User talk:Williamsyee

Williamsyee, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Williamsyee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
31	ADS (TV station) (talk)	Add sources
229	TV.com (talk)	Add sources
18	Jason Perlow (talk)	Add sources
178	ZDNet (talk)	Add sources
38	TEN (TV station) (talk)	Add sources
31	MySimon (talk)	Add sources
73	Violet Blue (talk)	Cleanup
1,156	IGN (talk)	Cleanup
42	CBS Home Entertainment (talk)	Cleanup
52	Ten Network Holdings (talk)	Expand
370	GameSpot (talk)	Expand
302	Major League Gaming (talk)	Expand
37	WFUT-DT (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
60	V-Rally 2 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
136	KYW-TV (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
72	All Media Network (talk)	Merge
128	Strafing (gaming) (talk)	Merge
57	RhythmOne (talk)	Merge
171	Kane & Lynch: Dead Men (talk)	Wikify
10	Amyre Makupson (talk)	Wikify
5	DirecTV blimp (talk)	Wikify
62	Amit Kumar filmography (talk)	Orphan
2	Auburn Hills Mobile Estates (talk)	Orphan
3	Balthasar Augustin Albrecht (talk)	Orphan
23	Brian Cooley (talk)	Stub
32	UrbanBaby (talk)	Stub
73	Smuggler's Run (talk)	Stub
5	Richard Beresford (talk)	Stub
30	TD Overdrive: The Brotherhood of Speed (talk)	Stub
16	Test Drive 4X4 (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Smartglasses

Hello Williamsyee, thank you for your efforts to improve this article. But please do not copypaste statements like "The World’s First Modular, Wearable Smart Screen That Works with Android or Win10 Host Devices" from external websites (see WP:COPYVIO), but phrase all edits in your own words. Aside from the copyvio concern, such content from company sites is too promotional and not suitable for Wikipedia anyway. All promotional claims need independent reliable 3rd-party sources. Hope this info is helpful, but please feel free to ask if you have further questions. GermanJoe (talk) 08:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GermanJoe, thank you for your advice. I will take note on my future edits. Williamsyee (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Draft:Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion. This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Williamsyee/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Williamsyee/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Williamsyee/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Williamsyee/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Williamsyee/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Williamsyee/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd, from its old location at User:Williamsyee/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Yu Baofa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Yu Baofa.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The article still needs more citations to independent sources, but the China Dailycoverage is of significant enough depth that I think I can let this out of the New Page Queue.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:15, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]