User talk:Yaminmohsin

This is Yaminmohsin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sikander Mohsin (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sikander Mohsin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sikander Mohsin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yaminmohsin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saba Karim (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Could be notable, but the sources are a mix of passing (or no) mentions, the subject commenting on something, and primary sources, none of which contributes towards notability per WP:GNG. Some information is not properly supported, eg. which reliable, published source gives the details in the 'Early life and education' section, or the DOB?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saba Karim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Yaminmohsin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Saba Karim, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saba Karim (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs significant coverage in independent and reliable sources to show that he is notable. Interviews, autobiographies, and articles written by him/companies he works with are not independent; if he is only given one passing mention, or the article is about his company, with only a brief mention of him, it is not significant coverage; and most blog posts are not reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saba Karim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 00:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saba Karim (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No better sources have been added since previous comment.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saba Karim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Saba Karim

Hi Yaminmohsin, I saw that you asked for more advice on your draft. Really the crucial part here is finding more reliable sources. The kind of classic examples of these would be books and newspaper articles, but those aren't the only possibilities; a group that only publishes online can also be fine. The key qualities for a source are that they have a reputation for fact-checking (so something like a personal blog usually wouldn't be a great source), and they're independent of the article (so something written by Karim or a company he works for usually wouldn't be a great source, although those kinds of sources can be okay for uncontroversial pieces of information or what a person/group says about him/itself).

There is a lot of overlap between what we consider to be a good source and what shows notability, but notability had a few additional criteria, the two biggest probably being that the source must have significant coverage of whoever the article's about (a passing mention in one or two sentences may be fine to source a claim, but it doesn't show notability), and also that independence is considered more strongly: I mentioned earlier that primary sources can be used for some uncontroversial information or what a person says about himself, but that source wouldn't show notability; interviews are generally also not considered independent.

With all that said, I haven't looked for this particular individual, but I can't say for sure whether that level of sourcing exists for him or not - it's certainly possible that it does, but there are many people who don't have that much written about them. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me any time. LittlePuppers (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for this my friend, really appreciate your assistance and explanation on this whole topic, It has helped me understand the whole picture now. I will keep this in mind, I can see that with present sources of this entity it is not possible yet to successfully publish it live. I will pause this until I find more resources and move on to my next project.

Thanks. Yaminmohsin (talk) 11:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Saba Karim, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Yaminmohsin, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yaminmohsin|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your amazing moderation and assistance,

I am not related or connected to them by any means and not doing it as paid. Although I have known this entity through social media, this article has no connection with myself or financial benefit. I do understand the strict policies of Wikipedia, and I appreciate the platform for the same. I have chosen a few people whose Wikipedia doesn't exist and am planning to work on them successfully. I hope to present them in the future once published unconditionally. If, in case, I do any paid edits in the future or of someone whom I know, I shall disclose my COI. Yaminmohsin (talk) 11:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saba Karim

Hello, Yaminmohsin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Saba Karim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]