Jump to content

User talk:Xi'anlo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2023

[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to History of gravitational theory, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are merging it into pre Newton ideas of gravity to Newton's idea of gravity and secondly we removed the bhasaracharya quotation because it was already debunked by A user named David Wilson in 2016 in the talk page of bogus quotation of bhasaracharya Xi'anlo (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at History of gravitational theory, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Wikipedia:NOTVAND. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Mako001

[edit]
Hello, Xi'anlo. You have new messages at Obiwana's talk page.
Message added 15:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 15:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Obiwana per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Obiwana. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 17:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]