again. Ϣere SpielChequers 11:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Had not and must come along - when is the September one? This Sunday hosting up to 35 relatives to celebrate work of an American uncle renowned for his work on Anthrax. Please don't ask... YellowFratello (talk) 16:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alice Diop) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Alice Diop, YellowFratello!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

May I suggest you create a separate 'Awards' section. This helps users assess her WP:NOTABILITY more easily. You need to learn how to create links to foreign wikipedia articles. I've edited one ofthese for you, but you should not use them as references.e.g. Aulnay-sous-Bois should just be a wikilink. (see this help page. Please confirm that biographical statements about her early life are fully supported by reliable sources, removing any that are not. See WP:BLP for help on biographis of living people.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nick - really important to get help like this especially when filmmakers like this, though prize winners at festivals and in their own country get too little coverage. Have broken it up as suggested, added some more citations and, yes, the sources check out. YellowFratello (talk) 13:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, YellowFratello. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leapfrog Press Global Fiction Contest Prize

The article Leapfrog Press Global Fiction Contest Prize has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

$150 prize - zero in-depth coverage in searches, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote it in a neutral way as I have always done as an experienced editor - I am not a part of the prize and have never applied for it but it is a gateway for a lot of minority authors as can bee seen by the link. They will not be J K Rowling rich or get the publicity of the Booker but it has been a footstep to being published - the prize money is irrelevant it is about access to and has proved itself the quality of the judges is high. YellowFratello (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leapfrog Press Global Fiction Contest Prize for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leapfrog Press Global Fiction Contest Prize is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leapfrog Press Global Fiction Contest Prize until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carducci String Quartet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carducci String Quartet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://carducciquartet.com/about/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenny Imafidon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenny Imafidon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenny Imafidon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 14:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomiwa Owolade moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tomiwa Owolade. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - am away from my desk for the moment - will give the article some attention next week to get it into shape.YellowFratello (talk) 08:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added several more sources and really cannot understand why this was moved to draft rather than being given a chance to improve. This author is already a significant voice in British journalism and people need a reliable Wikipedia page to be able to know who he is. Can you p=have a look please. YellowFratello (talk) 07:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yellow Fratello I fixed some issues with this Owolade piece and submitted it. Then it was turned down again. This bothers me because of the obvious race issues. Wikipedia is not helping itself here. NoorStores (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think we should escalate this? YellowFratello (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you know who we can escalate to? There are very many people here with big enormous unconscious bias problems! I cannot see the problem with the article now can you? Inshallah you are not offended by my tidying up!!

I do not wish to be terminated as I have an interview next week. The notice on the Talk page of the person who knocked back the article said he had terminated 3000 users or something like this!! NoorStores (talk) 17:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3017 users. He is from Alabama and in favour of carrying guns. He thinks a BBC Radio 4 Documentary is a Radio Show fluff! NoorStores (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it is published now - am I right? YellowFratello (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tomiwa Owolade has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tomiwa Owolade. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed YellowFratello (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomiwa Owolade (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomiwa Owolade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, YellowFratello! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomiwa Owolade (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Oltrepier were:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm sorry, but you haven't made significant progress since the last review: the first sentences are still excessively sourced, whereas other statements don't even have a single citation. Plus, I'd argue that "This is Not America" might need a separate Wiki-article, since I don't think this is the right place to address the critical reception of the book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomiwa Owolade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Added five external sources from reliable external sources. YellowFratello (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Oltrepier (talk) 15:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomiwa Owolade (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable,

Added five external sources from reliable external sources. YellowFratello (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these sources are written by the subject. Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Added five external sources from reliable external sources. YellowFratello (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomiwa Owolade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomiwa Owolade (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The vast majority of these sources are to his own work, we require independent sources with significant coverage about him NOT by him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomiwa Owolade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guy is a prolific writer and journalist published in all the quality UK press plus with a book that has passed muster with critics. The citations are largely of his work but they are published in places of real repute, the places we rely on for citations.. Others like me will want to know more about him and that is why we need a page about him.

I could just remove all the citations that start with his name but that would not help those looking for his work.

I see many other pages about writers that are similar and think this needs to be reconsidered. He has an established position at UCL, a book and is constantly published in the UK quality press. YellowFratello (talk) 09:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working away like mad and now I am allowed to put up articles on my own! Do not have to send for review! What would happen if I put up the Owolade article? Would you mind? We can continue waiting no problem!! Noor NoorStores (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, YellowFratello. Thank you for your work on Jim Pines. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksYellowFratello (talk) 08:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yep - published! A very kind lady, PamD, helped out and gave Dmires a nudge. Super happy about this. Noor NoorStores (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent Barnstar to her for being sensible. Nice to work with you Noor.YellowFratello (talk) 18:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you too! Solidarity! NoorStores (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

help...

YellowFratello I could use some support over at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#c-Chris_troutman-20240112171100-NoorStores-20240112141400 NoorStores (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to bring some sense. Fingers crossed. Hang in there. YellowFratello (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks bro. This place is harder than they can ever understand. NoorStores (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Baylen Leonard

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Baylen Leonard, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]