User talk:Wrongobject

AfD nomination of The Wrong Object

I have nominated The Wrong Object, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wrong Object. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 21:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wrongobject. Concerning your contribution, The Wrong Object, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wrongobject.com/homepage.php. As a copyright violation, The Wrong Object appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Wrong Object has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Wrong Object and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Wrong Object with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Wrong Object.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have copied the last instructions section "(If you own the copyright to the material ...)" to Talk:The Wrong Object - I am afraid it has not been fully understood by you, Wrongobject. Hope this helps, BNutzer (talk) 23:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have sen an email to the permissions.en address folloing the instructions provided by Wikipedia as far as are concerned. As explained in the emal, the text comes from a source (http://www.wrongobject.com/homepage.php) which grants permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. user Talk:Wrongobject

Notability of Alex Maguire

A tag has been placed on Alex Maguire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have altered the entry to account for the importance of Maguire's work on the alternative jazz and progressive rock scene. Hope this meets your (legitimate) criteria for notability.User:Wrongobject

Notability of Serge Vandercam

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Serge Vandercam, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Serge Vandercam seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Serge Vandercam, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The late Serge vandercam is such a luminary of Belgian, and more broadly, European art, being one of the most famous representatives of the CoBrA movement - as attested ont he web and elsewhere - that it surprises me that I had to create a page several years after his death. His work is currently fetured alongside that of Alechinsky, Jorn et alii aspart of the CoBrA exhibition at the Musee des Beaux Arts in Brussels. Catalogues and monographs appear on a monbthly basis, etc. user:Wrongobject

AfD nomination of Alex Maguire

I have nominated Alex Maguire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Maguire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have altered the entry to account for the importance of Maguire's work on the alternative jazz and prgressive rock scene. Hope this meets your (legitimate) criteria for notability.User:Wrongobject

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Michel Delville

An article that you have been involved in editing, Michel Delville, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Delville. Thank you. CyberGhostface (talk) 02:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a reference for the claim that Michel's work was the topic of those radio shows? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delville is not only the founder of the band. With their bass player he is the only survivorof the original line-up and composes 95% of the original music of The Wrong Object (http://www.united-mutations.com/w/wrong_object.htm), with the exception of the albums featurng guests who contribute their own compositions (http://www.wrongobject.com/cds.php). The interviews (http://www.wrongobject.com/interviews.php) were given by him, not the band. User talk:Wrongobject

The Wrong Object and Michel Delville: Books LLC in references

I've removed two Books LLC references:

Musicien Belge: Adolphe Sax, Toots Thielemans, Ren Thomas, Renaud de Putter, Pierre-Yves Berhin, Michel Delville, Marc Moulin (Paris: Livres Groupe, 2010)
John Dankworth et al., eds. Belgian Progressive Rock Groups: Aksak Maboul, The Wrong Object, Dah, X-Legged Sally, Daau, Univers Zero (Memphis, Tennessee: LLC Books, 2010): http://www.amazon.com/Belgian-Progressive-Rock-Groups-Mindgames/dp/1156980925 and http://booksllc.net/?id=2569556

See: User:Fences and windows/Unreliable sources and Amazon.com controversies#Sale of Wikipedia.27s material as books. Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 06:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]