Jump to content

User talk:X12visuals

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph James Nantomah (December 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 11:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, X12visuals! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 11:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph James Nantomah (December 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph James Nantomah (December 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Seems to be an article built entirely on PR fluff. You need much better citations to WP:RS to demonstrate WP:N
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tagishsimon (talk) 22:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph James Nantomah (December 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
DGG ( talk ) 10:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete paid editing notice

[edit]

Hi there, I appreciate that on your talk page you have disclosed your paid relationship(s), however, you did not indicate the clients. The text currently reads "that they have been paid by Joseph James Nantomah on behalf of Name of your client, if different from your employer". In both templates you were supposed to indicate clients. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So how can i correct that. ThanksX12visuals (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC) I have updated the Name of client. ThanksX12visuals (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

will this improve chances of the article to be approvedX12visuals (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Only properly establishing that the subject is notable will improve those chances. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph James Nantomah(2) (February 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Carpenter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Paul ❬talk❭ 09:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Okwilague Shamac Ibrahim

[edit]

Information icon Hello, X12visuals. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Okwilague Shamac Ibrahim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prosperity for Africa foundation (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Prosperity for Africa foundation instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:26, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, i have also worked on improving the articles has requested by you, also how do i delete the draft, thanksX12visuals (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph James Nantomah(2) (April 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Curbon7 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Curbon7 (talk) 23:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Okwilague Shamac Ibrahim

[edit]

Hello, X12visuals. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Okwilague Shamac Ibrahim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph James Nantomah

[edit]

Hello, X12visuals. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph James Nantomah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DafriBank

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DafriBank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♟♙ (talk) 20:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prosperity for Africa

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prosperity for Africa, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bbb23 (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Prosperity for Africa

[edit]

Your article is now in draft space where you can work on bringing it up to standard before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 07:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DafriBank (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Princess of Ara were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Princess of Ara 08:13, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DafriBank (September 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 19:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obinna Iyiegbu moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Obinna Iyiegbu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 02:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DafriBank (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
S0091 (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Obinna Iyiegbu (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

X12visuals (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

I WAS BLOCKED BECAUSED I USED A USER NAME THAT LOOKS LIKE A COMPANY BUT IT WASNT INTENTIONAL AS ALL THE NAMES I INTENDING USING WHERE REJECTED AND I HAVE CHANGED TO A MORE PERSONAL NAME, HOPING I WILL BE RECONSIDER. THANKS X12visuals (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

[edit]

While you have disclosed on your userpage that you are being paid by two individuals to edit Wikipedia, you have not identified which articles you are being paid to create or edit. Please clarify if you are being paid to edit Draft:Prosperity for Africa Foundation, and which individuals are paying for your work. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DafriBank

[edit]

Information icon Hello, X12visuals. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DafriBank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prosperity for Africa Foundation

[edit]

Information icon Hello, X12visuals. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prosperity for Africa Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Obinna Iyiegbu

[edit]

Information icon Hello, X12visuals. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Obinna Iyiegbu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DafriBank

[edit]

Hello, X12visuals. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DafriBank".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prosperity for Africa Foundation

[edit]

Hello, X12visuals. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prosperity for Africa Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Obinna Iyiegbu

[edit]

Hello, X12visuals. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Obinna Iyiegbu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:X12visuals&oldid=1112558784"