User talk:Wikiwizard57685
Welcome
[edit]
|
Ok thank you! Sorry I'll be rough around the edges in the beginning but I'm studying business and see a lot of "holes" in these pages that can use some editing and updating. I went to a Wiki meetup group in the city and was encouraged to participate in this project. I'm excited! Wikiwizard57685 (talk) 16:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)--Wikiwizard57685 (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- First, I hope you don't mind I moved your comment to where other people can see it, most wouldn't look for it in the welcome template. One of the nice things about Wikipedia is there is always the "undo" button. If only life had one... Anyway, do not worry about being "rough around the edges", we all start somewhere, and I'd say you're making a better start than I did! I agree, one of the fun things about Wikipedia is that it can never really be finished, there's always some way to improve it. Happy editing! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Excellent and thank you for the kind encouragement! Wikiwizard57685 (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikiwizard57685, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Wikiwizard57685! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Wikipedia is *not* Wiki!
[edit]Hi there! In one of your recently created articles I noticed that you said "My first attempt at adding key people from the VC and PE community to Wiki" in the edit summary. Please keep in mind that "wiki" is not a proper noun, and Wikipedia is the correct term (Imagine calling the Eiffel Tower 'Tower'. It is a tower, but not the tower). There are lots of wikis out there - Wikipedia is just one of thousands of other wikis! Calling Wikipedia "wiki" puts to shame all the other wikis in the universe. You can spread the world and tell your friends not to call Wikipedia "wiki". Thanks, and apologies for the ridiculous (but true) notice.
.png)
K6ka (talk | contribs) 15:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear K6ka,
Thank you for the note and I don't see that as ridiculous at all. I appreciate the candor and will note Wikipedia from now on. Wikiwizard57685 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Paul pignataro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
To whom it may concern. I may not be thinking about this the right way, but I'm trying to add people who have a following in the finance / investment banking world. Paul Pignataro along with the other authors I have added, and indicated by my edits to Aswath Damodoran's page are well known throughout college campuses at business schools and investment firms as their methods for analysis have helped define and/or redefine such analyses. Is you proposal of removal simply because I have not elaborated properly? Thanks!
Nomination of Paul pignataro for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul pignataro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul pignataro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 18:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear JMHamo. I'm not sure I understand this message. Is there anything I should do at this point? Otherwise I'm going to keep on editing other topics.
Speedy deletion nomination of Jeffrey hooke
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jeffrey hooke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Darkesthoursoflife († • ©) 19:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mahendra Ramsinghani
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mahendra Ramsinghani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Darkesthoursoflife († • ©) 19:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)