User talk:Xhfgsepfiuh

Move provocations

Unilaterally moving a page name to one that endorses fringe theories about historical figures linked to nationalist disputes (in this case Serbian-Albanian) and operating an SPA account mainly active in talkpage arguments relating to claiming historical heroes of neighboring nations belong to your ethnicity are... a good way to get yourself sanctioned. Happy constructive editing. ---- Calthinus (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unilaterally moving a page name to one that endorses fringe theories about historical figures...
— User:Calthinus 00:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I haven't made any one-sided moves of the article but responded on the initiative of another user who expressed his concerns over the current title of the article.[1] You should also keep in mind that I've waited for a response of other editors for almost two months since my first edit on 8 May 2018.[2] Your groundless implications are false. I'd also prefer if you could elaborate your disagreements with the topic first before outright rejecting other peoples stances simply because you dislike or disagree with their opinions. Denigrating labels like "fringe theories" are excessive baggage and unnecessary to the discourse of the topic.

...and operating an SPA account mainly active in talkpage arguments...
— User:Calthinus 00:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I do not operate any SPA account; my IP address is publicly visible and verifiable. I am a newly registered account, and I am entitled to edit whatever topic I am pleased to and whenever I want to without any restrictions, as long as I am following the standard Wikipedia procedures.

... a good way to get yourself sanctioned.
— User:Calthinus 00:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikihounding and threats are against the Wikipedia:Harassment policy. I will leave you three more days out of courtesy and good faith to provide an adequate explanation of the subjects name recorded in the contemporaneous sources of time, and why the article's title should remain Gjon Kastrioti, after which I will undo reverts that were done by you and the username Ktrimi991 unless I receive a satisfying argumentation instead. Should you choose to proceed with vandalising behaviour on this article, then I shall be obliged to seek assistance from the Arbitrary Committee.

Happy constructive editing.
— User:Calthinus 00:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I am looking forward to quality parlour myself as well. Xhfgsepfiuh (talk) 11:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria makes great music. I'm a fan of chalga. Tell me, are you?---- Calthinus (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I hope you are, dear AMES, because it is time for you to [face the music] at your Sockpuppet Investigation linked to the left. The WP:GAME is [over] :) ---- Calthinus (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A question

In your edit here you added as a source this book. Since the book has 644 pages and the name Kastriot(i) is not to be found in the index, it would be helpful if you could point to which page in the book is relevant for this article. Thank you! --T*U (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page 88, second paragraph, which I clearly displayed in one of my edits.[3] Xhfgsepfiuh (talk) 05:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Don't sock, AMES. Investigation here [[4]] ---- Calthinus (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not possess any sockpuppet accounts. As already said, this is my sole username. Xhfgsepfiuh (talk) 05:45, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool story. Come clean and confess. You know you should. ---- Calthinus (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Aleksandër I Madh Është Shqipëtar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xhfgsepfiuh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How about someone tries the CheckUser? I am not the same persona as that Alexander guy. Xhfgsepfiuh (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser cannot prove a negative. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The same person is quite capable of using different computers-- the behavioral evidence was damning enough.Calthinus (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

uninvolved editor comment: Having read the SPI, I agree that you are a sockpuppet of AMES. Lavalizard101 (talk) 16:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gjon Kastrioti move request

You previously participated in discussions of the title of the Gjon Kastrioti article. The issue is again under discussion here if you care to participate. — AjaxSmack 17:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]