User talk:Wikilover3509

This is Wikilover3509's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Wikilover3509, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wikilover3509/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikilover3509! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Timtrent were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikilover3509/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wikilover3509/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikilover3509 -- I've declined this deletion request because I think it's possible that the subject is notable. What you need to do is rewrite the draft based wholly on what reliable sources write about the subject, such as (nonpaid) obituaries in newspapers/magazines and book coverage, rather than any personal knowledge. There's lots of good sources on the open web, eg [1] and you might be able to access more via the WP:Resource Request service. Good luck! Regards, Espresso Addict (talk)

Absolutely concur. I might try writing one myself, in fact. DS (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DragonflySixtyseven thanks. I found an obituary https://www.newspapers.com/article/intelligencer-journal-corbet-j-barry-obi/133006884/ which is one more independent source Wikilover3509 (talk) 03:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Wikilover3509/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Wikilover3509/sandbox. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Corbet's spinal injury and his reinvention post that has been documented in a movie called Full Circle which has just been released.https://deadline.com/2023/08/full-circle-documentary-release-date-abramorama-1235529579/ Wikilover3509 (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barry Corbet has been accepted

Barry Corbet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, feels wonderful to be a part of this awesome community of people who are helping people get access to curated and researched information. Look forward to publishing more articles Wikilover3509 (talk) 01:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Species and recognized places (when WP:V is met) are generally never deleted. You didn't provide policy-based reasons for deletion either. Please make sure to quote at least one policy when starting AFDs: "This subject fails the [X or Y] policy". Maybe you want to clear out some pages from Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability? Geschichte (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your inputs - really appreciate it. Wikilover3509 (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfD creation

If an AfD already exists and has been closed, please do not edit that AfD. The correct way to start a 2nd nomination is outlined at WP:AFDHOWTO so please follow that. Whilst not compulsory, I would recommend the WP:TWINKLE method outlined on the right hand side of that page. The Twinkle app is much quicker and guarantees that there are no errors. It does a search for previous AfDs and will automatically create the 2nd nomination separate discussion for you, ensuring no errors. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am learning something new everyday. Thanks for helping me do the 2nd nomination the right way - really appreciate it Wikilover3509 (talk) 05:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]