User talk:WriterPankajRai

Hello, WriterPankajRai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira,

Thanks for letting me know about many things. I'm a contributor on Wikipedia, and I am creating pages for some popular topics that are not on Wikipedia, but they are popular and many independent sources have published about them.

Can you help me in figuring out a few things.

This one "Draft:JCBL Limited" Is one of the companies that I used to work in the past. The company wants its Wikipedia page to be created.

Being connected to the topic/company, still I have written content that is as per the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have written it in a neutral point of view, as you can see. Every hard statement in the article is backed by the reliable sources.

I am making these changes to the article as per your guidance:

Removing company's website links from the article.

2. Removing the statements that are not backed by any reliable source.

3. Going to make a disclaimer statement for the "Conflict of Interest".

Do let me know how can I make a disclaimer statement for the "Conflict of Interest". I would be glad if you help me.

And you can get this page reviewed by multiple contributors on Wikipedia and they will find that all sources are reliable and showcases the company as a valid and a popular entity that is working since last few decades in the country with many popular government and private projects. So there is no incorrect information in the article.

Please help me for further additions. I will make changes as per your policies. Do help me out, thanks! WriterPankajRai (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mobility Solutions (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mobility Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WriterPankajRai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, WriterPankajRai. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:JCBL Limited, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JCBL Limited

Can anyone tell me more about this company that is contributing towards major manufacturing projects in India? WriterPankajRai (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JCBL Limited (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

and please read WP:SOLUTIONS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JCBL Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mobility Solutions

Hello, WriterPankajRai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mobility Solutions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mobility Solutions

Hello, WriterPankajRai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mobility Solutions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 06:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mobility Solutions

Hello, WriterPankajRai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mobility Solutions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello WriterPankajRai. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WriterPankajRai. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WriterPankajRai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WriterPankajRai (talk) 09:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am not affiliated with this topic, and also I am not paid for anything. The whole thing is organic, and I am doing this just because I have to make contributions to the Wikipedia, and I want to add to my profile that I am a Wikipedia contributor. So that is why I am picking up topics that are popular, published, but not available on Wikipedia. This topic is one among these topics. In the new draft that I submitted, there is very minimal content as well as there is nothing promotional or advertorial. WriterPankajRai (talk) 09:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean, "add to your profile"? And there is much that is indeed promotional about the draft. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WriterPankajRai (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like I am a writer so I can add to my writer profile (outside wikipedia) and show my experience in contributing to wikipedia to the outer world. That was the only purpose. WriterPankajRai (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me know what is promotional, and I will remove that completely. It is not promotional rather the notable work done by the company. WriterPankajRai (talk) 10:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The word "solutions" is just marketing puffery(see WP:SOLUTIONS) and should be removed. The draft just tells of the existence of the company and its activities- this is promotional, you don't have to be soliciting or selling something. (promotion has a broader meaning on Wikipedia than is commonly understood) You should be summarizing independent reliable sources that give significant coverage to this company and show how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. "Significant coverage" goes beyond merely telling what the company does and goes into detail about what sources see as important/significant/influential about the company. Not every company merits an article, it depends on the sources. 331dot (talk) 10:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WriterPankajRai (talk) 11:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Solutions can be removed. Also, the sources given are reliable and independent sources. And the articles might only tell that what this company does, but the company has contributed towards government projects and is behind many notable projects such as making on-demand vehicles for celebrities like Salman Khan and Chief Ministers of India. This company was part of discussion when people searched about the company who made VIP buses for Akhilesh Yadav, Rahul Gandhi, etc. Do you think this company doesn't merits an article.

Let me do one thing, I am removing everything that explains about what the company does or did in the past, and add just information about the company.

Will it work? The minimal version? WriterPankajRai (talk) 11:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not enough to just give information about the company. This is not a mere database of things that exist. You must show that the company is a notable company as Wikipedia defines it(please click to read).

Notability is not inherited by association. The mere fact that this company has produced buses for notable people/politicians does not confer notability on the company. Microsoft does not merit an article because the US government or other governments or important people purchase its products, but because independent sources have extensively written about Microsoft and its influence in both business and society. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JCBL Limited (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JCBL Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WriterPankajRai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've previously made contributions to wikipedia, and corrected some facts also, by using this account I will be contributing to wikimedia by adding regional information and data. I have been a well reported writer and journalist, i have many regional things to contribute on wikipedia, please unblock my account. I am fully agreed to declined article submission by me. This was my first time I was writing a full article from scratch. I will study wikipedia policies more before going ahead with any future article submission WriterPankajRai (talk) 04:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.