User talk:WuTang94/Archive 3

An archive of selected messages from 2021-22.--WuTang94 (talk) 21:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of quarterbacks of non-white and non-black descent or ancestry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of quarterbacks of non-white and non-black descent or ancestry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of quarterbacks of non-white and non-black descent or ancestry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:Namiba 17:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Allen (DC Extended Universe) has been accepted

Barry Allen (DC Extended Universe), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 05:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Characters of the DC Extended Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Planet Express employees

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Planet Express employees, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DC Extended Charaters drafts.

I see that in most of your draft about the DC Extended Universe characters are unfinished. What I'm worried is that you haven’t finished them in 3 months. I managed to made some changes with the infoboxes, but I would really like to see these draft as articles because they are worth of it, but I'm no the one who should finish them. I just want to remind you about these drafts: Draft:Billy Batson (DC Extended Universe), Draft:Lex Luthor (DC Extended Universe), Draft:Amanda Waller (DC Extended Universe), Draft:General Zod (DC Extended Universe), Draft:Steve Trevor (DC Extended Universe) and Draft:Steppenwolf (DC Extended Universe). Ulises1126 (talk) 6:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Ulises1126 you are welcome to assist on those drafts as well! I can't write all these drafts by myself and they are meant to be worked on collaboratively. Just make sure they have a decent number of reliable sources and real-world notability before publishing them as articles. --WuTang94 (talk) 15:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Sennecaster. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Zack Snyder seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sennecaster (What now?) 14:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sennecaster, thank you for your concerns. I can see how the later of the two edits may be perceived as non-neutral and I apologize for the poor choice of words I made there, so I won't contest the reverting of that edit. However, I am puzzled how the other one was not neutral. Perhaps I could have omitted some of the words I chose, but I am fairly certain that was a non-biased source that described Snyder's directing style more in depth. Either way, I'm willing to work with you on making sure that meets criteria. --WuTang94 (talk) 16:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm a pending changes reviewer (PCR) and I really don't have an interest in the article itself. I think this would be better if you take this to the talk page for invested editors with more of a background and understanding of the topic to assess. I can answer why I may have reverted a "good" edit (and parts of it did seem neutral!) FlaggedRevs, the tool PCR uses, doesn't allow us to differentiate too easily between which revisions are good and which are bad, and accepts/reverts get weird if the bad revision comes before the good revision. The NPOV violations outweighed the non-NPOV violations so I wholesale reverted in that instance. Feel free to restore the actual neutral content in that case. I hope this explained my actions :) Sennecaster (What now?) 16:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sennecaster appreciate the quick follow up! Sometimes even a seasoned editor like me can get out of wack, so it's good that people like you can keep me in check. --WuTang94 (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malik Evans has been accepted

Malik Evans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding ZSJL and progress to GA article

Hello WuTang94! I am Dcdiehardfan, and you may know me from ZSJL. I am currently trying to get the article on GA, and I think we are on track to that. I appreciate your contributions to the article and was wondering how much of the article we fixed so far (per the GA review) and I was also wondering if we can work together to make it a GA. Happy editing and thank you! Dcdiehardfan (talk) 04:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dcdiehardfan, you're welcome for the help! I've been doing what I could recently, though I'll be on and off Wikipedia these next few days. As long as we hit the checkmarks from that one reviewer, Zack Snyder's Justice League should reach GA status. I'll try to help whenever I can. Keep up the good work! --WuTang94 (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steppenwolf (DC Extended Universe) has been accepted

Steppenwolf (DC Extended Universe), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Will Reeve has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Will Reeve. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 17:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, Fade258. I replaced that IMDb source with another one that seems to backup his birthdate and filmography. Let me know if anything else needs to change for that draft to be approved. --WuTang94 (talk) 00:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2021 Tampa Bay Buccaneers–New England Patriots game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Tampa Bay Buccaneers–New England Patriots game, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Tampa Bay Buccaneers–New England Patriots game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Buffalo Bills season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Taylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for inputs

Greetings,

Came across your contribution @ the article SEPTA regarding October 13 incident which has been deleted after a short talk page discussion. During some other talk page discussions I came across similar questions about article Vs. relevance of crime to the given article. One user positioned problem statement as ""Which objective criteria to establish relevance can be devised?" I came up with some encyclopedic tools (Since one of the discussion still under way I can't give ref to that discussion to avoid charge of forum shopping) But I have copy pasted my opinion in my user sandbox and looking for and requesting inputs.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bookku, thanks for the heads up. I took a look at the SEPTA talk page and it seems logical why they'd take it out from a transit agency's Wiki page, especially if they seem to be citing that no SEPTA employee was responsible for the attack or the delayed time to report it (and I also realize that having this incident in the SEPTA page would be pushing the boundaries against WP:NOTNEWS). Maybe I'd check to see if it fits on Wikipedia as an example of groupthink or herd mentality, or if this incident is notable enough to merit its own page as a crime incident. --~~ WuTang94 (talk) 17:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied over content about the October 2021 incident into Draft:October 2021 sexual assault on SEPTA train. I'll work on it a bit more until it's ready to be published. You are more than welcome to assist in editing. --WuTang94 (talk) 06:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WuTang94. You have new messages at Mlaffs's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Octavius (Sam Raimi film series) (December 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The comment left by Slywriter was: As previously stated by other reviewers, wikipedia does not need articles for every iteration of a fictional character

Slywriter (talk) 22:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WuTang94! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 22:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Reeve (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Reeve and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Will Reeve, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude

^talk 09:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Steve Trevor (DC Extended Universe)

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steve Trevor (DC Extended Universe), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you note

Hi WuTang94, thanks for additional clarification on the Gwen Stacy article. Because I briefly edited the footnotes for Harry Osborn and also looked at Mary Jane Watson, I did not give a full explanation therefore some of my edits were reverted. Am still learning to edit Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.111.165.22 (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Fisher

Hi there. I've reverted this edit because we can't simply rely on Rotten Tomatoes and disregard how other high-quality sources describe critics' consensuses, violating WP:DUE. Please be more careful of this next time. Cheers! KyleJoan^talk 07:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Joan: fair enough, but as far as I know, the Snyder Cut has received mostly positive reviews. If I find another source that backs this up aside from RT, would that be okay? --WuTang94 (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you're able to demonstrate that "positive" is due and "mixed" is undue, then yes. I must say, though, I researched this extensively and found "mixed" to be due. The LA Times, TotalFilm, Collider, The Mary Sue, Syfy Wire, and Metacritic all indicate reviews were mixed. In addition to the positive Rotten Tomatoes score, Screen Crush says reviews were overwhelmingly positive, while Screen Rant and Forbes say they were decent, which slightly leans positive at best. KyleJoan^talk 17:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After looking through that source from LA Times and the actual article for ZSJL, I simply changed the wording in Fisher's article to "most critics considered it an improvement over the theatrical cut" per ZSJL's page. That way I think we can find middle ground between the "good" and "mixed" arguments and reduce the chance of edit wars. --WuTang94 (talk) 18:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not what that material is supposed to signify. While the detailed analyses on what critics thought are relevant to the film's article, it's not relevant to Fisher. Readers simply need a general consensus. Pardon me if this sounds harsh, but the middle ground you speak of sounds like your way of injecting your personal positive viewpoint of the film. KyleJoan^talk 18:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add: CNET says mixed, while ComicBook.com says both mixed and decent. All things considered, excluding "mixed", a due term, in favor of an ambiguous deduction that does not describe Zack Snyder's Justice League as its own piece is not helpful. KyleJoan^talk 18:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree with your sentiment. In no way trying to enforce my personal views; I may have a preference in how I edit, as do you, but am doing my best to keep the tone of this page neutral. I was simply going off what was agreed upon in the prose for the reception section of Zack Snyder's Justice League, which was edited by several other editors.

To avoid conflict from brewing on Ray Fisher's page, I think the article should focus on Fisher's performance itself, not the film's overall reception. Removing an extraneous tidbit of information that better belongs on another page, even if Wikipedia is not censored, is not necessarily "pushing one's narrative". Readers can go to the main page for the film if they want to get critics' opinions on the film as a whole and let this page focus on Fisher, not the film. But of course, I'd rather open this to discussion with other users to solve this amicably and avoid escalating into a heated argument.

--WuTang94 (talk) 19:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of articles

Hello, WuTang. I do agree with the idea of developing superheroes as human beings first and as, well, superheroes later because it enhances audiences' ability to relate to them. However, I believe that using that argument to refer to the characters by their secret identities rather than their code-names would be the same as seeing these characters from an in-universe perspective. Last time I checked, Wikipedia encouraged editors to write things from an out-of-universe persective because these articles are for general audiences rather than hardcore fans that want to learn absolute everything from their favorite franchises. This isn't the DC Database, where articles are written from the perspective of someone who lives in the DC Universe.

Well, at least that's how I see things. I look forward to your response. Leader Vladimir (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vlad,

Appreciate the response. I guess the practice of naming film versions of superheroes started with articles on Marvel Cinematic Universe characters and I just followed suit with other character pages I created, such as DCEU Superman (and all the other ones), Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man and others. I really don't have a strong preference unless there are multiple characters who take up the mantle of a superhero (MCU Steve Rogers and Sam Wilson both become Captain America, for example), but I'm just voting to keep the Superman articles as-is for the sake of consistency. If you change one, you'll probably have to change all of them. That's where I was coming from. --WuTang94 (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

new draft page

can you create a new draft page title Draft:Spider-Man (Takuya Yamashiro) please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackknight1234567890 (talk • contribs) 2022-02-17 (UTC)

@Blackknight1234567890: I do not know anything about that character. You can start that draft yourself if you have the time!--WuTang94 (talk) 16:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

page need to help

can you edit Draft:Bruce Wayne (Arkham series character) please?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackknight1234567890 (talk • contribs) 2022-02-18 (UTC)

Once again, please stop hounding me and other users to write articles for you, especially on versions of characters I am not familiar with. You can ask me to review an article to spellcheck, but unless I am familiar with a character, I won't contribute much to their page.--WuTang94 (talk) 17:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some copy edit help

Greetings,

I am looking for some copy edit help in the article Draft:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault if possible.

Thanks

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mr. Peanutbutter.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mr. Peanutbutter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Carolyn.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Carolyn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Todd Chavez.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Todd Chavez.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diane Nguyen BoJack.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diane Nguyen BoJack.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Terrence Building

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terrence Building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Billy Batson (DC Extended Universe)

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Billy Batson (DC Extended Universe), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Faora-Ul

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Faora-Ul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Faora-Ul

Hello, WuTang94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Faora-Ul".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Downtown Buffalo

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Downtown Buffalo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rochester Psychiatric Center

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rochester Psychiatric Center, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Allen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Will Reeve

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Will Reeve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hail Murray GA?

I'm starting a project to bring all of the NFL Play of the Year Award winners that have pages to GA status. When looking at the Hail Murray article I saw that the article is already in GA shape thanks to your contributions. I was wondering if you want to nominate the article to receive the GA credit for it? Newtothisedit (talk) 03:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll consider it, thanks. Sorry I've been kinda busy lately WuTang94 (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Will Reeve

Hello, WuTang94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Will Reeve".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clark Kent (Arrowverse)

Hello, WuTang94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clark Kent (Arrowverse), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Punt Game

Greetings. I was just trying to figure out why No Punt Game has a See also link to 2018 Kansas City Chiefs–Los Angeles Rams game? I don't see the connection. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 01:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I included a link there as these games were very similar to each other, in that they were high scoring, featured teams considered to be Super Bowl favorites, and were both considered some of the "greatest" NFL games by analysts in retrospect. You can go through those sources to double check, but I won't make a fuss if you remove the link. WuTang94 (talk) 01:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

InfiniteNexus (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas, WuTang94! Have a prosperous new year! InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:57, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]