User talk:Playmobilonhishorse

VDM Publishing House

Nice work creating a decent stub. Do be careful with your use of sources - blogs and other self-published sources are not usually considered to be reliable sources of information for the purpose of a Wikipedia article. Try to replace them with sources with a reputation for fact checking. For informally keeping tabs on Alphascript Publishing's operations, there is a userspace essay, User:PrimeHunter/Alphascript Publishing sells free articles as expensive books, that you could contribute to. Fences&Windows 23:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Playmobilonhishorse. If you look at the revision history of VDM Publishing House and of the .png art file, you will notice that there have been some recent vandalisms of the page. I have fixed these, but (if you care about this page) I suggest you monitor it and watch for these. I don't know who is doing them, but it will be interesting to see if it keeps happening. — Lawrence King ^(talk) 00:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check User talk:Kasaalan/Publisher for the content I build about the case. Kasaalan (talk) 18:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fences the links Play added are perfectly WP:RS blogs and belong to academic circles. I proved the case in Talk:VDM Publishing House#RS academician blogs that are removed by false accusations and added some more links. Kasaalan (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

No, I hadn't been aware (as best I can recall). Tx for the head's up.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Note about Alphascript Publishing

Thank you for this piece of information. I was not aware of their books quality.--Remind me never (talk) 23:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alphascript Publishing

I was looking for further resources on Radio Ceylon and came across this book but I wasn't aware of the quality I shall withdraw it. Thank you. Colomboheat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colomboheat (talk • contribs) 10:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 20:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Anosmia - Medical Dictionary - Philip M. Parker - Icon Health Publications.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Anosmia - Medical Dictionary - Philip M. Parker - Icon Health Publications.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Web has a memory : Philip M. Parker (archived by WebCite from the original on 2010-09-08). Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch

Können Sie Deutsch sprechen?--94.182.102.115 (talk) 13:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ein bißchen. Warum diese Frage? Sind Sie Ferdolf (talk)^{Ferdowsi millenary celebration in Berlin (archived by WebCite from the original on 2010-11-29)}? MfG. Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das bin ich!--94.182.121.39 (talk) 09:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Books LLC reference

Good catch on that Playboy TV reference. Thanks for removing. --Scaleshombre (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marine Le Pen

As you indicate on my talk page and the article's talk page, I regularly contribute on the website Nations Presse Info where I post Marine Le Pen's press releases from the Front National's website. I do not earn any money to do such actions. About the article, I try to keep at best a Neutral Point Of View and relate facts with simple words. On February 2011, I read again the whole article and removed some promotional words like "constructive". Since I have nothing to hide, I voluntarily keep the same username on Nations Presse Info and here on wikipedia (cf my talk page). Jérôme MORENO HERRERO 15:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)-- User talk:Jeromemoreno[reply]

Hi

If you want to, please take a look on the AfD for 2011 failed Gothenburg terrorist attack.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about the VDM article user who got banned

I took a break from Wikipedia editing but one user gave me a badge for the article editing, so I checked the page, Another user [1] who got for using multiple accounts and disruptive behavior, just as I claim months before, yet threatened me to take administrative action claiming I act disruptive at [2]. Kasaalan (talk) 07:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Katia Tiutiunnik

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Katia Tiutiunnik. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.LivingMuse (talk) 02:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1-Read Wikipedia:Vandalism.

2-Please refrain from using the Katia Tiutiunnik page to promote a print on demand version of Tiutiunnik's thesis. Books published by Lambert Academic Publishing or other VDM Publishing imprints are not reliable sources. See: Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources.

Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 11:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a moment to read Katia Tiutiunnik. When you do you will see that Lambert is not even mentioned. Also, have a look at the list of references for the article. There are numerous, credible references from reliable sources. Please desist from vandalizing Katia Tiutiunnik LivingMuse (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Katia Tiutiunnik. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LivingMuse (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please take a moment to read Katia Tiutiunnik? If you do, you'll see that it does not even mention Lambert Academic Publishing (which you claim it's promoting) and is backed up by many more credible citations/references than numerous other Wiki pages. If Katia Tiutiunnik had the misfortune of having been duped into publishing with Lambert (like many good scholars have) that does not take away from all of her other wonderful accomplishments...Her page has been up for over 3 years and quite a few editors have contributed to it.LivingMuse (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VDM Verlag.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VDM Verlag.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books from Wiki

A new publisher seems to have appeared : Hephaestus books : http://www.lawrenceperson.com/?p=6829 - Drongou (talk) 21:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this informaton! Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 02:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WikiExperts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WikiExperts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiExperts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gamaliel (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Playmobilonhishorse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Book publishing companies of Mauritius

A tag has been placed on Category:Book publishing companies of Mauritius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

""Get Morebooks!"" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect "Get Morebooks!" and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#"Get Morebooks!" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]